End the wars of occupation in Iraq and
Afghanistan
(The
following article is from
the February 1-28,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
Joint statement from the Canadian Peace
Alliance and the Québec-based Collectif échec a la
guerre, Jan. 17, 2007
On the
occasion of the 4th anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, March 17th
2007: We demand the end of the wars of occupation in Iraq and
Afghanistan!
On 10 January
2007, George W. Bush made the announcement that the US would send
21,500 more troops to Iraq. A few weeks earlier, Stephen Harper was
insisting that members of NATO should provide more combat troops in
Afghanistan. This is the same dead-end recipe to "win the hearts and
minds" of the Iraqi and Afghan people! The Canadian Peace Alliance and
Collectif échec a la guerre reject these war policies and call
on the people of Quebec and Canada to participate in a Canada-wide day
of action, on March 17th, against the wars of occupation in Iraq and
Afghanistan.
In Iraq
In the
aftermath of the attacks of September 11th 2001, while launching its
"war on terror" and invading Afghanistan, the Bush administration was
already intent on occupying Iraq. After twelve years of merciless
sanctions which had killed more than one million people in Iraq, four
years of occupation, false promises of democracy and reconstruction
have only resulted in more deaths and devastation, and plunged the
country into a civil war.
In October
2006, the medical journal The Lancet
estimated that 655,000 people had died in Iraq following the invasion.
Oil production, electricity production, and the accessibility of
drinkable water are all at lower levels presently as compared to four
years ago, under sanctions! According to the estimates of the Office of
the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), out of a
total population of 26 million, 2 million Iraqis have fled to
neighbouring countries and an additional 1.7 million are internally
displaced persons: While many of them were displaced before 2003,
increasing numbers of Iraqis are now fleeing escalating sectarian,
ethnic and generalised violence. In 2006 alone, UNHCR estimates that
nearly 500,000 Iraqis fled to other areas inside the country and that
40,000 to 50,000 continue to flee their homes every month.
In Afghanistan
In
Afghanistan, a country which was already ravaged by 30 years of war,
the situation is also very bleak after more than five years of "allied"
military occupation. According to Human Rights Watch, more than half of
the Members of Parliament elected in September 2005 are linked to armed
groups, guilty of past human rights violations; the illegal growing and
processing of poppies has again become the main economic activity of
the country (Afghanistan provides more than 90% of world heroin).
According to Amnesty International, thousands of Afghans have been
tortured by the US army or armed Afghan groups under its control.
According to the UNHCR, there are still more than 3,000,000 Afghan
refugees in Pakistan and Iran, and approximately 120,000 internally
displaced in Afghanistan.
Finally, according to WOMANKIND
Worldwide, after five years and contrary to media-fed illusions, it is
imperative that the media, donor governments, international
organisations and the Afghan government acknowledge the lack of
progress in the domain of women's rights and immediately take action in
key areas of education, the legal system, security services,
healthcare, and livelihoods to transform paper rights to rights in
practice.
Wars of conquest of the US Empire
and its allies
The Canadian
Peace Alliance and Collectif échec a la guerre refuse to buy the
deceitful message of the "war on terror" and so-called support of the
Iraqi and Afghan peoples towards democracy and reconstruction in their
countries. What we are dealing with is foreign control imposed by force
led by the United States government and supported by Canadian economic
and political elites to secure control of the resources of the Middle
East and Central Asia. This is clearly indicated not only by the
results achieved, but also by comparing the level of expenses committed
by our countries. Thus, on 10 January 2007, while announcing a one
billion dollar programme to sustain employment in Iraq, President Bush
is about to request 100 billion dollars to pursue his wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan!
In Canada,
the simultaneous announcements by ministers Peter McKay and
Josée Verner of projects totalling about 20 million dollars in
Afghanistan - 10 million to pay police salaries, 8.8 millions for
landmine removal and 1.9 million to stimulate community development in
Kandahar - are mere crumbs when one remembers that Canada wastes more
than one billion dollars per year to continue its war in that country.
END the wars of occupation in Iraq and
Afghanistan.
BRING Canadian and US troops home
immediately.
REJECT the Canada-US military
partnership.
