October 1-15, 2009
Volume 17 - Number 16
$1

Prolétaires de tous les pays, unissez-vous!
Otatoskewak ota kitaskinahk mamawestotan!
Workers of all lands, unite

Contents
Printer-friendly articles

1) UNEMPLOYED TO HIT 57 MILLION: OECD
2) ECONOMIC RECOVERY? FOR WHOM?
3) COMMUNIST PARTY SLAMS EI "REFORMS"
4) UNIONS, MICHAEL MOORE BACK SUDBURY STRIKERS
5) SUPPORT STRIKING SUDBURY STEELWORKERS!
6) LEGAL OBSERVERS TO MONITOR 2010 OLYMPICS
7) SMELL OF DEFEAT IN AFGHANISTAN - Editorial
8) KENNEY IMPOSING FAR-RIGHT AGENDA - Editorial
9) CLEAN UP THE TORY/CORPORATE SLUDGE
10) WILDROSE VICTORY A WAKE-UP CALL FOR ALBERTA
11) Bill 177 - BACK TO HARRIS TORY POLICIES
12) H1N1, PUBLIC HEALTH AND RACISM INTERTWINED
13) PROSECUTORS RELUCTANT TO TREAT GAY-BASHINGS AS HATE CRIMES
14) A TASTE, BUT NOT A COMPLETE MEAL
15) "ALMEIDA LIVES TODAY MORE THAN EVER"
16) YOUTH UNION CONFERENCE PLANNED IN PERU

17) WHAT'S LEFT
18) PODCAST OF PEOPLE'S VOICE ARTICLES
19) CLARTÉ (en français)
20) PV CROSSWORD

21)
THE SPARK! (Theoretical and Discussion Bulletin of the Communist Party of Canada)
22)
INTRODUCING MARX
23
)
REBEL YOUTH


PEOPLE'S VOICE OCTOBER 1-16 (pdf)


WOMEN'S SOCIALIST CALENDAR 2010 (pdf)



The Spark!

Theoretical and Discussion Bulletin of the Communist Party of Canada

The Spark!

The latest issue of The Spark! theoretical journal, is now on sale for $5 at Communist Party offices (see p. 8) or People’s Co-op Books, 1391 Commercial Drive, Vancouver.

Articles include
  • “Introduction to a General Theory of Culture” (Barry Lord);
  • “Political & Economic Realities Behind Colombian Labour Relations” (Sacouman, Moore & Brittain); 
  • “Treaty Process & Indian Nationalism” (Ray Bobb);
  • “Lenin: Heritage of the Socialist Market Economy” (C.J. Atkins);
  • “Nature of the State Under Bush & Harper” (Stephen Von Sychowski);
  • plus reviews, editorials, and more.


People's Voice deadlines:
OCTOBER 16-31
Thursday, October 8
NOVEMBER 1-16
Thursday, October 22
Send submissions to PV Editorial Office,
706 Clark Drive, Vancouver, V5L 3J1,
pvoice@telus.net






People's Voice finds many "Global Class Struggle" reports at the "Labour Start" website, http://www.labourstart.org. We urge our readers to check it out!


*  *  *  *  *
People's Voice

Canadian Publications Mail Sales Product Agreement #205214
ISSN number 1198-8657
People's Voice is published by
New Labour Press Ltd
  PV Editorial Office
706 Clark Drive,
VANCOUVER, B.C. V5L 3J1
Phone:604-255-2041
Fax:604-254-9803
email:  pvoice@telus.net

Editor: Kimball Cariou
Editorial Board: Kimball Cariou, Miguel Figueroa,
Doug Meggison, Naomi Rankin, Liz Rowley, Jim Sacouman

* * * * * *
Letters
People's Voice welcomes your letters
on any subject covered in our pages.
We reserve the right to edit for length and clarity,
and to refuse to print letters which may be libellous
or which contain unnecessary personal attacks.
Send your views to:
"Letters to the Editor",
796 Clark Dr., Vancouver, BC V5L 3J1,
or pvoice@telus.net
People's Voice articles may be reprinted without permission,
provided the source is credited.

* * * * * *

The Communist Party of Canada, formed in 1921,
has a proud history of fighting for jobs, equality, peace,
Canadian independence, and socialism.
The CPC does much more than run candidates in elections.
We think the fight against big business and its parties
is a year-round job,
so our members are active across the country,
to build our party and to help strengthen people's movements
on a wide range of issues.

All our policies and leadership
are set democratically by our members.
To find out more about Canada's party of Socialism,
give us a call at the nearest CPC office.

* * * * * *
Central Committee CPC
290A Danforth Ave Toronto, Ont. M4K 1N6
Ph: (416) 469-2446
fax: (416) 469-4063 E-mail info@cpc-pcc.ca

Parti Communiste du Quebec (section du
Parti communiste du Canada)
5430, av. Trans-Island, Montréal, QC,
H3W 3A5
Tel: (514)737-7817 Cel: (514)212-3857
E-mail: pueblo@sympatico.ca

B.C.Committee CPC

706 Clark Drive, Vancouver, V5L 3J1
Tel: (604) 254-9836
Fax: (604) 254-9803

Edmonton CPC
Box 68112, 70 Bonnie Doon P.O.
Edmonton, AB, T6C 4N6
Tel: (780) 465-7893
Fax: (780)463-0209

Calgary CPC
Unit #1 - 19 Radcliffe Close SE
Calgary  AB, T2A 6B2
Tel: (403) 248-6489

Saskatchewan CPC
mail@communist-party-sk.ca

Ottawa CPC
Tel: (613) 232-7108

Manitoba Committee
387 Selkirk Ave., Winnipeg, R2W 2M3
Tel/fax: (204) 586-7824

Ontario Ctee. CPC
290A Danforth Ave., Toronto, M4K 1N6
Tel: (416) 469-2446

Hamilton Ctee. CPC
265 Melvin Ave., Apt. 815
Hamilton, ON.
Tel: (905) 548-9586

Atlantic Region CPC
Box 70 Grand Pré, NS, B0P 1M0
Tel/fax: (902) 542-7981

http://www.communist-party.ca/

* * * * * *

News for People, Not for Profits!
Every issue of People's Voice
gives you the latest
on the fightback from coast to coast.
Whether it's the struggle for jobs or peace, resistance to social cuts,
solidarity with Cuba, or workers' struggles around the world,
we've got the news the corporate media won't print.
And we do more than that
- we report and analyze events
from a revolutionary perspective,
helping to build the movements for justice and equality,
and eventually for a socialist Canada.

