1. "Bullets, bombs, jails and spies"
2. "More money channelled to wealthy" says
CLC
3. Budget may spark Aboriginal barricades
4. Looking at Quebec election - Editorial
5. No war against Iran - Editorial
6. The dilemma of CN workers
7. Farm workers tragedy hints at the real problem
8. Stop stalling on minimum wage
9. Advocates demand higher Alberta minimum wage
10. Canadians rally against Iraq and
Afghanistan wars
11. CUPW activist: "Remove Canadian troops"
12. Afghans turning against Canadian troops
13. Listen, Yankee - The message that was
ignored
12. Anti-War Calendar
13. Failing marks on environment, social issues
14. ASEAN and ILO to address labour issues
15. CAFTA fails to protect workers
16. Haiti to receive doctors and development
funds from Cuba and Venezuela
17. What's Left
18. Introducing Marxism: A Communist Party Study
Course
19. PV Crossword
20. May Day 2007 Greeting Ads
Podcast of People's Voice
Articles
Clarté (en
français)
21. Our 2007 Fund Appeal for $50,000
(Printable
form)
People’s Voice
SHOPPING BAG
BOOK
Not One More Death, essays condemning the US war against Iraq, by John le Carré, Richard Dawkins,
Brian Eno, Michel Faber,
Harold Pinter, and Haifa
Zangana
CALENDAR
People’s
Voice 2007 antiwar calendar
SUBSCRIPTION
a
12 month complimentary subscription
to People’s Voice (keep it or
give it to a friend)
Che T-Shirt
Surprise Music CD
Send
your phone number with your donation,
and we will contact you about your
choice of music CD, or your T-shirt
size before shipping
Here’s
How It Works:
For
a $100 Donation ... One item of your choice
$200 Donation ............
Choose two items
$300 Donation ............
Choose three items
$400 Donation ............
Choose four items
$500 Donation ............
Choose five items
For
a donation of $1000 or more, take the whole bag and we will provide a lifetime subscription for you or
a friend of your choice.
All
subs renewed in the first four months of 2007 will be credited for 13 months at the price of 12 months ($25).
Offer expires April 30.
Send all requests and donations to PV
Business Office: 173 West Ave
North, Hamilton, ON, L8L 5C7.
|
People's Voice deadlines:
APRIL 16-30 issue: Thursday, April 5
MAY 1-15 issue: Thursday, April 19
Send submissions to PV Editorial
Office, 706 Clark Drive, Vancouver,
V5L 3J1, pvoice@telus.net
|
People's
Voice finds many "Global Class Struggle" reports at the "Labour Start"
website, http://www.labourstart.org. We urge our readers to
check it out!
|
*
* * * *
People's Voice
Canadian
Publications Mail Sales Product Agreement #205214
ISSN number 1198-8657
People's Voice is published by:
New Labour Press Ltd:
706 Clark Drive,
VANCOUVER, B.C. V5L 3J1
Phone:604-255-2041
Fax:604-254-9803
email: pvoice@telus.net
Editor:
Kimball Cariou
Editorial Board: Kimball
Cariou, MiguelFigueroa,
Doug Meggison, Naomi Rankin, Liz Rowley, Jim Sacouman
* * * * * *
Letters
People's Voice welcomes your letters
on any subject covered in our pages.
We reserve the right to edit for length and clarity,
and to refuse to print letters which may be libellous
or which contain unnecessary personal attacks.
Send your views to:
"Letters to the Editor",
796 Clark Dr., Vancouver, BC V5L 3J1,
or pvoice@telus.net
People's Voice articles may be reprinted without permission,
provided the source is
credited.
* * * * * *
Send me
information on the Communist Party of Canada.
The Communist Party of
Canada, formed in 1921,
has a proud history of fighting for jobs, equality, peace,
Canadian independence, and socialism.
The CPC does much more than run candidates in elections.
We think the fight against big business and its parties
is a year-round job,
so our members are active across the country,
to build our party and to help strengthen people's movements
on a wide range of issues.
All our policies and
leadership
are set democratically by our members.
To find out more about Canada's party of Socialism,
give us a call at the nearest CPC office.
* * * * * *
Central Committee CPC
290A Danforth Ave Toronto, Ont. M4K 1N6
Ph: (416) 469-2446
fax: (416) 469-4063 E-mail
info@cpc-pcc.ca
Parti Communiste du
Québec
3961 Av. Barclay, App. 4
Montréal, H3S 1K9
E-mail: pueblo@sympatico.ca
B.C.Committee CPC
706 Clark Drive, Vancouver, V5L 3J1
Tel: (604) 254-9836
Fax: (604) 254-9803
Edmonton CPC
Box 68112, 70 Bonnie Doon P.O.
Edmonton, AB, T6C 4N6
Tel: (780) 465-7893
Fax: (780)463-0209
Calgary CPC
Unit #1 - 19 Radcliffe Close SE
Calgary AB, T2A 6B2
Tel: (403) 248-6489
Regina CPC
P.O. Box 482, Regina, SK S4P 2Z6
Ottawa CPC
Tel: (613) 232-7108
Manitoba Committee
387 Selkirk Ave., Winnipeg, R2W 2M3
Tel/fax: (204) 586-7824
Ontario Ctee. CPC
290A Danforth Ave., Toronto, M4K 1N6
Tel: (416) 469-2446
Hamilton Ctee. CPC
265 Melvin Ave., Apt. 815
Hamilton, ON.
Tel: (905) 548-9586
Atlantic Region CPC
Box 70 Grand Pré, NS, B0P 1M0
Tel/fax: (902) 542-7981
http://www.communist-party.ca/
* * * * * *
News for People, Not for Profits!
Every issue of People's Voice
gives you the latest
on the fightback from coast to coast.
Whether it's the struggle for jobs or peace, resistance to social
cuts,
solidarity with Cuba, or workers' struggles around the world,
we've got the news the corporate media won't print.
And we do more than that
- we report and analyze events
from a revolutionary perspective,
helping to build the movements for justice and equality,
and eventually for a socialist Canada.
Read the paper that fights
for working people
- on every page, in every issue!
People's
Voice
$25 for 1 year
$45 for 2 years
Low-income special rate: $12 for 1-year
Outside Canada $25 US or $35 Cdn for 1 year
Send to: People's Voice, 173 West Ave. North,
Hamilton, ON, L8L 5C7
REDS
ON THE WEB
http://www.communist-party.ca
http://www.solidnet.org
(Home)
"Bullets, bombs, jails and spies"
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
By People's Voice
Editor Kimball Cariou
The March
2007 federal budget
presented by Conservative Finance Minister Flaherty has been widely
analysed and dissected, but few observers have expressed its full
significance.
On the right
and in the
mainstream corporate media, the pundits have focussed on Harper's
attempt to win support in Quebec, or on so-called "big spending
increases." But these approaches miss the forest for the trees, perhaps
deliberately so.
Among the
labour and progressive
movements, most observers have been closer to the mark, criticising
Flaherty's budget for a long list of reactionary measures. The Tories
have been roasted for their strategy of appearing to act on crucial
issues such as the environment, while doing virtually nothing of
importance.
The Canadian
Labour Congress, for
example, correctly notes that the budget "unfairly channels more money
to wealthy individuals and profitable corporations.... (and) greatly
erodes the federal government's capacity to improve the quality of life
of working people...." The CLC laments that corporate tax cuts
implemented since 2000 now cost $10 billion per year, funds that could
finance Canada-wide childcare and pharmacare programs.
Condemnation
of the Harper
government's backtracking on a genuine childcare program has been the
focus of criticism from many other groups, such as Code Blue.
Similarly, the shocking omission of any funding to expand low-income
housing has been attacked by virtually every organization and movement
dealing with the exploding crisis of homelessness across Canada.
But these are
not just the
shortcomings of a right-wing government. These are far-reaching and
deliberate policy decisions which illustrate the true nature of
Harper's agenda. The Tories are determined to reverse the historic
struggle to compel the capitalist state to bear some responsibility for
the well-being of Canadians. If Harper's gang have their way, the role
of the state (although not its fundamental nature) will be drastically
altered.
By using tax
breaks as virtually
the only tool to shape social policy, for example, the Conservatives
are attempting to appeal to working people who face declining real
incomes. But the reality is that these changes transfer a larger share
of the economic pie baked by working people to the wealthy and the
corporations. Any benefits to low and middle-income earners are small
and likely transitory, especially if the Tories win a majority in
Parliament.