Women's groups force meeting with Bev Oda
(The
following article is from
the February 1-28,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
By
Kimball Cariou
The fight
continues to reverse the Harper government's cancellation of funding
for women's equality programs before the cuts take effect on March 31.
On Jan. 18,
over 100 people rallied against the cuts in pouring rain outside the
Sinclair Centre in downtown Vancouver, where the regional Status of
Women Canada office is located. After the rally, a number of women
occupied the SWC office, demanding a meeting with Bev Oda, Minister of
Canadian Heritage and Status of Women.
As a result,
the representatives of the BC Coalition for Women's Equality and Human
Rights in Canada, an ad hoc coalition of women's organizations, met
with Oda by teleconference for one hour the following day.
Coalition
representatives expressed disappointment with Minister Oda's
explanations and defense of the Harper government's decisions to:
- slash $5 million dollars from the
SWC budget
- close 12 of 16 regional offices of
SWC
- remove women's equality from the
program mandate
- make research, advocacy and lobbying
ineligible for funding
- cancel the Court Challenges Program
- refuse to move forward on proactive
pay equity legislation
- cancel the Pan-Canadian child-care
program
- fail to move forward on its CEDAW
obligations.
In the face
of Oda's defense of these decisions, the Coalition said it is
determined to redouble efforts to have them reversed.
Minister Oda
did agree to meet with BC women's groups to discuss these issues
further, but no date has been fixed. The Coalition asked that this
meeting take place as soon as possible. Given that the House of Commons
will be in session January 29, representatives advised Oda that they
were available to meet evenings or weekends.
Cecily
Nicholson, of Vancouver Status of Women, noted that thousands of women
across the country have expressed their dismay about these decisions.
"And our
concerns are shared." says Fatima Jaffer, spokesperson for the
Coalition. "Provincial and Territorial ministers also highlighted their
dissatisfaction with Minister Oda's leadership. They decided not to
invite the Minister to their meeting early February in Toronto to plot
a national strategy because they say she shows so little interest in
women's issues."
Housing out of reach for minimum wage earners
(The
following article is from
the February 1-28,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
PV
Vancouver Bureau
A recent
report from the Canadian Housing and Renewal Association finds that
"rising rent levels in all 28 Canadian Census Metropolitan areas have
resulted in an increase in the minimum housing wage required in all of
these cities."
The "minimum
housing wage" measures the hourly wages that a person or household must
earn to afford an average rent unit without paying more than the norm
of 30% of before-tax income for housing.
An hourly
wage of more than $10 is necessary to afford a small bachelor unit in
ten of Canada's largest cities. For families requiring a three-bedroom
unit, over $15/hr is required in 17 cities. By comparison, the highest
minimum hourly wage is only $8/hr (British Columbia), while most
provinces have a minimum wage of $7 to $7.75.
Single
parent families with only one wage earner and difficulty working long
hours face the greatest challenge. In Vancouver, Calgary and Toronto, a
single parent must find a job paying almost three times the minimum
wage to cover the rent for an average two or three bedroom apartment.
Vancouver and
Toronto remain the most expensive cities for rents, but Calgary (3rd)
and Edmonton (9th) recorded the greatest shift in the overall ranking
compared with 2005. Montreal ranks 20th among the 28 census
metropolitan areas.
In Toronto, a
single person must earn more than $14/hr to afford an average rent
bachelor, while a family needs a combined income of almost $25/hr.
For singles
there are 23 cities where full time employment at minimum wage is not
sufficient to afford an average bachelor unit.
Among
families seeking a two-bedroom unit, assuming there are two full-time
workers, the average two-bedroom unit is affordable in only ten of the
28 cities (the average three bedroom unit is affordable in 14 of the
cities).
Among cities
requiring more workers in each household to afford a three-bed unit,
Kitchener, Kingston and London stand out. These cities have large
university populations and students often share larger units, a pattern
which influences the type of units built and to boost demand. The
result is higher rent levels for the larger units, often crowding out
low-income families that also seek these units.
The CHRA
comments that this data "shows that the `just get a job' mantra often
directed at the poor or homeless is not a sufficient step to address
the problem of housing affordability - which reinforces poverty by
causing the person or household to spend too much for housing, leaving
too little for other necessities."