Read the paper that fights for working people
- on every page, in every issue!

People's Voice
$30 for 1 year
$50 for 2 years
Low-income special rate: $15 for 1-year
Outside Canada $50 for 1 year
Send to: People's Voice, 133 Herkimer St.., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3

REDS ON THE WEB
http://www.communist-party.ca
http://www.ycl-ljc.ca
http://www.solidnet.org

(Contents)
(Home)


1) UNEMPLOYED TO HIT 57 MILLION: OECD

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

Special to PV

The Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development has warned that unemployment in the thirty largest capitalist states will continue to rise into next year. The OECD's Employment Outlook 2009 says "There are growing signs that the worst may be over and that a recovery may be in sight. But the short-term employment outlook is grim."

     Elsewhere in this issue, Sam Hammond presents a Marxist perspective on mass unemployment and its implications for the capitalist state and the working class. But the data in this OECD report is worth examining in detail, since it illustrates that recovery for the bosses does not mean recovery for workers.

     The official overall jobless rate in OECD member countries has hit a postwar record of 8.5%, thanks to 15 million layoffs since the end of 2007. Overall unemployment in the OECD countries may surpass 10 per cent, which would mean 57 million out of work.

     "Employment is the bottom line of the current crisis," OECD secretary general Angel Gurria said. "It is essential that governments focus on helping jobseekers in the months to come." Of course, the OECD's policy recommendations have two purposes: heading off an explosion of working class anger, and ensuring that employers have a sufficient pool of trained workers to exploit.

     The OECD suggests that output growth will resume in the first half of 2010 and will be mild until late in the year. It admits that job creation will lag significantly behind any pickup in output.

     Unemployment in Canada is forecast to continue to rise to almost 10% next year, from the current 8.7%. Since employment peaked in October 2008, more than 486,000 full-time jobs have disappeared, many in the manufacturing sector. The report warns that job losses in Canada could be worse than during the recession of the early 1990s, the decade of the "jobless recovery." While the unemployment rate peaked in early 1993, it took another eight years to fall below its pre-recession level.

     Unemployment was quicker to rise in the United States than in many OECD countries due to the collapse of the housing bubble. Since December 2007, payroll employment has dropped by 6.9 million in the US and the unemployment rate increased by 4.8% to a 25-year high of 9.7%. The OECD expects the US unemployment rate to remain over 10% through 2010.

     Youth, low-skilled and racialized communities have borne the brunt of the crisis in the US. For teenagers, jobless rates jumped 8.6% to an all-time high of 25.5%. Other groups seeing sharp rises include young adults (up 5.9%), high-school dropouts (up 8.1%), Blacks (up 6.2%) and Hispanics (up 6.8%). One in three unemployed persons in the US had been jobless more than six months by August 2009, the highest since records began in 1948.

     The recession is also exacerbating "in-work" poverty. Even before the crisis, 12% of Americans living in a household containing one or more workers had a disposable income of less than 50% of the median, considered as relatively poor. The recession is also reducing the paychecks of workers who face cuts in hours and wages. While the number of unemployed persons in the US had risen to 14.7 million by June 2009, 9 million additional workers were limited to part-time hours even though they would have preferred to work full-time.

     Japan has experienced sizeable job losses. In July, the unemployment rate hit a record level of 5.7%, two percent higher than at the end of 2007, as 1.3 million workers joined the ranks of the jobless. The manufacturing and construction sectors have been most seriously affected.

     Youth participation in the labour force fell by 350,000 in the two years to July 2009. Since the "lost decade" of the 1990s, Japanese youth have faced great difficulties in the labour market. The unemployment rate for 15-24 year olds rose by 2.4% over the past 12 months, reaching 9.9% in July 2009. This mirrors the situation across the OECD countries, as young people face jobless rates twice as high as adults.

     Japan has seen a steady increase in "non-regular" (part-time, temporary, daily and contract) workers, from 16% of the total workforce in 1985 to over one-third by 2008. Such precarious workers are highly vulnerable to job loss; the employment of temporary and daily employees fell by 3.6% in the 12 months to July 2009, compared to a fall of 1.1% for regular employees. Many non-regular workers in Japan are not covered by employment insurance, but steps have been taken to extend their eligibility for short-time work subsidies.

     Even before the downturn, the working poor made up more than 80% of the poor in Japan, compared with 63% on average for OECD countries. Around 11% of individuals living in households with at least one person working are poor in Japan, the fifth highest level in the OECD after Turkey, Mexico, Poland and the United States.

     The UK unemployment rate, which reached 7.8% in the second quarter of 2009, and a post-war peak of 8.5% by July, is expected to approach 10% in the coming months.

     As in other countries, British youth have been particularly affected. While the overall unemployment rate in Britain rose by 2.4% during the past year, the increase was 5.8% for 16-17 year olds and 4.7% for those 18 to 24.

     The OECD expects Ireland to be one of the slowest-recovering economies, and warns that unemployment rates could hit 15% by the end of 2010. The collapse of the housing price bubble, compounded by the global financial crisis and economic slowdown, caused sharp job losses. From December 2007 to July 2009, 166,000 Irish workers lost their jobs, and the unemployment rate rose by 4.7% to 12.5%, the second-highest level in the OECD after Spain, shattering Ireland's "Celtic Tiger" myth.

     Unemployment among temporary and part-time workers in Ireland have increased more than twice as fast as that of the total workforce. Migrant unemployment surged in the early months of the crisis, then slowed as many migrants returned to their countries of origin. Youth unemployment did not rise much faster than total unemployment, but the OECD notes that "this largely reflects the fact that many younger job losers have left the labour market." By July 2009, over one-quarter of workers under 25 found themselves unemployed.

     Unemployment is expected to continue rising well into 2010 in France, and could approach 11% by the end of 2010 if the recovery falters. Since the end of 2007, the French unemployment rate has risen by 2% to reach 9.8% in July 2009. More than 600,000 workers have lost their jobs.

     Even before the current crisis, the youth unemployment rate in France was significantly above the OECD average. Now almost one in four French youth are jobless.