Even more
fundamentally, this
policy shift is intended, not just to restrain public social programs,
but to tear the social safety net to shreds. Families will increasingly
be forced to rely on their own dwindling resources and on "charity" to
care for young children and elderly parents, and for all family members
with health problems. Women in particular face the prospect of even
stronger pressures to retreat from the public sphere of employment,
back into the home. If this recalls the fascist slogan of "kinder,
kirke, kuche" (children, church, home), it is not coincidental. These
values are is widely shared by the U.S. ultra-right, which has close
ties with the Harper Conservatives.
The other
side of this policy
shift is an increasing emphasis on the authoritarian side of the
capitalist state - the military, prisons and police. This is the
so-called "crime and terror" agenda, an attempt to win votes by fanning
the fears of ordinary Canadians.
As a few
groups have pointed out,
one of the most significant spending increases by the Tories is another
huge boost in military spending, which is on the way to the $20
billion-plus range within a few years. An extra $200 million is
earmarked for Canada's part in the NATO military occupation in
Afghanistan. Another $106 million is to be spent on federal jails, and
the Canadian Security Intelligence Service budget will be topped up by
a further $80 million.
No, this is
not just another
budget aimed at winning an election, although the Tories are clearly
pleased that the corporate media has put this spin on their efforts.
This is a budget to speed up the dismantling of any progressive
features of the Canadian state, and to pour taxpayers' dollars into
bullets, bombs, jails and spies.
"More
money channelled to wealthy" says CLC
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
PV Vancouver
Bureau
While the
pages of Canada's daily
papers have been filled with positive responses to the March 19 Tory
budget issued by big business, the trade union movement took a
decidedly negative perspective.
Speaking for
the 3.2
million-member Canadian Labour Congress, President Ken Georgetti
pointed out that Jim Flaherty's second budget "unfairly channels more
money to wealthy individuals and profitable corporations... (and)
greatly erodes the federal government's capacity to improve the quality
of life of working people, families and communities."
"The real
giveaways are for
people with lots of money and they will get them immediately," said
Georgetti. "The rest of us will have to wait next year to get a few
hundred dollars."
The CLC noted
that the budget
increases the lifetime capital gains exemption for business owners by
$250,000 immediately and maintains the tax cuts previously scheduled
for corporations. Most of the measures to help students, workers, and
families will take effect next year.
The CLC
called the new capital
cost allowance write-off for manufacturing investments "a good first
step to address the crisis in the goods producing sectors," and
supported the announcement of $500 million for labour market training,
which would take effect next year, while saying that "more needs to be
done urgently."
"What is in
this budget for
workers who recently lost their jobs in the manufacturing sector? Or
fear that their job is at risk?" asked Georgetti. "What is in this
budget for newcomers in Alberta looking for affordable housing? What is
in this budget for young families who cannot find decent reliable and
affordable child care? In all three cases, the answer is nothing."
He went on to
say that the budget
measures "coming on top of the previously-scheduled corporate tax cuts
implemented since 2000, now costing $10 billion per year, will make it
harder to finance a national pharmacare program, sectoral development,
child care and early learning and other critical priorities."
Calling it "a
budget structured
to avoid an election," Canadian Auto Workers president Buzz Hargrove
said the budget "recognizes problems but fails to address them. There
is a nod here and a wink there, but no real solutions."
Hargrove
called the tax supports
for manufacturing investment "a bandaid to the hemorrhaging
manufacturing sector" which will only last 18 months. "It does nothing
to stem the loss of manufacturing jobs - some 200,000 manufacturing
jobs have disappeared in Canada over the last two years. It does
nothing to address our growing trade deficit in manufactured goods."
He slammed
the budget for doing
little to help Canadians escape the poverty trap, for example by
providing a few hundred dollars in tax credits but not introducing a
$10 minimum wage and a national child care program.
The budget's
environmental
proposals are "inadequate or wrongheaded," said Hargrove. He pointed
out that with just $30 million over two years, the program to get older
vehicles off the road "won't retire many vehicles."
"Instead of
providing an
incentive to made-in-Canada green automotive products that would
strengthen our most important industry," said Hargrove, "the Vehicle
Efficiency Incentives will instead open the door even wider to imports
from countries which limit access to their markets."
The budget
contained lots of talk
but little action for working people, said B.C. Federation of Labour
Secretary-Treasurer, Angela Schira.
"Childcare
tax breaks for
corporations should have been invested in building real spaces," Schira
said. "Corporations don't have a great track record when it comes to
childcare." She added that the $250 million in childcare funding
announced last year only works out to $33 million for BC. Before the
Conservatives axed the childcare plan, BC was set to receive over $150
million this year. "Those dollars should have been provided to
licensed, mostly non-profit, providers to increase spaces now."
The "working
income tax benefit"
of $500 for individuals and $1,000 for low-income families does little
for families struggling to find affordable housing, Schira stated,
calling for a $10 federal minimum wage.
"The new
packaging of the
Conservatives should not fool Canadians," said Paul Moist, president of
the Canadian Union of Public Employees. "Underneath these new promises
is their true agenda: to weaken national social programs and diminish
the role of public services in Canada. The government is abandoning its
leadership role by having no conditions or federal accountability
requirements linked to the additional transfers. This budget takes it
one step further and encourages greater privatization of public
services."
Moist warned
that cash-starved
municipalities will get no relief unless they agree to public-private
partnership (P3) schemes: "The federal government is attempting to
bribe provincial and municipal governments with a promise to top up
infrastructure funding costs by 25 per cent - if the municipality or
province ties the project to a P3. Essentially we are talking about
public financing of private profit."
Budget may spark Aboriginal barricades
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
PV Vancouver
Bureau
The March 19
Tory budget has stirred up a storm of protest among Aboriginal peoples
across Canada.
"Today's
budget was supposed to
contain something for all Canadians, but today, First Nations are
beyond disappointment," said Phil Fontaine, National Chief of the
Assembly of First Nations. "We don't see any reason to believe that the
government cares about the shameful conditions of First Nations."
Fontaine
called it "encouraging"
that the government has renewed programs such as the Aboriginal Justice
Strategy and the Aboriginal Skills and Employment Partnership
initiative. However, he said, "the investments in Budget 2007 fall far
short of a comprehensive plan" especially to solve the pressing need
for social housing.
"Nowhere is
the fiscal imbalance
more apparent than in the critical under-funding of First Nations
health, child welfare, education, housing and infrastructure," said
Fontaine. "No other Canadian citizen has had to endure a two-percent
cap on funding that has now lasted for over a decade. Our population
continues to grow and the poverty gap continues to widen. Today's
budget only contributes to the imbalance by providing $39 billion over
seven years to the provinces, without any comparable attention to First
Nations.
Referring to
title of the recent Senate Report on specific claims, Negotiation or Confrontation: It's
Canada's Choice,
Fontaine warned of the consequences of failing to deal with "the huge
debt to First Nations in the form of outstanding land
claims."
Other Aboriginal leaders were even more direct. The Assembly of
Manitoba Chiefs is threatening not to co-operate on new hydro dams or
forestry projects. AMC Grand Chief Ron Evans said he was "reeling" from
the budget, which included only about $70 million in new spending for
Aboriginals out of total new spending of $10 billion.
"This budget
only allows for enough money to continue the management of our own
misery," Evans said.
Evans, who
was a Liberal
candidate in Churchill in the 2004 federal election, is also upset with
Manitoba NDP premier Gary Doer, and is preparing to block provincial as
well as national projects.
"What
surprises me is the premier
was very happy with the budget and yet he was one of the champions of
Kelowna," said Evans, pointing to the now-defunct, $5.1-billion
Aboriginal accord reached in 2005 to increase funding for housing,
education, health care and economic opportunities.
He said that
if governments
ignore First Nations issues, the response may include blocking
construction of new hydro lines or dams, or preventing the exploitation
of valuable northern forests and minerals.
"As sure as
spring follows
winter, Stephen Harper's Budget 2007 shall trigger a summer of
Aboriginal protests from one end of this country to the other,"
predicted Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, President of the Union of BC
Indian Chiefs.
"In our view,
this latest
deliberate attack against Aboriginal people represents `strike three'
for the Harper government. First it was the complete rejection of the
Kelowna Accord, second it was Canada's refusal to support the United
Nations' Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous People and now we have
the announcement of $21 million in new spending for Aboriginals in the
face of a $9 billion dollar surplus," added Grand Chief Phillip.
"Enough is enough. Our communities have long since reached their
breaking point."
"Let's be
clear," he said. "We do
not need more Federal government welfare payments. What we do need is
for the Government of Canada to fully meet its Constitutional and
lawful obligations in the area of outstanding land rights issues... We
need the Government of Canada to recognize and accommodate our
Aboriginal and Treaty entitlements to the lands and resources within
our respective territories. Further, economic development needs to
become a major priority within Federal Government spending."