The report
also notes a 3.2% increase in rents for the country as a whole last
year (Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation annual rental survey,
Dec. 2006). By comparison, the average hourly wage across Canada in
November 2006 was just over $20/hr, up 2.9% since November 2005.
Rents
skyrocketed in Calgary (19.5%) and Edmonton (9.9%), reflecting the
energy boom and migration into Alberta. But the average increase in
Alberta's average wages was just 6.3%.
Another CMHC
website report recently noted that while Canadian homeowners saw a 4.5%
increase in median real after-tax household incomes between 1990 and
2004, income for renters actually dropped 4.8 per cent.
Not
surprisingly, data from the 2001 Census reveals that the lower the
income, the higher the proportion of one-person households, lone-parent
households and seniors. The proportion of income spent on shelter is
significantly higher for the bottom income group, where about 60 per
cent of households are in "core housing need." On average, these
households pay close to half their monthly income on shelter.
(The
following article is from
the February 1-28,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
PV
Vancouver Bureau
Demonstrators
wearing orange jump suits with black hoods have increasingly become the
international symbol of protest against indefinite detention and
torture. Such images sprouted across Canada between January 11-15, the
fifth anniversary of the opening of the notorious prison in Guantanamo
Bay, Cuban territory occupied by the U.S. military. The protests called
for an end to secret trial security certificates and the closure of
"Guantanamo North," the Kingston Immigration Holding Centre on the
premises of Millhaven Penitentiary, where three certificate detainees
remain imprisoned.
Following the
protests, Mohammad Mahjoub, who began a hunger strike on Nov. 25, and
Mahmoud Jaballah and Hassan Almrei (December 6), continued their hunger
strikes. The men are being detained without charge, on the basis of
secret evidence neither they nor their lawyers are allowed to see.
Protesting their
conditions of detention, including the denial of medical care, the men
greeted 2007 with an open appeal to Canadian supporters to demonstrate
on their behalf. That letter can be found at http://www.homesnotbombs.ca/openletter.htm.
In response,
film screenings, public events, vigils, and delegations to MPs' offices
took place in Nanaimo, Victoria, Vancouver, Penticton, Kelowna,
Winnipeg, Owen Sound, Durham, Midland, London, Kitchener, Peterborough,
Belleville, Bath, Kingston, Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, Fredericton, St.
John's, Halifax, and elsewhere.
The federal
government has refused to negotiate with the men, calling their hunger
strike a "choice," or a "voluntary fast." Unlike at Metro West
Detention Centre, where the men, even in solitary confinement, had
their vital signs checked on a daily basis during such hunger strikes,
there has been no such care offered to the men in their "living unit"
since the hunger strike began.
One other
man, Mohamed Harkat, held for three and a half years, is currently
"out" on some of the most severe restrictions on human liberty ever
imposed in a Canadian bail release. He too has never been charged or
provided with a fair trial; he too continues to live under the threat
of deportation to torture.
"Guantanamo
North," a six-cell, multi-million dollar prison which opened in April
2006, was built specifically for non-citizens detained without charge
or trial on secret information. This unprecedented move signalled the
government's intention to continue its policy of "security
certificates", over widespread public objections and against the
recommendations of human rights organizations and three UN committees,
and despite a pending Supreme Court decision on the constitutionality
of security certificates and an unfinished parliamentary review.
Concerned
readers are urged to contact Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day (tel.
613-995-1702, fax 613-995-1154, email day.s@parl.gc.ca,
Immigration Minister Diane
Finley (tel. 866-496-3400),
and Prime Minister Stephen Harper
(tel. 613-992-4211, fax 613-941-6900, email pm@pm.gc.ca to ask several important questions:
1. Why can't the men be provided with
medical care?
2. Why can't the federal government
appoint a neutral mediator to immediately deal with the problems, and
set up a system to deal with ongoing issues that is balanced and fair?
3. Will the men have to die for a
little bit of dignity?
4. If the Kingston Immigration Holding
Centre will not send in health care staff (something they did before
September), will the government allow an independent outside doctor to
check on the men, and to provide some of the basic care that has been
denied to them?
Meanwhile,
February 18 will mark two years since Adil Charkaoui was released from
21 months of detention without charge or trial in Montreal, only to be
placed under arbitrary conditions which severely restrict his liberty
and that of his entire family. He remains under an active threat of
deportation to torture, which takes its toll, day-by-day, on him and
his family.