     The OECD notes that "extensive use of short-time work schemes in France help workers weather the storm. These schemes are a valuable tool to prevent unnecessary layoffs due to temporary reductions in product demand or access to credit. However, in long and deep recessions they are likely to be less effective in preserving jobs and more likely to become an obstacle to recovery, by putting a brake on the reallocation of workers from declining to expanding firms. To avoid protecting the `wrong' jobs and harming employment growth during a subsequent recovery, it would be important to attach clear and credible time limits to these measures." In other words, the main goal of the capitalist state's employment policies must be to maximise corporate profits.

     At the outset of the jobs crisis, the poverty rate among the working-age population was 6.7% in France, or 2.3% lower than the OECD average. The French social safety net reduces by two-thirds the poverty risk among the whole working-age population, and by more than three-quarters the poverty rate for jobless households.

     However, the OECD urges action to prevent "long lasting benefit dependency for a significant proportion of the recipient population." The report praises Sarkozy's "reform of the public employment service (which) should strengthen the links between benefit recipiency, job search and participation in employment programmes..."

     Spain has experienced the sharpest increase in unemployment in OECD countries. Since December 2007, payroll employment in Spain has dropped by almost 2.3 million and the unemployment rate increased by 9.7% to reach 18.5% in July. The rate is expected to approach 20% in 2010, which "implies that the largest part of the total expected increase in unemployment in Spain has already taken place, while in other European countries a significant further increase in unemployment is expected going forward."

     The job losses in Spain "would be significantly larger if vigorous macroeconomic measures had not taken place." State investment in municipalities has contributed to the creation of nearly 400,000 jobs (the majority of these are temporary), and has helped preserve many existing jobs.

     Employment in Spain's construction sector has dropped by 25%. The unemployment rate of immigrants was 28% in the second quarter of 2009, more than 50% higher than the already very high overall unemployment rate of 18%. Temporary employment accounted for close to 90% of all job losses in the 12 months to June 2009. As in other OECD countries, Spanish youth have been battered by the downturn, with one-third of youth out of work at present.

     By June 2009, over one million jobless had been out of work for more than one year, representing a quarter of overall unemployment. Long-term unemployment has the worst impact on those over 45 year old and other relatively disadvantaged workforce groups, who are "pushed to the back of the hiring queue".

     Unemployment is a key driver of poverty in Spain. Prior to the recession, close to 50% of jobless households in Spain were relatively poor, compared with 37% on average across the OECD. This is "particularly worrisome given the large numbers of unemployed persons coupled with a sharp increase of jobless households not receiving income support (over 1 million)." The Spanish government recently granted a short-duration benefit for long-term unemployed workers who have exhausted their benefits.

     Korea's unemployment rate may have peaked in June at 4.0%, since the July rate was slightly lower at 3.8%. The June rate represented a 1 percent increase from its most recent trough in September 2008, but was still only one-half the OECD average. As in many other OECD countries, construction and manufacturing have been the hardest hit sectors in Korea.

     Korea adopted the largest fiscal stimulus package in the OECD area, at 6.1% of 2008 GDP, a move which is "playing an important role in limiting employment losses" by an estimated 150,000 to 326,000.

     On the other hand, wage restraint has been harsher in Korea than other countries. The "grand social compact" which was agreed to last February set guidelines for employment retention in exchange for wage concessions. In the public sector and larger enterprises, 422 concessionary agreements had been signed by the end of March 2009. No figures are provided for the income losses suffered by workers as a result of these concessions.

     The unemployment rate for Korea's 15-29 year olds not in full-time education increased from 7.4% to 8.5% over the 12 months prior to July 2009.






2) ECONOMIC RECOVERY? FOR WHOM?

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

By Sam Hammond

It used to be in earlier society that a cobbler made shoes. After the rise of capitalism with its class exploitation, relations of production and market competition, the manufacture of shoes occupies thousands of people.

     This is because capital, in its drive to cheapen production costs and dominate markets, accelerates a division of labour into smaller and smaller units, each with lesser but more specialized skills. In turn, this accelerates the competition of labour, the competition between workers, especially in an environment where there are large pools of surplus labour (the unemployed) banging at the doors of workplaces and offering cheaper rates than those already inside. It is precisely this phenomenon that drives capital to cheapen labour and create unemployment.

     Capitalism, as it develops through its stages, seeks to turn everything into a commodity that can be sold in the marketplace. Thus the market economy. In capitalism, labour power is purchased and traded like any other commodity. Thus the "labour market" - the odious expression for that part of our lives we hand over to gain wages to sustain that other part of our lives.

     Karl Marx pointed out that a commodity will always find a price above or below its cost of production, creating profit or loss for the capitalist. If labour power is sold above the cost of its production (the rearing and maintenance of children, education, housing, etc.) workers will live and by proportion purchase small pleasures. If the price of labour power falls below the cost of its production, workers starve, and the horrible spectacle of deprivation, famine and disease are the results.

     Historically, it was the social and political intervention in this phenomenon by the working class that created the labour movement. Workers banded together to gain economic benefit, developing institutions with social-political and ideological goals. The two dominant and competing ideological strains, developed within and imported from without, have been reformism and revolution. Each at different times and places has been dominant, but both are always present in the class struggle. So there is a choice: which do we need at the present time? More on this later.

     The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), originating in 1947 to manage the post-war Marshall Plan and make sure Europe was rebuilt along capitalist lines, was an economic parallel with NATO and an instrument in the competition between the capitalist and socialist bloc countries. The original 20 member states have now expanded to 30 and reach into the southern hemisphere (Australia, New Zealand) and Asia (Turkey). All the member states are committed to the so-called free market economy (don't forget the labour market), the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

     Ironically, the OECD is a great research source for anyone studying economic trends and development; see our page 7 article on the OECD's Employment Outlook 2009, for example. Even more ironically, like most neo-liberal imperialist think tanks, the OECD extols the market economy while also recently preaching necessary regulation and stimulus injection. It points out the dangers of escalating permanent global unemployment that will inevitably produce social resistance ending in....? They won't say the phrase: revolutionary movements. Reformism doesn't directly challenge capital, so it is only dangerous as a spawning ground for revolutionary thought, a rejection of itself.

     Like most imperialist word-speaks, the OECD is desperately seeking signs of recovery. If one automobile is sold or one nickel of profit is turned, this is enough to signal a glorious recovery. At the same time, parallel and concurrent, is the prediction of long term permanent unemployment. For Canada, they predict official jobless rates of 10% or more well into 2010 or even 2011.