"Obviously
the Government of
Canada is not listening," he concluded. "Perhaps a summer of
barricades, balaclavas and burning tires will serve to draw attention
to the urgency of the desperate situation of the Aboriginal people of
Canada."
David
Chartrand, President of the
Manitoba Métis Federation and Minister of Finance for the
Métis
National Council (MNC), expressed disappointment that less than one
percent of federal spending on Aboriginal peoples is directed to the
350,000 Métis who live in Canada.
"The gap
continues to widen
between the expectations of Canadians and the realities of the
struggling Métis," said Chartrand. "Over time this exclusion
will
inevitably result in a much wider gap with rising costs to be borne by
future Canadians in future budgets. This is not just a Métis
issue - it
is a Canadian issue. We will all pay for this budget's missed
opportunity."
Looking at Quebec election - Editorial
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
People's
Voice Editorial, April 1-15, 2007
A preliminary look at the March 26
election in Québec shows lots of bad news, but also some good.
The overall
results are
disastrous for working people. The bitterly anti-labour Jean Charest,
remains in office, and the official opposition is now Mario Dumont's
reactionary ADQ. The Parti Québecois under André
Boisclair suffered
heavy losses, finishing third. Already the corporate media has
proclaimed that voters supported more social cuts and privatization
(and that Québec sovereignty was defeated - a line we've heard
many
times before).
But there are
other ways to read
the results. The Charest Liberals were hurt by powerful public
opposition to their right-wing policies. However, the PQ refused to
pledge to repeal the Liberal changes to the labour code or to
renegotiate contracts imposed on public sector workers. The PQ was
endorsed by the Québec Federation of Labour, and the CSN urged
its
members to defeat the Liberals, but there was little real working class
enthusiasm for the PQ campaign.
Faced with
this wretched choice,
145,051 voters (3.65%) turned to Québec Solidaire, which
campaigned for
a left alternative program. QS won nine percent of the vote in central
and east Montreal ridings, emerging as a major force. Congratulations
to QS candidates Amir Khadir, who took 8303 votes (29.4%) to finish a
strong second in Mercier riding, and Francoise David, who placed second
in Gouin riding with 7913 votes (26%).
The Green
Party also won 154,367
votes, meaning that 300,000 voters - one in thirteen - lack any voice
in the National Assembly. Proportional representation would have
elected four or five candidates from the QS and the Greens. In the
meantime, the battle for progressive policies in Québec will
continue
in the workplaces, campuses and communities.
No war against Iran - Editorial
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
People's Voice
Editorial, April 1-15, 2007
The danger of war against Iran is once
again rising, with the potential for catastrophic consequences going
far beyond the horrors of the Iraq war.
The full
truth of Iran's seizure
of British sailors will no doubt emerge soon. Even now, we must ask:
why should Britain, the major accomplice of the U.S. in the illegal war
of aggression in Iraq, have any right to board and search Iranian
merchant vessels? This incident follows on the heels of provocative
claims that Iran is directly involved in arming insurgent forces which
are fighting the occupation troops in Iraq, and that Iran is supposedly
"on the verge" of building nuclear weapons.
A familiar
pattern is emerging.
Desperate to justify the imperialist campaign to control Mideast energy
supplies, Washington and London are hurling a barrage of accusations at
Iran. Now, the lives of brave U.S. and British soldiers are threatened,
requiring swift and decisive action - and please don't ask why those
troops are in the region in the first place.
There is no
doubt that the
Iranian government is a reactionary, fundamentalist regime, controlled
by leaders who are willing to gamble the lives of the people to stay in
power. Much the same can be said about the Bush regime itself. We are
confident that the people of Iran, given time and genuine international
solidarity, will restore their country to the path democracy and
freedom. Attempts to "create a crisis" and set the stage for military
aggression can only set back this process.
The current
dangerous situation
calls for coordinated, responsible and united action of all peace
supporters. We urge all peace forces in Canada to demand negotiations,
not confrontation, and to support respect for international law and the
sovereignty and independence of nations.
The dilemma of CN workers
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
By Sam Hammond
In a previous issue of People's Voice,
we commented on the CN Rail strike by Canadian members of the United
Transit Union, and the explosive situation developing between the four
Canadian Chairs (comprising the negotiating committee) and the
International Office in Cleveland (UTU president Paul Thompson). Since
the CN Rail workers went on strike Feb. 9, there have been weird and
not so wonderful developments.
Rex Beatty,
the main spokesperson
of the negotiating committee, and the three other regional
chairpersons, were all arbitrarily removed from office by Thompson.
Negotiations were handed over to Canadian Vice-Presidents John
Armstrong and Bob Sharpe. This was only part of a tightly bundled
series of events happening almost concurrently. The militant strikers
(97% strike vote) were pulled to and fro while they tried to maintain a
united face to CN Rail and figure out just what the hell was happening
to their union. The Canadian Industrial Relations Board was in session
dealing with a contention by CN Rail that the strike was not sanctioned
by the international union, which took the identical position that the
strike is not sanctioned and therefore illegal. Stick-handling through
the process of compliance with Canadian labour law, the CIRB has no
choice but to declare that since the negotiators had complied with the
law, from their point of view the strike was legal. In the background,
the Harper cabinet prepared back-to-work legislation. Minister of
Labour Jean-Pierre Blackburn told the media that the legislation was
hours away, and the NDP declared openly in the House that they would
not support a back-to-work law.
The
negotiating committee won at
the CIRB, but lost when the international President removed them from
office. The two Canadian Vice Presidents negotiated a tentative
agreement spanning one year with a signing bonus of $1000 and a 3% pay
increase. A back to work protocol allowed for a ratification vote to be
counted by March 26, resulting in either acceptance or a return to
negotiations and possible strike. Because so many members did not
receive their memorandum of agreement and their ballots, the vote count
was delayed to April 9.
Rex Beatty,
who looked like a
beleaguered Canadian thwarted by the International, (indeed this writer
leaned strongly in that direction), emerged as something less than
saintly by openly becoming the lynchpin of a raid on the UTU's Canadian
membership by the Teamsters Union. Deposed but by no means departed.
One of the
International's
strongest contentions against Beatty was that he had a hidden agenda
and was manipulating towards a raid on behalf of the Teamsters. He
vehemently denied this right up to the minute he made the charges valid
by doing exactly what he was accused of. The much maligned Paul
Thompson, although unwise and clumsy in his handling of all this,
emerged as not so evil as previously seen.
So where the
hell are we now?
Most importantly where are the Canadian CN workers who belong to UTU?
This is much more deadly then a child trying to figure out a divorce,
with Mom or Dad's suitor lurking in the background. This is business
trade unionism with its corporate mentality - fighting over possession
of workers, fighting over a dues base. Any morality here is very hard
to find.
Only a year
or so ago, the
Teamsters pulled off a raid against UTU Canadian members employed by CP
Rail, managing to capture about three thousand of them. This opened a
financial wound in the International, who already were spending more in
Canada than they were collecting. Not unusual, and not decisive, but
definitely a rub. CN Rail, for their part, pushed the envelope by
settling with the CAW but leaving virtually everything on the table
with the UTU, almost guaranteeing a strike. The International seemed to
fall into the trap and allowed Rex Beatty to manipulate in the 11th
hour instead of inserting the Canadian Vice presidents into the melee
earlier. Perhaps they couldn't help it.
Meanwhile the
International
Brotherhood of Teamsters, fresh from the capture at CP Rail, apparently
were steering Rex Beatty all the time. The only other conclusion that
can be drawn is that Brother Beatty was so impressed with the
International's accusations that he adopted them as a personal
operating agenda. At this time Brother Beatty is asking UTU members to
reject the tentative agreement and sign cards with the Teamsters.
The members
have some very hard
decisions to make. If they accept the tentative agreement, will that be
measured as vindication of the International and satisfaction with the
agreement? Many will accept the agreement to buy another year in which
to straighten out their union and also to keep them out of the clutches
of "Final Offer Settlement Arbitration."
If many
members reject the
tentative offer, will it be construed as an invitation to the
Teamsters? You don't have to be a rocket scientist to see the dilemma
faced by the rank and file. In fact, neither vote has a universal
meaning of compliance or rejection of the UTU or the Teamsters. The
danger is that the Teamsters will read it the way they want to justify
an acceleration of the raid. They have fired the first shots, and an
offensive is imminent.
Shame, shame,
shame. Shame on the
business model of trade unionism that makes workers into chattels to be
used, traded or captured. Shame on the business model of trade unionism
that feeds on what's left of a workers life after the capitalists have
taken their generous share. Shame on the Canadian Labour Congress,
which oversees this internecine warfare and does not fight for policies
that would prevent it. Shame on the professional trade unionists who go
to CLC Conventions and interrupt their raiding for a few days to sing
Solidarity Forever as a theatrical display for the rank and file, and
then resume their activities on the following Monday morning.