The
Montreal-based Coalition Justice for Adil Charkaoui will mark the
second anniversary of his "release" on Saturday, February 17. A rally
starting 1 pm that day in Berri Square (in front of Berri Metro) will
demand that the Canadian government immediately close the Kingston
Immigration Holding Centre; immediately release "security certificate"
detainees or provide them with a fair trial; end all proceedings to
deport the five victims of security certificates; abolish security
certificates; and end deportations to torture.
For more information, see http://www.adilinfo.org or call 514-859- 9023.
Greetings to CPC Convention - Editorial
(The
following article is from
the February 1-28,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
People's
Voice Editorial, Feb. 1-28, 2007
As the song goes, "you ain't been
doin' nothin' if you ain't been called a Red." Small in numbers but big
in courage and vision, the Communist Party of Canada holds its 35th
Central Convention at the beginning of February. We salute the CPC on
this occasion, which coincides with the 85th anniversary of the first
open convention of Canadian Communists in February 1922.
The Communist
Party has always played an outstanding role in Canada's political life
for two basic reasons. First is its remarkable record of trailblazing
accomplishments, as the leader of historic campaigns for unemployment
insurance, pensions, organizing rights, women's equality, universal
health care, electoral rights, and many other progressive reforms.
Decades before other political forces, the Communist Party defended the
national rights of the Aboriginal peoples and Québec. In the
darkest days of the Cold War, it was the Communists and a handful of
allies who braved persecution to campaign for peace and disarmament.
Whenever workers in other lands struggled for their freedom, the
Communist Party was in the forefront of those building solidarity.
But even more
fundamentally, the Communist Party stands alone in Canada as a party
based on the revolutionary interests of the working class. Only the CPC
advances a coherent strategy of linking today's struggles with the
creation of a broad alliance to break the domination of big capital,
and the goal of a socialist Canada, in which the productive wealth of
our country will be collectively owned and democratically controlled by
the people.
The working
class of Canada faces huge challenges in the period ahead. Our
struggles will be more powerful and more united with a larger, stronger
Communist Party, so People's Voice wishes every success to the CPC at
its 35th Convention!
Legal rights restricted - Editorial
(The
following article is from
the February 1-28,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
People's
Voice Editorial, Feb. 1-28, 2007
Several recent developments point to a
worrisome trend that would shut the door on the right of most Canadians
to challenge unjust government decisions and policies in court.
One example
was the elimination of the Court Challenges program, which helped to
fund legal cases on language and equality issues, to ensure that our
constitutional rights are upheld in practice, not just on paper. The
argument that closing down this program is necessary to "save money" is
an outright lie. The real aim is to prevent equality-seeking groups
from slowing down the right-wing drive to refashion the Canadian state
by eliminating any progressive role of governments in the sphere of
social policy.
Another case
is the Harper government's decision to appeal the Matlow ruling. Last
fall, an Ontario Superior Court judge upheld a complaint by several
small political parties that the law granting $1.75 per vote annual
grant only to parties which receive over 2% of the total vote is
discriminatory. As the historic legal victory by the Communist Party of
Canada in the Figueroa case made clear, such discrimination by
Parliament against parties on the basis of size is illegal, and this
appeal will undoubtedly fail in higher courts. But the intended effect
is to make such challenges so expensive and time-consuming that
citizens will refrain from taking on governments.
Finally, we
note the sad ending of the court challenge by Little Sisters bookstore
in Vancouver, which has suffered financial hardship for many years
because of arbitrary seizures of imported books by Canada Customs. The
Supreme Court has ruled that the store will not receive the $300,000 in
"advance costs" awarded by lower courts, effectively ending this
important challenge against arbitrary state seizures of printed
materials.
This
disturbing pattern brings to mind the real Golden Rule - you remember:
"Those with the gold make the rules."
New attacks on Canadian Wheat Board
(The
following article is from
the February 1-28,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
(This
article by agrologist Wendy Holm first appeared in Common Ground
magazine, January 2007)
A few days
before Christmas, federal agriculture minister Chuck Strahl fired
highly respected Canadian Wheat Board CEO Adrian Measner, a 32-year
veteran of the organization, and replaced him with a Harper "yes man."