     So at the same time, we have the phenomena of escalating unemployment (read poverty, smashed families, homelessness, cheap desperate labour and general impoverishment) and recovery (read resumed profit, exploitation, wealthy industrialists and bankers).

     Which one is correct? Both are, because capitalism is a class society, and the interests of one class are opposed to the interests of the other. The present crisis is the product of capitalism, and also the propellant towards the next more acute crisis, with an exponential increase in human suffering, war and plunder and destruction of environment. Without intervention, the future will be more of the present.

     But if capital is market driven, and the market demands consumers, how can there be a recovery with unemployment and cheap labour shrinking the market, increasing the inability of the masses of people to purchase?

     This is the fly in the ointment that makes capitalism a social system that has outlived its historical usefulness. It has reached a stage of imperialism, where stagnation is a permanent phenomenon, and economic stimulation can only be regional and procured by the cheapening of labour, the capturing of resources and markets through war.

     Some members of the working class think they can survive and prosper as junior partners, an "aristocracy of labour" amongst their own class, living in a sea of cheaper labour, under-employed or unemployed. This can only be transient and temporary, because their acquiescence only helps escalate the objective nature of capital to impoverish labour in general and drive its commodity price down.

     In 1847, Karl Marx wrote in Wage-Labour and Capital about the escalating division of labour and the effect of capitalist market competition: "We have hastily sketched in broad outlines the industrial war of capitalists among themselves. This war has the peculiarity that the battles in it are won less by recruiting than by discharging the army of workers. The generals (the capitalists) vie with one another as to who can discharge the greatest number of industrial soldiers."

     Downsizing, technology, speed-up, increasing workload, deteriorating work conditions, increased production and cheaper prices with a smaller work force. Is this not Canadian manufacturing, especially auto?

     Both the reformist and revolutionary trends in labour have historically grappled with the competition between workers. That is where the word union labour comes from, as opposed to individual labour. That is where collective bargaining seeks to destroy individual contracts. Reformism can be useful in the short term, but soon finds itself shaped and channelled by the "carrot and stick" tactics of capital into counterposing the interests of "members" to those of the class as a whole.

     This is not always done intentionally, indeed it is resisted, but is always a pressure from more powerful capital. To move beyond this danger requires a larger outlook, a higher consciousness that embraces and recruits the entire class towards some kind of social solution. That is revolutionary ideology, an ideology that addresses itself to the problem of eradicating the cause as a propellant towards a solution.

     As a class, what do we need to resist and maintain ourselves? Competition or co-operation? Cannibalism, raiding and exclusion, or unity and inclusion" That is the question that begs for a debate. What do you think?

     (Contact Sam Hammond at newlabourpress@telus.net.)






3) COMMUNIST PARTY SLAMS EI "REFORMS"

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

The proposed changes to the Employment Insurance (EI) system announced Sept. 14 by Federal Human Resources Minister Diane Finley have been called an "insult" to both working and unemployed Canadians by Communist Party leader Miguel Figueroa.

     "It would be far too charitable to call this meagre gesture `lame'," says Figueroa. "In fact, this temporary fix will help barely 10% of the officially unemployed, and does absolutely nothing to reform the broken EI system that already excludes coverage for over half those currently out of work."

     For those who have paid at least 30% of their maximum annual premium in seven of the last 10 years, the changes will mean a maximum five additional weeks of coverage. To get the full additional 20 weeks, a worker has to have paid in for 12 to 15 years. The measures are temporary and will apply to new claims filed since January 2009 (if the Bill is passed by Oct. 15), and will not apply to new claims filed after Sept. 11, 2010. There are additional clauses that significantly cut benefits for new claims filed after June 6, 2010.

     "At a time when millions of workers are being victimized by the impact of a devastating crisis brought on by the speculative greed of finance capitalists, and when billions upon billions of public funds are ladled out to banks and corporations to rescue their sliding profit margins, this feeble pittance is a sop, and a monumental insult to working people," says Figueroa.

     "One of the most insidious aspects to these changes is that workers who are most vulnerable to temporary and long-term layoffs - those who have claimed 35 weeks or more in EI over the last five years - and whose living conditions are therefore the most precarious, will be completely excluded from additional coverage. This reflects an underlying mentality that those workers who had previously suffered bouts of unemployment have only themselves to blame."

     "Finley's `anti-reform' Bill C-50 demonstrates once again the vicious anti-working class character of the Harper Conservatives, and underlines the urgency of driving the Tories out of office at the earliest opportunity," Figueroa added.

     The Communist Party leader also criticized the position taken by the federal NDP to support the proposal, dubbing it "a step in the right direction".

     "Mr. Layton and his NDP caucus say that they cannot `in good conscience' vote against this pitiful measure. Everyone knows the truth however; the NDP strategists are afraid that bringing down this hated government might result in losing some NDP seats in a resulting election. It was that partisan and mistaken calculation, not `good conscience', which paved the way to this shameless and opportunist retreat."

     "Passivity and poll-gazing will not defeat the Conservatives. What is needed is the development of a fighting alternative to the Tory/corporate agenda - a people's alternative that creates real meaningful jobs for working people, that defends Canadian sovereignty, that reverses the gutting of public services like health and education, and gets Canada out of the war and occupation in Afghanistan now. That people's program is needed to rally and galvanize the working class and its allies to victory," says Figueroa.

     "A real jobs program is the key, one which reverses the sellout of the Canadian economy to foreign capital and reverses the slide into de-industrialization. With respect to the EI system itself, the Communist Party has called for meaningful and significant changes which would extend coverage for the entire period of unemployment at 90% of former earnings, and remove the current two-week waiting period."






4) UNIONS, MICHAEL MOORE BACK SUDBURY STRIKERS

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

Supporters from global labour movement were joined by filmmaker Michael Moore in Sudbury on Sept. 19 in a major show of solidarity with about 4,000 Vale Inco strikers.

     Vale Inco is 100% owned by the Brazilian transnational Vale SA, the second largest mining company on the planet, which took over Inco three years ago. The company is trying force inferior pension plans and seniority agreements on United Steelworkers members who have been on strike since July in Sudbury and Port Colborne, Ontario, and at Voisey's Bay in Newfoundland and Labrador.