The only
bright part of this
whole fiasco is the militancy of the CN workers, who almost unanimously
chose to fight rather than fold. Theirs is the unenviable task of
voting on an agreement that is fraught with danger either way. Their
only hope is the unity and militancy that brought them into this
struggle. Only this can bring them through. Good luck to you, brothers
and sisters.
The militancy
of Canadian workers
must somehow find expression in a housecleaning that will restore some
of the fundamentals of our labour history and put control back into
their hands, no matter what union they choose. Workers need to
reorganize Canadian Labour so that it can unite instead of raid, unify
around the needs of all Canadian people, and unite with the social
justice movement - a Canadian Labour movement to be proud of and
without an international border running through it.
Farm workers tragedy hints at the real problem
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
Commentary by the
Lower Fraser Club, Communist Party of Canada
Three farm workers were killed and
fourteen others injured in a traffic accident in B.C. on March 7. These
contract labourers were being driven to work in a van that had been
illegally modified to accommodate more passengers than it was licensed
for and was further overloaded.
Unfortunately
this is an old and
familiar story in the Fraser Valley, where contract labourers are
subjected to the worst working conditions with very little
consideration for health and safety. In spite of the current
circumstances no charges have yet been laid.
There is the
usual political
back-pedaling with both parties in the Legislature pointing fingers at
each other. WorkSafeBC (the former Workers' Compensation Board) and
Insurance Corporation of BC (ICBC) are busy washing their hands of any
responsibility. Some say the responsibility lies with the farm labour
contractor who owns the unsafe vehicle, or even with the workers who
"willingly" entered the van, even though this was their only way to
make it to work. Since the workers as well as the contractor are of the
Indo-Canadian community, racist undertones have made their way into the
debate.
What nobody
has said so far is
that under capitalism this is business as usual. The history of
capitalism since the earliest days of the Industrial Revolution has
demonstrated over and over again that the health and safety of the
workers will always rank far below the pursuit of profit. Workers have
had to struggle all throughout history to win concessions from the
bosses for safe work places, healthy work environments, humane
treatment and fair compensation for their labour. Communists have
historically supported and helped win those struggles.
Today many
jobs are safer because
of these labour struggles, but the workplace is still a dangerous
place, especially if you are young, inexperienced or have no protection
through a union agreement or minimal government regulations. Workers
are still hurt, maimed, killed and suffer industrial diseases because
of unsafe conditions, poor training and poor enforcement of existing
regulations. Fines and other penalties are considered a "cost of
business" by profit-hungry employers.
Farm workers
have even less
protection under existing labour legislation than other workers. Year
after year we witness these workers becoming ill because of pesticides
and poor living conditions, and being at risk because of dangerous
transportation practices. This is in addition to the many exploitative
practices such as being paid less than minimum wage, getting paid late
or not at all, not getting paid for overtime, and so on.
Because many
of these workers are
immigrants or migrants, they are very vulnerable to the actions of
unscrupulous businessmen. In 1970 Employment Standards were amended to
include these workers, but the Campbell Liberal government removed many
of those provisions when they stripped the Employment Standards Act in
2003. This was undoubtedly meant to facilitate the workers exploitation
by the private sector.
Guaranteed
workers rights must be
the responsibility of the state, and it is clearly the bailiwick of the
Ministry of Labour to ensure that all existing regulations are being
enforced. It is further clear that it is necessary to include farm
workers in all existing labour legislation, and to improve this
legislation.
The BC
Federation of Labour has
been issuing a number of recommendations following this latest tragedy
but it is still too reactive, rather than putting these issues on top
of its agenda at all times. What is needed is concrete political action
by the trade union movement aimed at bettering the lot of farm labour.
Putting the
pursuit of profit
ahead of the health and safety of workers lies at the core of the
problem. We can struggle and win reforms to labour laws and health and
safety regulations, but in the final analysis these rights can never be
guaranteed under the capitalist system, for which profit is its raison
d'etre.
Only a system
that puts workers'
needs ahead of private greed can provide the conditions to ensure that
workers will not be killed, maimed or struck ill because of unsafe or
unhealthy work. This system is socialism, and the working class in this
country needs to understand the absolute necessity of changing the
economic system we live in.
Stop stalling on minimum wage
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
ACORN (the
Association of
Community Groups for Reform Now) is criticizing the Ontario government
for "monumental stalling" on raising the minimum wage.
"The Ontario
government seems to
have had no problem with raising their own salaries over the Christmas
holidays," says ACORN member Imran Butt. "But when it comes to the low
and moderate income families who need a raise most, Premier McGuinty
would rather wait through another two elections before raising the
minimum wage in 2010."
While it only
took the government
just eight days to give themselves a 25% raise, says Butt, they expect
Ontario's most impoverished to wait three years for 20%.
Finance
Minister Sorbara has
released a study which warns of widespread job loss if the minimum wage
is raised immediately. But ACORN notes that his government paid an
economist for the answer they wanted to hear: that raising the minimum
wage is scary.
In contrast,
dozens more
economists disagree with this view. In a statement signed by 86 Ontario
economists on raising the minimum wage, the point was made that "There
is a common, but incorrect, assumption that higher minimum wages
destroy low-wage jobs and increase unemployment among those they are
most intended to help. Modern economic research has indicated, however,
that the negative employment effects of minimum wages are negligible
and can be overwhelmed by the positive impacts of minimum wages on
labour force participation and consumer spending. In other words, it is
more likely that higher minimum wages are associated with enhanced
employment and income opportunities for low-wage workers."
In the US,
over 650 economists
(including 5 Nobel Laureates) supported raising the minimum wage there
from $5.15 to $7.25 in 2005. At current exchange rates that would be an
increase of nearly $2.50 CDN, comparable to raising the minimum wage in
Ontario to $10.50. The US economists called raising the minimum wage
"an important tool in fighting poverty" and said that "a modest
increase in the minimum wage would improve the well-being of low-wage
workers and would not have the adverse effects that critics have
claimed."
The US
economists pointed to
research which shows that "most of the beneficiaries are adults, most
are female, and the vast majority are members of low-income working
families." They supported wage indexing to protect against inflation.
Advocates demand higher Alberta minimum wage
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
In the days leading up to the annual
salary increase for provincial MLAs, advocates are calling for the
province to increase Alberta's minimum wage to $10 per hour and to
index it to inflation.
"Why should
low-income people
have to wait years for increases to their wages when politicians
automatically get their raise every April 1st based on the average
weekly earnings index," asked Bill Moore-Kilgannon, Executive Director
of Public Interest Alberta. "Our provincial Living Wage consultation
and research shows that with the skyrocketing increases in rents and
other costs of living, people are not able to earn a basic living at
less than $10 per hour, even if they are able to work a full 40 hours
per week."
A new study
by Stuart Murray and Hugh Mackenzie of the Canadian Centre for Policy
Alternatives, Bring Minimum Wages
above the Poverty Line,
shows that Alberta's seven dollar minimum wage is significantly below
the Statistics Canada Low Income Cut Off (LICO) and loses value each
year. Alberta's minimum wage reached its peak in 1977 when its value in
2005 dollars was $9.31 per hour.
"This study
clearly demonstrates
that the one in five workers who earn less than $10 per hour have not
been benefiting from Alberta's economic boom," said Caron Lawson,
Chairperson of Public Interest Alberta's Living Wage Task Force and a
social worker at a hospital in Calgary. "You see the impact on people
and their families who work long hours to make ends meet. It is hard to
see so many families who do not have the means to provide the basics,
let alone cover unexpected health expenses or save for their children's
education or their retirement."
The CCPA
study shows that women
are more likely than men to earn less than $10 hour and that a large
percentage of low-wage workers are over the age of 25. Of all women
earning less than $10 hour in Canada, 52% are more than 24 years old.
Canadians rally against Iraq and Afghanistan wars
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
PV Vancouver Bureau
The fourth anniversary of the US-led
aggression against Iraq was met with huge anti-war protests in the
United States, and demonstrations in many other countries. Across
Canada, actions were held in at least 37 cities and towns.
One of the
largest Canadian
rallies saw about 3000-3500 people in the streets of Toronto, organized
by the Stop the War Coalition. Speakers included 15-year-old student
Afnan Al-Hashimi, Niaz Salimi (Canadian Muslim Union), Anton Wagner
(Hiroshima Day Coalition), Kabir Joshi-Vijayan (Toronto Haiti Action
Committee), Nadia Daar (Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid), and Ali
Mallah, member of the Canadian Peace Alliance steering committee and
vice-president of the Canadian Arab Federation.