This is but
the latest act in a litany of abuse that began back on July 27, 2006,
when Strahl held a roundtable meeting in Saskatoon on the future of the
Canadian Wheat Board to which only those who agreed with abolishing the
single desk selling authority of the board were invited.
That
afternoon Strahl told journalists his government would not be bound by
Section 47.1 of the Canadian Wheat Board Act, which prohibits any
changes to the marketing of grain in Western Canada unless supported by
a producer vote.
Then there
was the September 19 email from Regina-based Charleton Communications
to Western Canada Wheat Growers and others claiming, "The other side is
embarrassing us with their propaganda" and that "government, MPs and
others" had suggested "we must get into the game with letters to the
editor in weeklies, dailies and agriculture trade publications."
Charleton
Communications offered to write letters from farmers to be sent to
local and regional papers - "at least five letters a week" - "backing
government's position on the CWB ... this would get us into the
propaganda game and save you people time." Who put Charleton up to this?
There was
Strahl's October 5 gag order prohibiting directors and staff of the
Canadian Wheat Board from defending the CWB's role as the single-desk
seller of Western Canadian wheat and barley.
Then there
was Strahl's removal this past fall of two CWB appointed directors (one
fired for supporting the single desk authority of the CWB, one given a
plum post for stepping down), replaced by two anti-CWB directors who
are, in the words of former CWB director Art Macklin, "blatant,
partisan patronage appointments."
Next came
Strahl's October 17 order, in the middle of the CWB election, to remove
36 percent of Western Canada grain growers - 16,269 farmers - from the
list of eligible voters. This year, five directors were elected in a
vote that ran from September 5 to December 1. Electoral districts had
25 to 48 percent of eligible voters cut from their lists; only farmers
that had sold grain through the CWB in the past 15 months were
eligible. This disenfranchised farmers who: had sold domestically
during that period, were victims of flood, drought, or bad harvest
weather, were in the middle of a crop rotation, or still had crops in
the bin. And to make matters worse, Strahl actively campaigned for and
endorsed the anti-CWB directors. What Strahl didn't count on was the
public backlash his actions would evoke.
On October
25, Bill C-300, a private member's bill tabled by Gerry Ritz, chair of
the agriculture committee that would have removed the single desk
authority of the CWB, went down to defeat (149-111) in the House. (To
his great credit, Inky Mark, four-term MP for Dauphin-Swan
River-Marquette, was the sole Conservative to oppose Harper and vote
against Bill C-300.) On November 1, the government also lost (155-121)
an important vote on a motion put forward by the Opposition calling for
a producer vote on any changes to the CWB.
In the recent
board election, farmers solidly supported the CWB, returning pro-CWB
directors in four out of five districts. The only "pro-choice" director
was elected in District 1, where about half of eligible farmers were
stripped of their voting rights by Strahl in mid-election.
Undaunted,
Strahl forges ahead, saying what he can't do with legislation, he will
do with regulation. By stacking the board with political appointments
(government appoints 5 directors, farmers elect 10), Strahl has created
an 8/7 split on the board. By replacing CEO Adrian Measner with another
"yes man" Strahl has created a board at war with itself. Farmers are
outraged. As is this agrologist. What could justify such an assault on
good public policy? When in doubt, follow the money: If farmers lose
power, who gains power? (Hint: eliminating the CWB has topped the US
agricultural wish list since the mid 1980s).
Obviously,
concentrated transnational grain companies will have access to cheaper
grain. In early December, the Saskatchewan Wheat Pool announced its bid
to take over Agricore United. Archer Daniel Midland (ADM) would have
control through options of over 21 percent of the new, merged entity,
making it the largest single shareholder of the new company that would
control 44 percent of the grain elevators in Western Canada and the
lion's share of the grain handling facilities at ports.
Posted on
ADM's website is the Reuters story: Canada Minister Upbeat on
Saskpool-Agricore Deal. In it, Strahl actually praises the merger -
still to be reviewed by the Competition Bureau - as a "good thing"
because it could "create a Canadian grain powerhouse."