     The guests in Sudbury included representatives from the International Trade Union Confederation, ICEM (International Federation of Chemical, Energy, Mine and General Workers' Unions), International Metalworkers' Federation, and leaders of the AFL-CIO, Unite from the UK, CUT and Sindimina from Brazil, and the National Union of Mineworkers from Mexico. Together, they represent over 168 million workers.

     "Vale Inco is massively profitable, currently has huge cash assets, and increased its executive compensation by 121% in the last two years," according to John Fera, President of USW Local 6500.

     Academy Award winning filmmaker Michael Moore also showed his support for the strikers and the community by holding a special Sudbury screening of his new film, Capitalism: A Love Story, to be released in theatres on October 2. At the world premier of the film on Sept. 13 in Toronto, Moore walked the red carpet with four striking miners and the National Director of the United Steelworkers.

     Facts and figures about Vale Inco reveal a story of incredible greed. The company has $22 billion US worth of cash assets as of last March 31. It reported $13.2 billion US in after-tax profits for 2008. Vale Inco has made twice as much profit in 2 years, as Inco made in past 10 years. Vale Inco collected $4.1 billion US profit from its operations in Ontario during 2006-2008, compared to Inco's tally of $2.2 billion US in Ontario profits over 1996-2006.

     Six of Vale Inco's executive officers were paid $33 million US in 2008, while the average wage for Vale Inco workers is $29 per hour. The workers formerly earned an hourly bonus averaging $4.86, which has been eliminated. Labour accounts for less than one-tenth of Vale Inco's costs.

     Vale SA allows its Brazilian workers no seniority rights, no access to union representation, and no grievance procedures. Hired mainly on a contract basis, the workers can be terminated at any moment without cause. Health and safety standards are low, and a majority of the workers are terminated for one reason or another after just three to five years.






5) SUPPORT STRIKING SUDBURY STEELWORKERS!

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

The Ontario Committee of the Communist Party of Canada, meeting in Toronto on Sept. 20, condemned the Vale corporation for its hostility to Canadian workers and labour laws, and the threat it poses to the Sudbury community with its decision to use scabs in a provocative and dangerous effort to break the strike.

     "We call on the Federal government to nationalize the Canadian operations of this multinational corporation without further delay, repealing the 2006 agreement which allowed Vale to purchase the Canadian owned Inco," said the Ontario Committee.

     "Vale's purchase of the mines and operations in Sudbury, Port Colborne and Voisey's Bay should not have been permitted in the first place, as the Sudbury mines are now wholly owned by foreign interests, at the expense of Canada's sovereignty.

     "Vale is a vicious multinational employer bent on cutting the wages, pensions, benefits and working conditions of workers employed in one of the most dangerous occupations in the world.   Their aim is to inflate bloated profits, and use the current downturn in nickel prices to undermine free collective bargaining and slash the living standards and quality of life of Inco workers.       "Vale is demonstrating its sheer greed, and is in complete contravention of the rights of workers in Canada, and the public interest.

     "Federal and provincial governments must take immediate action to protect workers, instead of protecting the companies that are exploiting them, and the resources that properly belong to all the people of Canada.

     "The Communist Party stands in full support of the members of Local 6500 USWA in their just struggle to defend their livelihoods, their families, and their community. An injury to one is an injury to all!"






6) LEGAL OBSERVERS TO MONITOR 2010 OLYMPICS

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

PV Vancouver Bureau

     The 2010 Winter Olympics come to Vancouver and Whistler in just over four months, but the uncertainties over civil liberties during this event are growing.

     VANOC, the organizing committee for the games, claims that people will be free to express their views during the Olympics. But the release of documents obtained through Freedom of Information requests paints a very different picture.

     The Olympic Charter, for example, states that "no kind of demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda is permitted in any Olympic sites, venues or other sports grounds."

     Some would argue that this clause is intended to prevent disruption of competitions, although the Charter goes further by banning any "publicity or propaganda" worn or used by the athletes themselves - with the exception of commercial advertising.

     This ban is clearly intended to prevent any repeat of Mexico City in 1968, when U.S. athlete Tommie Smith won the 200 meter race, followed by Australia's Peter Norman and John Carlos of the U.S. On the medal podium, the two U.S. athletes received their medals shoeless, but wearing black socks, to represent black poverty. Smith wore a black scarf to represent black pride. Carlos had his tracksuit top unzipped to show solidarity with all blue collar workers in the U.S., and wore beads in memory of lynching victims. Norman supported their action, and all three wore Olympic Project for Human Rights badges.

     But the restrictions imposed on Vancouver are far more sweeping, such as the "Host City Contract" signed in 2003 by then-mayor Larry Campbell. This contract commits the city and Olympic organizing bodies to "ensure that no propaganda or advertising is placed within the Olympic venues or outside the Olympic venues in such a manner as to be within the view of the television cameras covering the sports at the Games or of the spectators watching the sports at the Games."

     This clause empowers the 16,000-plus security forces at the Games to stop any unauthorized distribution of leaflets or newspapers, or displays of banners or signs, anywhere near Olympic venues. Since key venues are in the heart of downtown Vancouver, large areas of the city could become "no free speech" zones.

     In fact, the International Olympic Committee document titled "Brand Protection: Olympic Marketing Ambush Prevention and Clean Venue Guidelines," specifically orders "12 to 20 (surveillance) teams covering all venues and the city at any one time, with two shifts of teams per day in venues or areas that require extra attention."

     And it gets worse, since many streets will be designated as "Olympic corridors" for weeks before, during and after the Feb. 12-28 Games. This includes Hastings Street, which runs through the poverty-stricken Downtown Eastside and other areas known for opposition to the $6 billion spending spree to host the 2010 Games. The Centre for Socialist Education which houses People's Voice and the Communist Party offices can easily be seen from Hastings; will this building be compelled to remove any window posters critical of the Olympics? Will residents of homes and apartments along these corridors face similar restrictions?

     One frequent reply to such questions is that these rules are only to prevent "ambush marketing" - a term for businesses which seek to advertise during the Olympics without having paid the IOC for this privilege.

     At this point, nobody at VANOC or City Hall is willing to explain exactly how these restrictions will work. The cloak of secrecy is justified in part by the need to prevent "terrorists" from learning security plans. But in recent days, the Vancouver Integrated Security Unit (VISU), which is overseeing security operations, has again stepped up its harassment of critics of the Games.