Ottawa saw a
"spirited, loud,
creative and visual" rally of 500 people, despite snow and a damp,
chilly wind. After music from the activist choir Just Voices, speakers
included United Church minister Brian Cornelius, CUPW National
President Deborah Bourque, Pierre Ducasse (NDP Candidate for
Hull-Aylmer), Canadian Labour Congress vice-president Marie Clarke
Walker, Brent Patterson of the Council of Canadians, and Rosa Kouri,
Director of the Sierra Youth Coalition.
In Hamilton,
about 170 people
marched through downtown, receiving many honks of support from passing
motorists. Participants included the Hamilton Coalition to Stop the
War, the Hamilton and District Labour Council, and a range of other
solidarity and progressive groups.
Typical of
anti-war actions in
smaller centres, about 25 people gathered in Leamington, Ontario, for a
Christian Peacemaker Team prayer vigil and procession, including four
CPT members who have spent time in Iraq. The group walked through
downtown Leamington singing hymns and carrying banners reading "Disarm,
Live In Peace" and "Christian Peacemaker Teams - Getting In The Way".
Braving
pouring rain, 250 people
were out on the streets in Victoria, "chanting the whole time, with
brief stops at the downtown recruiting centre, and then at the federal
building." Speakers talked about the racist war of terror at home and
the historic colonial role of the Canadian State, the invasions of Iraq
and Aghanistan, and the need for a broader pan-Canadian and
international anti-war movement.
Late winter
rains also pounded
Vancouver, where about 1,000 people took part in a march organized by
the broad-based StopWar coalition (not the "Mobilization Against War
and Occupation," which circulated emails and posters claiming to be the
organizers). StopWar co-chair Derrick O'Keefe gave a rousing anti-war
speech, and Valhalla Wilderness Society director Colleen McCrory linked
the horrors of war with the deepening global environmental crisis.
Peace
Alliance Winnipeg organized
a demonstration of about 250 people, followed by a panel discussion. A
large number of high school students from Kelvin, Maples and River East
Collegiates took part; for some it was their first demonstration. March
17 capped a week of activities in Winnipeg, including a screening of
the documentary Why We Fight, a debate on the question "Afghanistan: Is
this Canada's War", and an Anti-War Fest organized by the Student
Christian Movement, the War Resistors Support Campaign and Mondragon
Bookstore.
CUPW activist: "Remove Canadian troops"
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
Speech by
CUPW Prairie Director Cindy McCallum to the March 17 anti-war forum
organized by Peace Alliance Winnipeg
I am pleased to participate here with
you during this international day of protest against the invasion and
occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan.
I do not
claim to be an expert on
Canada's role in propping up the US agenda nor on the details of the
war. I am here because as a woman, and as a member of the working class
in Canada, I have an obligation to women and to the working class of
those countries to speak out against the terror and oppression that
they face because of our assault against them. They are my sisters and
brothers and they are dying because my government has chosen to attack
them. I am here to express outrage at my nation's role in this
international tragedy and to demand the Harper government immediately
remove Canadian troops from combat.
My union, the
Canadian Union of
Postal Workers, is active in many community protests today in Canada
and Quebec. Our national office issued a bulletin to our membership to
remind them why their union is committed to participating in the peace
movement's call for peace and the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan.
CUPW reminded
our members that
this war has a direct effect on our membership in many ways. Firstly,
the Harper government is wasting our resources in having a military
presence in Afghanistan when those resources would be better spent
providing healthcare, social services and real international support.
Secondly, if we fight this key policy of the Harper government, we will
better mobilize to defeat other policies like the attack on women's
rights and childcare. Thirdly, it is a struggle against privatization
in Afghanistan which is a major struggle by our Union in this country.
And finally, it is working people who are being sent to fight and die
and kill other working people.
As a
feminist, I am particularly
concerned about the plight of women in these countries, who are raped,
beaten and oppressed. On IWD this year, the Iraq Freedom Congress
called upon women and men who value equality to protest the occupation
and the violence of sectarian gangs because of the terrible
consequences against women.
They claimed
"In Iraq where
destruction and lawlessness are dominating society, women are the ones
who pay the heaviest price on her dignity and life." They further state
"the occupation forces have opened the doors widely to human rights
violations and women's rights in particular."
Both the Iraq
Freedom Congress
and Amnesty International raise the issue of the imprisonment and
execution of women who are accused of participating in armed resistance
to the occupation. Amnesty identified three of these women scheduled to
be killed by the state despite the fact that they were not allowed
legal counsel during their trial nor to appeal the conviction. Two of
these women (Liqa Muhammad and Wassan Talib) have extremely young
children with them in prison. These children can thank George Bush and
the occupying force for murdering their mothers.
As a trade
unionist I am equally
concerned about the safety of trade unionists in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The world is a dangerous place these days for those who stand up for
workers rights in the face of ever growing corporate power. The ILO
recognizes the right of workers to organize and participate in Unions,
yet the systematic silencing of trade union leaders through
assassination goes on without public outrage.
The Trade
Union Congress of
Britain has released a new book called Hadi Never Died, commemorating
the torture and murder of Hadi Saleh, the International Secretary of
the (now) Iraqi Workers Federation when he tried to rebuild the trade
union movement that had been violently suppressed by Saddam Hussein for
40 years. Hadi's murder sparked a wave of assassinations of trade union
leaders and members. Iraqi teachers appear to be specific targets to
prevent the social justice and stability unions are striving for.
The Iraq
government has done
nothing to change the reality of Saddam's ban on unions and in fact has
increased the oppressive tactics to ensure workers power to defend
themselves and fight for justice and equality is extremely restricted.
Abdullah
Muhsin of the Iraqi
Workers Federation said "Iraq's economy was pulverised by Saddam's
wars, bled by sanctions and further devastated by the invasion, looting
and rampant corruption. Iraq's economy needs emergency investment and
widespread reconstruction. Free and independent unions will play an
important role in making sure investment in Iraq provides quality jobs
and decent public services.
"But unions
are also important in
forming Iraq's democratic future and national identity. Unions are an
antidote to the sectarian poisons of extremism in Iraq," he concluded.
However, it
appears that equality
for people is not the concern of the invasion/occupation forces. They
are clearly more interested in the unrestricted access to resources and
creating an economy that they can exploit.
In Iraq, no
one disputes the fact
that oil is the key. Iraqi workers want to ensure oil remains a public
asset but the invaders are not going to allow that. Oil is their prize
but the rebuilding of destroyed infrastructure and then controlling
those assets are other jewels in the occupation treasure chest. They do
this through privatization - a corporate tool used around the world to
rob the people of their assets.
In
Afghanistan, a housing scandal
occurred because of the manipulation of western funds for
reconstruction. Instead of building homes for the poor, instead of
fixing the tragedy of watching as hundreds of shelterless Afghan people
freeze to death each winter, instead of building small inexpensive
homes for the people; cabinet ministers and friends of the government
took the liberty of awarding themselves prime land and building villas
under the protection of NATO forces.
Corruption is
alive and well in
Afghanistan. NATO forces may be protecting the elite in Afghanistan but
they have been the direct cause of civilian deaths. And those
casualties and deaths get very little attention in the Canadian media.
And the war
is causing Canadian
deaths. Young men and women who are being sacrificed in an old man's
game. How many more bodies will we wrap in a flag and send home to
devastated families. I say enough!
Canada once
had a reputation as a
peace keeping nation. Our UN role gave us honour and friendship around
the world. Our refusal to simply adopt American foreign policy allowed
us to take pride in our independence. But Stephen Harper has reduced us
to be one of the western thugs and bullies by changing our role in
Afghanistan and pacifying his American masters.
The people of
Afghanistan never acted against Canadians - they are not our enemies.
The war in
Iraq was based on a
premise of greed, control and manipulation. It is illegal and immoral
and can not be condoned.
Canadians
should not be part of
an agenda that imposes an unwanted reality on an unwilling people. The
federal government has no right to continue this travesty and now must
take action on our collective call to withdraw from Afghanistan and
stop supporting the US in Iraq.
Afghans turning against Canadian troops
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
By Kimball
Cariou
Quoting from a survey about to be
released by the Senlis Council think tank, Globe and Mail correspondent
Doug Saunders reported on March 19 that "Afghan civilians are
increasingly turning against Canadian troops and their country's
government and toward support of the Taliban."
A team of 50
researchers polled
17,000 Afghan men in randomly selected districts in the southeastern
Afghan provinces of Kandahar (where Canadian troops are fighting),
Helmand (British troops) and Nangarhar (U.S. forces) between March 3
and March 12. The survey finds that Afghan men say they are being
driven to support the Taliban because of disillusionment with the NATO
military effort and poverty created by the continuing conflict.