Powerhouse indeed. Family farms will
go under, replaced by mega-farms. Canadian grain will go south to
bolster the export quality of inferior US grain and BC's port handling
facilities for grain will all but shut down, and with them, jobs. What
is Strahl thinking?
For companies
like Monsanto, getting rid of the Canadian Wheat Board would eliminate
a strong and vocal farmer advocate that has become a thorn in its side
frustrating expansion plans. CWB's intervention was largely responsible
for preventing Canadian registration of Monsanto's copyrighted and
monopolized transgenic Roundup-ready wheat.
Then there is
always cheap feedstock for ethanol. As large energy companies
reposition themselves to compete in a non-fossil fuel market, rapid
expansion in ethanol production is part of the forecast.
Currently,
there are over 1,000 retail locations selling ethanol-blended gasoline
in Canada. Meeting a Natural Resources Canada-cited target of 35
percent of Canadian gasoline containing 10 percent ethanol by 2010 will
require 1.4 billion litres of ethanol per year from 4.2 million tonnes
of wheat grown on 3.5 million acres of land.
This
represents 18 percent of the tonnage and 14 percent of the land seeded
to wheat in Western Canada in 2006. That production capacity is already
well under way. Under its ethanol expansion program, Natural Resources
Canada just funded $78 million in projects by Suncor, Husky and others
to meet this target, adding 750 million litres of annual fuel ethanol
capacity and quadrupling Canadian production to almost 1 billion
litres. This capacity alone will require 3 million tonnes of feed grain
from 2.5 million acres (13 percent of tonnage and 10 percent of land).
On November
8, ADM announced it plans to dominate the global ethanol market. In any
regulated sector, there are always a few dissidents who get a lot of
print by insisting their freedoms have been curtailed. Supply
management farmers are familiar with this. In the case of grains, the
strategy has been to hang an important name around their neck and to
hit the media running. Makes the public think even farmers are divided.
In fact, with an estimated membership of fewer than 400, the Western
Canada Wheat Growers Association represents less than one percent of
grain farmers. Make no mistake, Strahl's unprecedented and
unacceptable attack on the rights of Western Canadian wheat and barley
growers will destroy the CWB. Without central desk selling, the prairie
farmers of Western Canada will be easy pickings for the highly
concentrated transnational grain corporations.
If government
can wreak this policy abuse upon Canada's grain growers, no commodity
sector is safe. Stand up for Canada's farmers. Tell Chuck Strahl that a
politician that doesn't respect the rights of Canada's farmers does not
have the support of his constituents.
Strahl is the MP for Chilliwack and the Fraser Canyon, 1-800-667-2808;
send emails to:
(Wendy Holm is an award-winning agrologist, economist and journalist. A
popular monthly columnist for the Western Producer, Holm was dismissed
following her participation - at her own expense - in the July 27
pro-Wheat-Board farmer rally in Saskatoon. She attended Chuck Strahl's
6 pm media conference that day as a freelance columnist for the Western
Producer, and asked if he was prepared to move without a grower
plebiscite. The column she filed concerning the event never appeared in
the newspaper. The Western Producer is wholly owned by Glacier
Ventures, a VSE company initially formed to export bottled water.
Glacier Ventures now owns the bulk of Western Canada's farm and
community newspapers. Agricore United's CEO sits on the Glacier board.
Agricore United stands to profit greatly from the demise of the
Canadian Wheat Board. Archer Daniels Midland is Agricore United's major
shareholder.)
A view from Havana: The dissidents' gala
(The
following article is from
the February 1-28,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
By
Manuel E. Yepe, Havana, January 2007
In the first half
of December 2006, several events took place simultaneously in Havana,
which highly impressed a married couple of Latin American friends
visiting Cuba for the first time.
They arrived
in time to witness the military parade and the popular demonstration
for the 50th Anniversary of the Revolutionary Armed Forces, which were
also the culmination of the celebration of Fidel Castro's 80th
birthday, organized by the Guayasamin Foundation, from Ecuador.
They went
back to their country after the 28th New Latin American Film Festival
ended on Dec. 15. Over 100 films were screened in this Festival, and a
large number of cinema stars and filmmakers from Latin America
participated. My friends felt happy to have chosen this time of the
year to learn about the landscape and the soul of this nation, so
vilified for such a long time by the media of their country.