     In this situation, the Pivot Legal Society and the BC Civil Liberties Association are training legal observers to monitor the Games. Participants will be trained to observe and record important information on infringements of the rights to free speech and assembly, unreasonable searches and seizures, etc. The legal observers may be called upon as witnesses in resulting court cases.

     The groups have also sent letters to VISU asking for commitments that agents provocateurs will not infiltrate anti-Olympic movements, as happened during the August 2007 North American leaders summit in Montebello, Quebec.

     Upcoming legal observer training sessions will take place on Oct. 11, Nov. 22 and Dec. 6, all at 2:30 pm, at the Britannia Community Centre on Commercial Drive. For details, contact Pivot at 604-255-9700, or register by e-mailing info@bccla.org.






7) SMELL OF DEFEAT IN AFGHANISTAN

(The following editorial is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

People's Voice Editorial

The smell of defeat is in the air for the disastrous US-led military occupation of Afghanistan. An unusually blunt report by the top US commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, says "we run the risk of strategic defeat by pursuing tactical wins that cause civilian casualties or unnecessary collateral damage. The insurgents cannot defeat us militarily, be we can defeat ourselves."

     The outright theft of the recent Afghan election by US-backed President Hamid Karzai may have dealt the final blow to dwindling public support for the occupation. Even Globe and Mail columnist Margaret Wente, a diehard war supporter, recently wrote: "Iraq was the product of neo-con delusions. Afghanistan is in many ways the product of liberal delusions. Both reflect the naive but arrogant belief that outsiders can bring transformational change with good intentions and democracy." (Of course, Wente is untainted by suspicion that control of oil reserves is the true motive for the keen imperialist interest in central Asia.)

     But even these apologists can no longer ignore the horrifying evidence. Far from being on the side of the "good guys" in Afghanistan, Canadian troops are simply hired thugs for the gang of criminal warlords which currently has the support of the United States. Consider the revelations that Afghan police and soldiers systematically rape young boys at Canadian military bases, as reported by David Pugliese of Canwest News Service - hardly an "anti-war" media source.

     Remember that the next time Canadian troops are saluted for their courage by Stephen Harper, Michael Ignatieff and Jack Layton. The time to end this sickening war is now, not 2011.






8) KENNEY IMPOSING FAR-RIGHT AGENDA

(The following editorial is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

People's Voice Editorial

Racist, far-right policies are being imposed on the Canadian refugee system by Immigration Minister Jason Kenney, with the tacit approval of the Harper government.

     In a recent well-publicized case, Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) member William Davis accepted the claim by white South African Brandon Huntley, who would "stand out like a sore thumb" because of his colour in South Africa, where there is supposedly an "inability or unwillingness by the government and security forces to protect white South Africans from persecution by African South Africans."

     Abraham Sokhaya Nkomo, South Africa's high commissioner to Canada, rightly called this argument "outrageous" and has demanded that the Harper government appeal the ruling to the Federal Court of Canada. The only explanation in response has been the line that the IRB is an independent tribunal that works at arm's length from the government.

     The real story is that Jason Kenney has repeatedly attacked the validity of various refugee claims, while keeping silent on the Huntley case. His actions are undermining the Board, according to critics such as former IRB chair Peter Showler.

     Kenney has publicly called U.S. war resisters "bogus," and accuses asylum seekers from Mexico of abusing the system. Absurdly, he says that the Roma population face no state persecution in the Czech Republic, despite frequent racist and fascist attacks on their communities, and the fact that the IRB has approved most claims by Roma applicants in recent years.

     The pattern is clear. Minister Kenney is engaged in a deliberate effort to stack the deck against refugee claimants from countries and peoples which do not meet Tory political standards. And there is a long history of support for apartheid among key sectors of the current Conservative government, such as accusations that Nelson Mandela was a "terrorist".

     Jason Kenney, like the rest of the Harper gang in Ottawa, has to go, the sooner the better.






9) CLEAN UP THE TORY/CORPORATE SLUDGE

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

(From a presentation by Young Communist League General Secretary Johan Boyden on the environmental crisis.)

     We see ecological problems as deeply connected with social problems, and likewise the solutions. Perhaps nowhere is this clearer than the climate crisis. Already, youth and students around the world are mobilizing for December. That's when the world's countries, rich and poor, meet in Copenhagen for the next climate conference. Copenhagen will update the 1997 Kyoto protocol, establishing a binding global agreement from 2012.

     The colossal scale of global warming should not detract from the necessity for emboldened campaigning on other environmental fronts. Peace is an environmental issue. Water pollution, the release of toxic wastes, species extinction, unsustainable resource use, soil erosion, and desertification all pose immediate dangers. Such poisons are historically woven into the fabric of working class, Aboriginal and racialized communities which will also be hit hardest by global warming.

     Welcome to Hurricane Katrina. Welcome to the future.

     The urgency of the situation is captured in the shift of the goals leading into Copenhagen. The events the Kyoto process was supposed to prevent are already beginning. Kyoto's targets placed the overall goals at 2 degree Celsius increase. Now it is 3 degrees.

     Overwhelmingly, youth and students reject the status quo. To August's United Nations international youth day slogan, "Sustainability: our challenge, our future," you could add: "our bitter inheritance." Students and trade union youth have recently formed the Youth Climate Coalition. Planning a conference in Ottawa this October, they call to surpass Kyoto's targets.

     Our generation has seen the climate debate shift: it can no longer be denied or obscured as a long-term issue. The question now is: what will be the content and direction of the response?

     Many scientists insist that without radically change in the near term, we will reach an irreversible point. But scientific conclusions are refracted through ideological prisms and class-based realities. In Canada, business produces the vast majority of greenhouse gas emissions.(Stats Can, "Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators: Socio-economic Information", 2007, says 82% comes from the "business sector".) Modest measures of environmental protection are resisted by transnational corporations and their right-wing extremists in Parliament and in the media. The Stern Review (2006), while characterizing global warming as the "widest-ranging market failure ever seen," rejected all solutions that are not "economically viable."

     This brings the issue into sharp relief. Which comes first: nature, or profits? What social system has the capacity to arrest and reverse this crisis?