"Across the
south, the majority
of survey respondents both worry about being able to feed their
families, and do not believe that the Afghan government and the
international troops are helping them," the Senlis report concludes.
"Afghanis in southern Afghanistan are increasingly prepared to admit
their support for the Taliban, and the belief that the government and
the international community will not be able to defeat the Taliban is
widespread in the southern provinces."
The Senlis
Council is a
Brussels-based think tank that began as a European drug-policy
organization, but has become heavily involved in Afghanistan, where it
argues in favour of allowing Afghans to continue growing opium poppies
for medicinal purposes.
The survey
shows that 27 per cent
of Afghans in the south now openly support the Taliban. The surveyors
said the number is likely higher because some respondents are wary of
admitting support to a Westerner.
When asked,
"Are the
international troops helping you personally," only 19 per cent answered
yes (in regions with U.S. soldiers in control, only 6.5 per cent said
yes). And 80.3 per cent say they worry about feeding their families.
"The
widespread perception of
locals is that the international community is not helping to improve
their lives," the survey concludes. "The Taliban has been able to
easily and effectively capitalize on this by providing protection from
forced eradication [of poppy crops] and employment to many."
The study
found that 72 per cent
of men in the region know how to fire a weapon, making them potential
Taliban recruits. The average annual income in the region of $747
(U.S.) is equivalent to two months pay for a Taliban fighter.
Only 48 per
cent of southern
Afghans now believe that their government and NATO are capable of
defeating the Taliban. Similar surveys taken at the end of 2001 showed
overwhelming faith in the success of the war against the Taliban.
The report
notes that the
military effort to defeat the Taliban has eclipsed, and often
undermined, efforts to improve living conditions for Afghans and
rebuild their government and civil society. Earlier in March, Gordon
Smith of the Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute, a
Calgary-based pro-war think tank, concluded that the "vital" military
operation is failing because it is inadequately supported by
humanitarian efforts.
Listen, Yankee - The message that was ignored
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
What the
Cubans
are saying and doing today, other hungry peoples in Latin America are
going to be saying and doing tomorrow. - C. Wright Mills, 1960
By Manuel E.
Yepe, Havana, March 2007
Forty-seven years ago, in 1960, a book
published in the United States, Listen,
Yankee,
warned the government of that nation about the great historical mistake
it was committing due to its inability to understand the outreach and
meaning of the Cuban revolution.
The
worthiness of the warning
derived from the fact that it came from one of the leading sociologists
of the time in the US, Charles Wright Mills (1916-1962).
In January
1959, when the victory
of the Cuban revolution took place, Wright Mills was already an
outstanding scholar for his works The
Power Elite; White-collar (The American Middle Classes) and The Sociological Imagination,
among others. Considered an acute analyst of everyday life in the
United States, his sharp comments in relevant publications frequently
triggered harsh polemics. He warned about the degradation of democracy
through the social control exercised by the oligarchies, the
bureaucratization of industrial society and the techniques applied for
the control of workers.
Wright Mills
also studied the
role played by the media by means of adulterating information and
manipulating public opinion in order to profit the elites, while
debasing the public scenario by simulating a democratic debate. He was
probably the first author in the United States stating that the
overflow of information does not favour communication but, on the
contrary, creates a real problem of assimilation.
It was
acknowledged that C.W.
Mills had an amazing sense of anticipation in his analysis, which
validated his sociological arguments. The soundness of this assessment
is confirmed by Listen, Yankee in light of the present situation in
Latin America.
Three and a
half days of
conversations with then-Prime Minister Fidel Castro, five or six more
days with the delegates of the Ramon Vallejo National Institute for the
Agrarian Reform, and interviews with many other Cuban leaders and a
number of peasants, workers, students and housewives, in August 1960
supplied the arguments in the book.
Readers find
a warning to
American society, rather than to the U.S. government, that the Cuban
revolution might not simply be an isolated accident, but the beginning
of a succession of similar scenarios in the entire underdeveloped
world, especially in Latin America.
Wright Mills
presents eight
successive letters from a figurative Cuban revolutionary protagonist
who, sometimes with arrogance, other times with serenity, but always
with pride, voices the feelings that the author gathered in our country.
One of these
eight letters
proclaims that "we Cubans are part of Latin America - not of North
America. Our history is not part of your history; it is part of Latin
American history. And Latin America is 180,000,000 people, growing
faster than you are growing, and scattered over a territory more than
twice as large as the USA. Like all of Latin America, we're fed up with
what your corporations and what your governments do down here. They've
dominated us long enough, we've said it to ourselves now. Your
government supported Batista right up to the last minute of his
gangster regime. But now Cuba is not just another island in the
Caribbean. The Caribbean is not a North American lake. All that, that's
over."
Wright Mills
reasons in the
initial note to the reader that: "The voice of Cuba today is the voice
of revolutionary euphoria. It is also an angry voice. I am trying to
explain something of all this along with the Cubans' reasons for it.
For their reasons are not only theirs: they are the reasons of the
entire hungry world."
He shows an
exact understanding
of the Cuban political situation when he speaks his mind about the
electoral option promoted by US media, and the internal
counterrevolution which Washington was trying to provide oxygen.
In his final
note to the reader
Wright Mills declares: "I share the view of every competent observer
that in any election the victory of the fidelistas will be
overwhelming. But what seems to me more relevant to the question is
that no matter how elections were organized, and no matter how they may
be supervised by an international agency, such a victory would be quite
meaningless. To have meaningful elections it is necessary to have at
least two political parties and it would be necessary for these parties
to campaign on some range of issues. The only issue in Cuba today is
the revolution, conceived by the Cuban government primarily as economic
and educational construction and as military defense of Cuban
sovereignty. Any party that campaigned today against the revolution and
against the present Government's management of it would probably be set
upon by the majority of the people of Cuba. So I think it must be faced
up to: a real election is an impossible and meaningless idea. It will
only be made meaningful by deliberately giving institutional form to
the counterrevolution, and that today would be unacceptable to the
immense majority of the people of Cuba. The absence of elections
signifies absence of democracy only on the formal assumption that the
electoral process is at all times and in all places indispensable to
democracy. But be that as it may, an election in Cuba is at the present
time an impossible and meaningless demand."
Fifteen years
later, in 1975,
Cuba institutionalized its major social and political revolutionary
achievements in a new Constitution discussed and approved by all its
citizens, as well as a self-developed electoral system, truly
democratic and participative, very different from the US system. The
ideas expressed in the book were confirmed: the US electoral model is
not a valid paradigm for the underdeveloped
countries.
Wright Mills
clearly identifies
the historical antecedents, economic roots and universal outreach of
U.S. imperialism expressed in its Cuban policies, when the Cuban
revolutionary character states that "there cannot be peace - by which
we mean real understanding - between North and South America as long as
these Yankee corporations own the riches of our countries. Because with
this kind of ownership goes the real control of the politics of our
countries... That's not ideology. That's just a plain fact that we have
lived in Cuba, and that most of Latin America is still living."
In his own
final observations,
Mills prefers not to go so deep into the question and states that "the
policies the United States has pursued and is still pursuing against
Cuba are based upon a profound ignorance, and are shot through with
hysteria."
The
shamelessly declared
imperialist objective to bring democracy to Cuba was also rejected by
the "Cuban revolutionary" created by Wright Mills 47 years ago when he
says: "We don't know what you mean by the word `democratic' but if what
we are doing isn't democratic, then we don't want democracy. And if you
identify a free society with what you have in North America, please
know that we don't. We've tried that kind of political system in Cuba.
Maybe it works for you - that's your business; it certainly did not
work for us."
C. Wright
Mills did not have a
formal political militancy and he was neither a communist nor an
anticommunist. He had studied and written about Marxism, and evidently
he felt attracted by the Cuban revolution. "Were I a Cuban, I have no
doubt that I would be working with all my effort for the success of my
revolution. But I am not a Cuban. I am a Yankee."
And, as an
American, he
formulated a recommendation to the government of his country in the
words of the protagonist of his book: "You ought to use Cuba as The
Case - The Case in which to establish the way you are going to act when
there are revolutions in hungry countries everywhere in the world."
Recently,
Cuba was visited by the
famed U.S. writer Gore Vidal, accompanied by other fellow citizens
among whom I recognized Saul Landau, an outstanding writer, political
scientist, filmmaker and journalist who, as a very young and bright
intellectual, worked with Charles Wright Mills in the days of Listen, Yankee. He could have been
the one who attracted Mills to the studies of the Cuban revolution.