On the
evening of Sunday, December 10, while we were talking about the
activities of the day and about the presence in Cuba of the writer Gore
Vidal with an outstanding group of intellectuals from the United
States, as well as about a delegation of US congressmen from both
parties which alternate power in that nation, they decided to check on
the Internet to see if the press from their country was properly
showing what was causing such a great impression on them.
When they did
so, they burst out in annoyance; on the first page of the main
newspaper of their country was a very striking headline: "Dissidents
Beaten in Cuba on the Day of Human Rights".
The story
from the Spanish news agency EFE reported that "groups linked to the
Cuban government" had blocked a "peaceful march by dissidents in
Havana" marking the International Day of Human Rights. "About a dozen
persons" called by the National Patriotic Front had tried to march
through a park in the Vedado neighbourhood, where about 200 people were
participating in training on National Defense Day. The dissidents, said
EFE, were "insulted and later attacked by revolutionary sympathizers
shouting Long live the Revolution!
and Long Live Fidel".
"How is it
possible that with so many really interesting news features taking
place here, only such an irrelevant thing is published?" my friend
asked.
But his wife
gave a view from another angle: "How is it possible that authorities
here permit a dozen dissidents to bother a large group of citizens
precisely when they are fulfilling the civic duty of training
themselves to defend their threatened homeland?"
I explained
that this type of show is not unusual and that, with no more
information about the incident, it was possible to decode the news in
these terms:
"On the Day
of Human Rights, the US Interests Section, after summoning reporters
and photographers from all the foreign and local media in Havana,
instructed a group of regular `dissidents' to make an antigovernment
demonstration, choosing the same place and timing where a centrally
located neighbourhood would be holding their military training
exercises, as part of preparations to fight a home-by-home battle by
all the population in case of a foreign aggression. As always happens
when such provocations take place, the neighbours themselves were the
ones to answer and the police only intervened in case indignant people
may cause physical damage to the `dissidents', who are always the same
well known persons that have this as their means of subsistence."
The greater
part of the multimillion dollar budget that the US Administration
yearly allocates "for the promotion of democracy in Cuba" stays in
Miami, increasing the wealth of the leaders of the ultra right Cuban
American organizations. But a small part of it gets through to the
groups mobilized by the US Interests Section in Havana, in fact, the
sole leader of the Cuban opposition.
Governmental
organizations such as USAID, and NGOs such as the National Endowment
for Democracy (NED), which are actually CIA covert organizations, as
well as other subversion, intelligence and counterintelligence
agencies, are being used to channel these funds in different ways.
In Cuba, as
in any other democratic country, all citizens have the right to
disagree with government policies and decisions, based on the principle
that the government responds to the will of the majority of the
citizens, and not necessarily to all the citizens.
Dissidents
can use multiple means to express their disagreement in a peaceful way
and in the framework established by law. The Cuban socio-political
system, stemming from its participatory character, offers a large
number of spaces and ways to convey suggestions and differences. These
scenarios could be wider, but the hostile policies practised towards
Cuba by different US administrations limit them.
As all
national legislations establish, Cuban laws require that actions
opposing the national establishment must be absolutely independent from
any alien government, as an elemental requisite of respect for national
sovereignty, legal equity among states and non-intervention in national
matters.
In all
countries, without exception, the attitude towards national citizens
registered as agents of alien governments is completely different,
because they do not have the rights that the dissidents have. National
legislations restrict the spaces of the former, limiting their
movements - they cannot go where they want or talk to whoever they
decide.
In cases
where there is open hostility between the national government and the
one whom the agents serve, they are put on permanent vigilance by the
authorities to guarantee that they abide to the strict space to which
their movements have been limited. There is also a call to the
population to collaborate in this vigilance, as a form of expressing
patriotism.
Therefore, in
order to understand the situation of the so called "Cuban dissidents"
portrayed by the foreign media, mainly the ones controlled or
influenced by the campaigns orchestrated by the US against the
Revolution during the last fifty years, it is necessary to determine
their true identity.
Are they
really dissidents or are they agents of an alien and hostile country?