     If capitalism were compatible with solving the climate crisis, and companies could make more profits by charitably protecting the environment, we would have seen green capitalism long ago. Corporations don't need any help figuring out how to make more money. In contrast, according to the 2006 Living Planet Report, published by the World Wildlife Fund, socialist Cuba is the only country in the world that enjoys "sustainable development."

     But we don't have to wait until a socialist revolution. The strategy and tactics needed to win a better Canada and world start with today's problems. That's why we need to break with dealing with the environment like a charity issue. The claim that "the conscious consumer is the best weapon against climate change" makes the main enemy you. Drive a better car. Turn down your thermostat. Recycle.

     How many reserve communities can even afford municipal recycling? How many people living in Toronto's Jane and Finch neighbourhood already turn their thermostats way down? How many parents can't afford childcare let alone eco-holidays? How many students are unable to afford tuition, rent and dinner, let alone buy organic?

     No wonder that historically oppressed and working class communities have seen the struggle to protect the environment as "middle-class"! But there is a common link between exploitation of the environment and exploitation of working people - the capitalist class and their drive for profits. People's solutions to climate crisis must target big business as the main enemy to a sustainable environment.

     In fact, youth, workers and all people in Canada have much to gain. Can we unite the fight for Employment Insurance reform with a green housing and industrial jobs strategy? Stopping plant closures also means keeping factories under Canadian environmental regulations. Could we connect the fight against the tar sands with the call for democratic control of all energy and resources? Unlike market solutions ("cap and trade" or the carbon tax) public ownership allows democratic planning for people's needs - and is a source of funding for renewable energy and conservation programs, mass transit, free education and childcare.

     From our vantage point, meaningful parliamentary advance - like emergency legislation drastically cutting greenhouse gas emissions - isn't possible without the people's mass action. Finding the tactics to move the most people forward is complex; media stunts aren't enough. What's needed is a united mass movement of all progressive forces, championing social and ecological alternatives.

     As we head towards Copenhagen and possibly another election, we must turn up the political heat on Harper's Conservatives and the big polluting corporations. More and more Canadians realize that the only thing green coming out of these guys is sludge. Let's clean up that sludge, pushing for a real democratic and ecological alternative.






10) WILDROSE VICTORY A WAKE-UP CALL FOR ALBERTA

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

By Wayne Madden

When the Reform Party was formed in the mid-1980s, people dismissed it as a protest party even after Deborah Grey was elected in a 1989 by-election. What happened after that? As people became more upset with Mulroney's "Progressive" Conservatives, they turned to the Reform Party, which became the Official Opposition after 1997. Reform morphed into the Canadian Alliance and then swallowed the old Tories to become the very right-wing Conservative Party that govern Canada today.

     One wonders if Stephen Harper would be Prime Minister today if other parties had taken the Reform Party more seriously.

     On Sept. 14, the Wildrose Alliance Party (WAP) was elected in a provincial by-election in Calgary-Glenmore. Many commentators dismiss this as a mere protest vote against "Progressive" Conservative Premier Ed Stelmach - a serious mistake.

     Alberta's Tory government has been in power for 38 years now. It is tired and out of touch with popular opinion. Recent economic problems only show the cracks in the party armour as it struggles to deal with health care issues, royalties charged to energy companies and the first provincial deficit in many years. The Liberal Official Opposition has been largely ineffective. The NDP is more effective, but the NDP record in other provinces, and the power of the energy industry have made it almost impossible for the party to strike a chord with most Albertans.

     On the other hand, the WAP, formed in 2008 from a merger of the Alberta Alliance Party (AAP) and the Wildrose Party is attracting attention. In 2004, the AAP won one rural riding, electing Paul Hinman, who narrowly lost his seat in 2008. Now, Hinman returns to the legislature from an urban constituency, a month before a vote to elect his successor as party leader.

     The WAP proudly stands to the right of the Tories, but how far? There are some clues. Most of its extensive policy statements are vague, open to different interpretations, for example: "build a unified, universal and cost effective health services information network that will improve and reduce long term costs."

     The WAP would accelerate privatization of government services and erosion of workers' rights. They promise to "allow individual workers the choice to determine their membership in labour organizations", knowing full well that this option undermines the ability of workers to negotiate effective collective agreements. The party would also "allow competition to the Workers' Compensation Board", compromising the quality of protection for injured workers.

     Other policies include withdrawing from the Canada Pension Plan (setting up an Alberta Pension Plan), denying teachers the right to strike, full funding for private schools, and a rather threatening statement to "defend Alberta against intrusion by the federal government by protecting the property,legal, constitutional and democratic rights of Albertans."

     Most ominous is a policy to "defend free speech" by striking Section 3 (banning use of hate speech and hate literature to cause discrimination or contempt against persons or groups) from the Alberta Human Rights and Multiculturalism Act.

     Three candidates are seeking the WAP leadership on Oct. 17: Danielle Smith, Mark Dyrholm and Jeff Willerton. Most pundits believe the race is between Smith and Dyrholm, but if the race is close, Willerton could influence the policies of the winner.

     Smith is considered the "libertarian" candidate, giving business a free hand, but also leaving people free to choose on social issues such as reproductive rights and same-sex marriage. Dyrholm favours "social conservative" policies and government run by business owners. Mike Havery, his campaign chair, notes his membership in right-wing groups such as Focus on the Family, Canada Family Action Coalition, the Citizen's Centre for Freedom and Democracy, the Progressive Group for Independent Business and the National Citizen's Coalition.

     Perhaps Willerton gives the best indication of the WAP's real goals. He introduces himself on his website as "a writer, a businessman, an advocate of free speech, one who has not drunk from the Kyoto Kool-Aid and gives short shrift to those who peddle junk science in the name of increasing your tax burden (i.e.: through carbon taxes)."

     He promises to protect free speech by censuring "the Alberta Human Rights Commission for its history of abuses", opposes higher energy resource royalties "to restore Alberta's "international reputation as a safe place to do business", and promises referendums on separation "each and every time a Liberal Government is elected or reelected in Ottawa." He engages in red-baiting, calling Liberal leader David Swann a "socialist" and referring to Brian Mason's former membership in the Communist Party. One curious statement reads, "Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner. Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the results. What I'm offering you is simply the armour to prevent the wolves from taking over again."