At the
beginning of 1960, they
and many other excellent intellectuals created the Fair Play for Cuba
Committee in New York. Not without serious risks to their lives, they
pronounced themselves against a policy that, as they foresaw and
advised, would sink their country in dishonour.
Sadly, the
message was never listened to.
(Manuel
E. Yepe is a lawyer, economist and social scientist. He is a professor
at the Raul Roa Higher Institute of International Relations in Havana,
and Secretary of the Cuban Peace Movement.)
What's Left
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
NEW
WESTMINSTER, B.C.
World
Peace Forum - World
Peace Forum: Beyond 2006, session to discuss the road ahead for the
peace movement, Sat., April 14, 9 am to 5 pm, cash bar social to 7:30
pm, CAW Canada Union Hall, 326 12th St.
VICTORIA,
BC
10th
Annual Golden Corporate Piggie Awards - local
activists present skits and music on the most outrageous corporate
activities during the past year. Sunday, April 1, 2 pm, Roxy Theatre on
Quadra St., by donation. Info 384-6893
VANCOUVER,
BC
Workers
deserve a Fair Day's Pay - forum
organized by Hospital Employees Union, 6:30- 8:30 pm, Sunday, April 1,
Public Library, 350 W. Georgia.
What's
up with St. Paul's Hospital? P3? Relocation? Privatization? - find out more, Sunday,
April 1, 2-4 pm, 870 Denman St. Speakers: Stuart Murray (CCPA
Researcher), Aaron Jasper (Save St. Paul’s Coalition), Maryann Abbs (BC
Health Coalition), Coalition), call 604-681-7945.
Bhopal:
injustice, struggle and hope - with
Satinath
Sarangi, organized by Vancouver & District Labour Council, Tue.
April 3, 7:30 pm, SFU Harbour Centre, 604-827-3010 for details.
Annual
Spring Bazaar - Sat.,
April 21, 11-3, at the Russian Hall, 600 Campbell Ave., donations
welcome.
Reception
for David Rovics - meet
and hear the U.S. folksinger, and enjoy Arabic snacks and refreshments,
admission by donation, Thursday, April 26, 7-9:30 pm, Palestine
Community Centre, 1874 Kingsway, 604-676-3611.
PV
Victory Banquet - Sat., PV
Victory Banquet, Sat., June 9, 6 pm, Russian Hall, 600 Campbell Ave.,
call 604-255-2041 for tickets and info.
StopWar.ca
- coalition meetings on 2nd & 4th Wednesdays, 5;30
pm, Maritime Labour Centre, 1880 Triumph St., see http://www.stopwar.ca
for updates.
Better
Pay for Low-Wage workers
- public forum,6:30 pm, Sunday, April 1,
Library main branch, see story on page 2 for full information.
Annual
Spring Bazaar
- Sat., April 21, 11-3, at
the Russian Hall,
600 Campbell Ave., donations welcome.
TORONTO,
ON
Building
Power - Social and Political Transformations in Latin America,
conference April 13-14 at Ryerson University, info at
www.ryerson.ca/socialjustice.
People's
Voice evening - Sat., April 14, 6 pm to midnight,
290A Danforth Ave., with music by Wally Brooker Saxawoogie Jazz, food,
kool beverages - help raise
$20,000 in Ontario for People’s Voice Drive. Tickets $20
($10 unemployed),
for info call
416-469-2446.
Cuban
Palador - (Cuban Restaurant in a private home)-
Sat., April 21,
209 Oakwood Avenue W., 6-9 pm, $15 for Cuban food, coffee, flan and
music, proceeds to People’s Voice, sponsored by Public Sector Workers
Club and Parkdale Club. For info or reservations, 416-654-7105.
Mayworks
Festival of Working People and the Arts - April 28 - May 6, for
info on events visit www.mayworks.ca, or contact publicist Matthew
Adams, 416-762-0260.
People's
Voice Forums - at the
GCDO Hall, 290 Danforth Ave. Thursday,
April 26, 7:30 pm, topic to be announced; Thursday, May 31, 7:30 pm,
lawyer Barbara Jackman on “Security Certificates”. Call 416-469-2446
for details of April event.
OTTAWA,
ON
Integrate
This! - teach-in challenging
the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, March
30 - April 1, Ottawa Technical High School, 440 Albert St., organized
by
Council of Canadians, CCPA, Canadian Labour Congress, and others. For
info visit http://www.integratethis.ca or
call 1-800-387-7177.
Women
Resisting Poverty & Exclusion - May 4-6, conference organized by Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women, for info, visit the CRIAW website: http://www.criaw-icref.ca/indexFrame_e.htm
MONTREAL,
QC
Vigil
against occupation of Palestine -
every Friday, noon to 1 pm, at Israeli Consulate, corner of Peel and
Rene Levesque. For info: Palestinians And Jews United, 961-3928.
People's Voice deadlines:
APRIL 16-30 issue: Thursday, April 5
MAY 1-15 issue: Thursday, April 19
Send submissions to PV Editorial
Office, 706 Clark Drive, Vancouver,
V5L 3J1, pvoice@telus.net
|
People’s Voice: News for
people,
not for profit!
Our 2007 Fund
Appeal
for $50,000
Three weeks into the 2007 People’s
Voice Fund Drive, the contributions
are starting to pour in. As of
the March 24-25 weekend, we
have received $8984, or 18% of
our $50,000 target.
At the moment, British Columbia leads
the pack, with $5419, or
almost 25% of their $22,000
provincial goal. Ontario has
raised $3017, just over 15% of
their $20,000 target. Donations are
also starting to arrive from
other provinces following our
mailout in early March.
We want to give particular recognition
to several strong supporters of
People’s Voice. This year’s
$1000 Club so far includes Paul
Belanger and Anthony Grinkus
from British Columbia, and
Toronto’s Ted Buck. Every
year, recognising the vital
importance of the working class
press, these readers are among
the most generous of our contributors.
Other sizable early contributions have come in from the Association of Greek Canadian Veterans (who valiantly fought fascism in their homeland), Barry Lord, Craig Pritchett, A. Cordoni, Keith Ralston, Grace Stevens, and Orest Moysiuk. Your solidarity is deeply appreciated.
Why is People’s Voice so
important? Just look through
the pages of the issue in your
hands. While the corporate
media blacked out voices of
opposition to the Tory budget,
we have extensive coverage of
the sharp criticisms raised by
the labour and people’s movements.
The mainstream media largely
ignored the March 17 anti-war
actions, but People’s Voice
helped build support for these
peace demonstrations, and copies
of the paper were handed out
to thousands of protesters. The problems
faced by CN Rail workers are
irrelevant to the big corporations which dominate the Canadian media, but we keep digging into the real issues faced by all trade unionists in Canada.
Our supporters are busy organizing some great fundraisers this spring. Readers in the Toronto area can look forward to an evening of incredible music with Wally Brooker’s Saxawoogie Jazz, plus great food and refreshments on Saturday, April 14, from 6 pm to midnight. It’s all happening at the GCDO Hall, 290 Danforth Ave., near the Chester station. Call 416-469-2446 for full details.
Toronto's Public Sector Workers
and Parkdale clubs are hosting
a Cuban Palador (home restaurant)
for PV, on Sat., April 26, 6
to 9 pm, at 209 Oakwood Ave.
For just $15 you get great
Cuban food, coffee and music.
Call 416-654-7105 for
information and tickets.
The 15th Annual People’s Voice
Victory Banquet will take place at the Russian Hall (600
Campbell Ave.) in Vancouver on Saturday, June 9 - even if an election
is underway! Our guest speaker this year will be Brigid Kemp, President
of the South Okanagan Boundary Labour Council, bringing a message of
labour militancy in the struggle for peace, jobs, democracy, and social justice.
Finally, a reminder about our “People’s Voice Shopping Bag” special
Fund Drive promotion. As the ad below shows, we have several
items to offer for your contributions, ranging from music to T-shirts
to great reading. Also, all PV subs renewed in the first four months of
2007 will be credited for 13 months at the price of 12 months.
People’s Voice
SHOPPING BAG
BOOK
Not One More Death, essays condemning the US war against Iraq, by John le Carré, Richard Dawkins,
Brian Eno, Michel Faber,
Harold Pinter, and Haifa
Zangana
CALENDAR
People’s
Voice 2007 antiwar calendar
SUBSCRIPTION
a
12 month complimentary subscription
to People’s Voice (keep it or
give it to a friend)
Che T-Shirt
Surprise Music CD
Send
your phone number with your donation,
and we will contact you about your
choice of music CD, or your T-shirt
size before shipping
Here’s
How It Works:
For
a $100 Donation ... One item of your choice
$200 Donation ............