If they were
actually honest citizens with points of view differing from the
official ones, wanting to express their views and to contribute to
rectifying some governmental policies or directives; if they were
persons willing to peacefully meet with other citizens who also
disagree with the course taken by the nation in order to solve the
difficulties that the society is suffering; if they have no links of
dependence with a foreign government; if they are not moved by material
stimulus or promises to be accepted in other countries in response to
their opposition activities, or if they were not instructed by alien
sources, then they could be considered "dissidents". In that case, they
would be respected as such category deserves, in spite of the fact that
US policy towards Cuba has disparaged this term to an extent that is
has been assimilated as "mercenary" in the feelings of Cubans.
These "Cuban
dissidents" are really nothing but agents of a clearly hostile
government that has been fighting an undeclared war against the
government of this nation and its citizens for more that 48 years. They
have never been prosecuted for expressing ideas or thinking
differently. In fact, the treatment they are granted is evidence of the
very high grade of humanitarianism of the Cuban revolutionary project.
It is not
just any foreign government that these agents serve, but a superpower
that has publicly declared its intention to overthrow the Cuban
government, has made attempts against the life of its leaders, and
presently has official plans to promote and finance the dismounting of
the social order that Cubans have given themselves with great
sacrifices. They serve a government that has no respect whatsoever for
international law and considers itself above the United Nations, for
whose decisions it has no respect.
In practice,
the dissidents' farce - the alleged opposition party leaders,
independent journalists, independent librarians, and self-proclaimed
human rights watchers - have absolutely no representativeness or
support in any place except in Miami.
When they
exceed the limits of tolerance and engage in serious crimes, and are
therefore sentenced to prison following every criminal and procedural
warranty established by Cuban laws, the media serving the US campaign
against Cuba calls them "prisoners of conscience".
Ultimately,
the individuals identified as "dissidents" by the media that constantly
denigrates the Cuban revolution do not constitute a new category in
Cuban history, because this country has suffered opportunist
annexationism as an endemic evil since its first wars for independence.
Those now existing are unprincipled persons that serve the enemies of
their motherland and objectively obstruct the development of Cuban
socialist democracy, constantly moving towards its improvement from
1959 until today.
(Manuel Yepe is a lawyer, economist
and social scientist. He is an Associate Professor at the Raul Roa
Higher Institute of International Relations in Havana, and Secretary of
the Cuban Peace Movement)
February 7 - protest to get Canada out of Haiti!
(The
following article is from
the February 1-28,
2007
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 173 West Ave. North, Hamilton,
ON, L8L 5C7.)
By
Darrell Rankin
On December 22, 2006, some 400 UN
troops conducted a day-long raid in communities considered strongholds
of Lavalas, the party of ousted President Jean-Bertrand Aristide,
killing about 30 people. In response, Fondasyon Trant Septanm, an
11-year old organization of victims of the 1991 and 2004 coups d'etat
in Haiti, has issued a call for protests in cities around the world on
February 7.
The call is
supported by the Confederation of Haitian workers and groups
representing political prisoner supporters, human rights activists and
many other grass roots causes.
The
Canada-Haiti Action Network is holding protests across Canada on
Wednesday, February 7 in solidarity with the call.
Haitians are
condemning the recent murderous assault on the poor by United Nations
occupying forces (MINUSTAH). Several raids have targeted leaders and
supporters of the Lavalas grassroots democracy movement.
Haiti was occupied by
troops from Canada, the U.S. and France in 2004. These imperialist
countries carried out a huge war crime, overthrowing the
democratically-elected and popular government of Aristide and the
ruling Lavalas party.
The United
Nations Security Council has since sent troops from other countries to
take over the occupation, which have been responsible for the deaths of
many Haitians, massive raids into poor neighbourhoods, and the training
of new police forces which themselves have murdered and imprisoned
hundreds of people.
The Royal
Canadian Mounted Police is also helping to train the police forces,
Some police were members of Haiti's death squad-ridden army which
propped up dictatorships before Aristide's first election in 1991.
The Communist
Party of Canada was the first political party in this country to
condemn the occupation of Haiti in 2004, calling for the immediate
withdrawal of all foreign troops from Haiti. CPC members will be sure
to help where they can to build the largest protests possible on
February 7. Protest details can be obtained by contacting local CHAN
groups or by visiting Canada-Haiti Action at http://canadahaitiaction.ca/.
What's Left