Choose two items
$300 Donation ............
Choose three items
$400 Donation ............
Choose four items
$500 Donation ............
Choose five items
For
a donation of $1000 or more, take the whole bag and we will provide a lifetime subscription for you or
a friend of your choice.
All
subs renewed in the first four months of 2007 will be credited for 13 months at the price of 12 months ($25).
Offer expires April 30.
Send all requests and donations to PV
Business Office: 173 West Ave
North, Hamilton, ON, L8L 5C7.
|
Failing marks
on environment, social issues
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
Environmental and
social justice groups slammed
the March 19 federal Tory
budget for failing to tackle
crucial issues.
The budget “lacks a tangible plan
and crucial financial detail to address
the top concern of Canadians -
global warming,” said the David
Suzuki Foundation.
“When it comes to the
environment, this federal
budget largely recycles the
previous government’s climate
change programs, only with less
money,” said Dale Marshall of the Suzuki Foundation.
Marshall welcomed the budget’s allocation of $110 million to protect the habitat of species at risk, and the carbon tax on gasguzzling vehicles.
But he said “it’s clear the government chose to ignore their international
obligation to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions,” falling well short of the “massive scale-up” of efforts to tackle climate change that the former environment commissioner called for last fall.
The budget provides just $19 million over two years for marine conservation, a far cry from the $600 million environment groups say is needed to protect Canada’s oceans and coastlines. The government pledged less than three per cent of the funds required for its own Oceans Action Plan to protect fish stocks from collapse.
The budget “entirely ignores Canada’s nation-wide affordable housing crisis and homelessness disaster,” said the Wellesley Institute, which researches the social determinants of health, “even though at least 1.5 million households (more than 4 million women, men and children) are officially classified as being in `core housing need’, and hundreds of thousands of Canadians experience homelessness annually.”
While there are “modest
increases” in some social
programs (such as elderly
benefits, and health and social transfers), the Institute said, "the
signifant spending increases are in the 'crime and terror' agenda, such as almost $1 billion in spending over the next two years on the military (up $354 million); federal jails (up $106 million); Canadian Security Intelligence Service (up $80 million); and an additional $200 million for Afghanistan.”
Corporations and the wealthy received close to $1.5 billion in tax cuts over the next two years in the March 19 budget, which continues the trend of individual Canadians picking up a bigger share of federal taxes.
As the Institute pointed out, “Personal taxpayers will pay $3.5 billion more in income taxes in fiscal 2007 for a total of $115 billion, while corporations will only pay $1.3 billion more in fiscal 2007 for a total of $36 billion. In fiscal 2008, corporate income taxes will actually drop by $1 billion while personal income taxes will increase by another $5.6 billion. In recent years, corporate profits have been at record levels, yet the corporate share of the federal tax pie is shrinking.”
The growing housing crisis in Canada “was not even hinted at” in the budget, said Sharon Chisholm of the Canadian Housing and Renewal Association. “Canada still has 1.5 million households in need of housing assistance and waiting lists of 12 years and more for social housing in many cities. Long term, sustainable funding should be provided by the federal government to support the capacity of communities to respond to housing need. Canada can do better.”
Campaign 2000, a coalition of 120 groups which focuses on the struggle to eliminate child and family poverty, reacted with dismay to the budget claim to “help people achieve a better life for themselves and their families.”
“Despite ample, double-digit budget surpluses, the federal government chose not to craft a poverty reduction budget that would substantially improve life chances for low and modest income children and their families,” said Campaign 2000. “There is a notable absence of income supports for families in deep poverty, nor for affordable and social housing, nor are there substantial investments in early learning and child care services - the key policies that would help make a dent in Canada’s 17.7% child poverty rate. Instead, the budget announced a uniform child tax credit and launched a modest tax credit for low wage workers while omitting the re-institution of the federal minimum wage.”
“The Child Tax Credit, which will cost $1.5 billion annually, is an ineffective use of public funds,” said Campaign 2000 national coordinator Laurel Rothman. “Once again, the federal government has used a blunt tax measure in which the family with children earning $35,000 is treated the same as the family earning $235,000. Furthermore, the lowest income families who do not pay taxes will not benefit.”
Campaign 2000 calls for a
longterm, sustained and well
financed strategy to reduce
child and family poverty,
including: $5 billion per year
by 2010 for a national system of
high quality early learning and child
care; and an affordable housing strategy
to build 25,000 new affordable
units annually.
ASEAN and ILO to address labour issues
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the International Labour Office (ILO) have signed a Cooperation Agreement to address labour and employment issues and to promote social progress in the region.
ILO Director-General Juan Somavia said the agreement was of strategic importance to the realisation of the Asian Decent Work Decade launched at the ILO Regional Meeting last year.
“It provides a strong basis to work together in an effort to ensure that regional integration contains a strong social dimension and leads to a fair globalisation,” he said.
Under the agreement, the Asean secretariat
and ILO will cooperate to
implement projects in the areas of
occupational health and safety, HIV/AIDS
and the workplace, the employment
implications of trade liberalisation,
youth employment, vocational
training, social security and
labour migration.
The 10-nation ASEAN has a population
of more than 560 million, spending
more than US$400 billion every
year, and a labour force of
330 million. Between 2000 and
2006, GDP growth in the region averaged
5.7 per cent annually, but the
unemployment rate rose
from five per cent to 6.6 per cent
during the same period.
CAFTA
fails to protect workers
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
When President Bush visited Guatemala in March, he talked about how
free trade, especially the Central America Free Trade Agreement
(CAFTA), can spread opportunity, provide jobs and help lift people out
of poverty.
But the Guatemala that Bush and his heavily guarded entourage did not
see is the one that workers in that country know all too well - a
nation where children and adults are forced to work in sweatshops for
little pay and under terrible conditions, where workers’ rights are
ignored or not enforced.
Consider what Bush did not talk about in Guatemala:
* Employees trying to form a union in a plant making Jones Apparel
Group garments lost their jobs last October and have not been reinstated, despite repeated allegations of violations of the company’s code of conduct by organizations such as United Students
Against Sweatshops, the Worker Rights Consortium and the International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers’ Federation.
* The January murder of the head of the port workers union, Pedro Zamora, then in the midst of contentious negotiations with management.
* Less than 10 miles from where
Bush spoke, children as young
as 13 years old work in a
foodprocessing plant under
deplorable conditions,
according to the radio program
“Democracy Now.”
As Washington Post reporter Peter Goodman wrote March 16: “Nearly two years have passed since the countries of Central America vowed to strengthen worker rights as they sought votes in Congress for the Central American Free Trade Agreement, or CAFTA. Yet there has been little if any progress, according to diplomats, labor inspectors, workers and managers.”
With Congress poised to consider several trade bills in the next few months, AFL-CIO Legislation Director William Samuel wrote to members of both houses, pointing out the Post article. He told the lawmakers the article illustrates a message working families have been delivering for years: The model for U.S. trade deals such as CAFTA and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) before it has failed to improve working conditions anywhere.
(James
Parks, AFL-CIO Now)
Haiti to receive doctors and development funds
from Cuba and Venezuela
(The
following article is from
the April 1-15,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
Cuba and Venezuela
have created a $1 billion US fund to help Haiti,
with resources devoted to purchase equipment, build dwellings and
provide assistance to the Cuban doctors to be deployed in Haiti. Cuba
will grant scholarships to 800 Haitians taking medical studies in
Havana.
In a joint news conference with Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez,
Haitian President Rene Preval announced on March 12 that several
cooperation agreements were signed during a tripartite meeting with
Cuban State Council Vice-President Esteban Lazo.
“In short time, with Cuban help and cooperation, integral healthcare
will be provided in all Haitian communities,” Preval explained.
“Further, we have a group of Haitians taking medical studies in Cuba.
They are to replace Cuban doctors. Besides, Venezuela has provided $20
million in humanitarian aid to help shore up this cooperation
initiative in the healthcare area.”
The meeting, held in the National Palace, the Haitian Government
headquarters, was joined via telephone by Fidel Castro, who called
Chavez, Preval and Lazo to take part in the ceremony sealing the
tripartite agreement.
Besides the $1 billion fund, President Chavez officially announced that
Venezuelan state-run Economic and Social Development Bank (Bandes)
would create a $20 million fund to finance development projects in
Haiti. Other announcements included $57 million to overhaul Haitian
airports, and a new deal under which Venezuela is to provide 7,000
barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil to the island, besides the 7,000 bpd
it currently provides to Haiti under Petrocaribe. Venezuela has also
undertaken to install four electric powerhouses with an overall
capacity of 100 megawatts in Port-au- Prince, Cap Haitien and Gonaives.