     The "Willerton A-Z" alphabet extends this red-baiting, calling socialism and liberalism the "defective offspring" of Communism. Then he attacks labour unions, noting that Dave Werlin headed the Alberta Federation of Labour during the Gainers' strike of 1986. Praising the anti-labour actions of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher, he states: "I'll just not soon be blackmailed by their (nurses, teachers, union members) collectives."

     While saying he is "not anti-Gay", Willerton ties same-sex marriage with polygamy, and writes, "Why is this (same-sex marriage) destructive? Because gay marriage is a huge step toward the complete normalization or mainstreaming of homosexuality... a lifestyle that almost invariably leads to their premature, childless demise, robbing society of both themselves and their progeny?" No wonder he opposes provisions in human rights laws against hate speech!

     These things cannot be ignored. While we must defend true free speech in a democracy, doing so does not include defending irresponsible hate speech aimed at causing harm to others. Using "free speech", Hitler advocated hate and fear against minorities and opponents. He was regarded as a buffoon, but soon sections of the German corporate ruling elite decided he was the leader who could block the left from achieving power and switched their support from "conservative" and "centrist" parties to him. Once achieving power, true free speech was quickly criminalized, but hate speech continued against Jews, socialists and communists, LGBT people and even many Christians.

     Even if the supposed "moderate", Danielle Smith is elected leader, the power of the right wing of the WAP will certainly assert itself in policies and candidates. Progressive thinking Albertans must not ignore the rise of the Wildrose Alliance Party.






11) Bill 177 - BACK TO HARRIS TORY POLICIES

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

By Liz Rowley

Supporters of local autonomy and democracy are organizing to defeat the Ontario Ministry of Labour's Bill 177, which aims to transform locally elected School Boards into being transmission belts for the government's austerity and privatization policies.

     Bill 177 closely tracks Harris Tory legislation which was repealed by the McGuinty Liberals in 2003-4. Under the new bill's regulations, School Boards and Trustees that fail to comply can be put under provincial supervision (trusteeship) and removed from office.

     Instead of bringing in the needs-based education funding formula promised in the 2003 and 2007 Liberal campaigns, the government is continuing to under-fund and privatize education.

     As public pressure builds to deliver better quality education and services, School Boards are demanding more and better funding from the province and the Ministry of Education.

     The same thing is happening in Ontario hospitals, where funding cuts are creating long waits for emergency treatment and for non-existent beds in closed wards. Operating at 98% capacity, hospitals are over-crowded breeding grounds for super-bugs like C-Difficile. Hospital boards are also demanding adequate funding, and an end to balanced budget legislation which makes it illegal to run deficits or borrow against capital accountants.

     The province has vaporized mostly appointed hospital boards, despite public outcries. The same fate might happen to School Boards if not for constitutional protections of the Catholic Boards, which the courts have deemed also protect the public system. This was put to the test by the Harris government when it sought to abolish locally elected School Boards. 

     Thus, Bill 177 has been created to convert School Boards into bodies controlled and accountable to the Provincial government.

     As the Communist Party of Canada (Ontario) brief noted: "Bill 177 and its regulations are shot through with the central obligation of School Boards `to ensure effective stewardship of the Board's resources', `to effectively use the resources entrusted to it', to `use the resources entrusted to it for the purposes of delivering effective and appropriate education', and most Machiavellian of all, to `manage the resources entrusted to it in a manner that upholds public confidence'. (Appendix A: Bill 177 - Duties and Powers of School Boards)"

     Those Boards and Trustees which refuse to sell budget cuts "in a manner that upholds public confidence", will face the measures set out in Appendix B: Section 11.1 - Provincial Interest Regulations, which state that the Ministry can "require a board to adopt and implement measures specified in the regulation to ensure that the board's funds and other resources are applied (i) effectively, and (ii) in compliance with this Act, the regulations and the policies and guidelines made under this Act."

     Ironically, the Minister responsible for this Bill is Kathleen Wynne, a former Toronto Trustee prominent in the fight against budget cuts and trusteeship imposed by the Harris government. Knowing that the public would fight Bill 177, Wynne organized "consultations" by email, during July and August.

     The Bill is being fast-tracked through the Legislature in hopes that the public won't have time to mobilize against it. Another tactic is to distract attention from the real contents of the Bill by making much of over-billing of personal expenses by some Trustees in the Toronto Catholic Board. All of the questionable bills have been repaid, and no charges were ever laid.

     The Communist Party and others say this is a fig leaf, not comparable to the real corruption of Liberal and Tory appointees to the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Commission and to EHealth Ontario, where millions of dollars are missing.

     The over-billing by some Trustees is the result of savage cuts to honoraria by the Harris government, and caps by the McGuinty government which force Trustees to service wards that are twice as large as federal ridings, for a maximum of $20,000 a year.

     The CPC (Ontario) is calling on the government to withdraw Bill 177 and instead draft new legislation to restore and enhance the powers of Ontario's local School Boards, including:

* a needs-based funding formula to guarantee adequate and stable funding to public School Boards and a universal, quality system of public education.

* remove education from the property tax, and fund education from provincial general revenues.

* repeal balanced budget legislation affecting school boards, hospitals, and municipalities.

* strengthen local autonomy and democracy for School Boards.

* restore the right of Boards and communities to set appropriate honoraria and benefits for Trustees.

* provide status for School Boards and municipalities in the Canadian Constitution.

* repeal Harris era "Secondary reform" and introduce a broad based liberal arts curricula, including Canadian history, Aboriginal history, and labour and women's studies.

* repeal standardized testing.

* fight for ESL funding, and fund Special Education to meet the needs of all students.

* fund hot breakfast and lunch programs.

     Now that school is back, education activists are moving quickly to mobilize parents, students and community to defeat this Bill, and to make next fall's province-wide School Board elections a referendum on Liberal education policy.

     To move forward, the friends of public education will have to mobilize to field candidates with programs that call for a new needs-based provincial funding formula and strong local autonomy and democracy for School Boards and communities. Trustees must not only be elected by communities, but be fully accountable to them as well.

     - Liz Rowley is the leader of the CPC (Ontario), and a former school trustee.






12) H1N1, PUBLIC HEALTH AND RACISM INTERTWINED

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

By Kimball Cariou

The related issues of public health, racism, governmental incompetence and corporate profiteering took a nasty twist in mid-September with the news that northern Manitoba reserves have been sent body bags instead of medical supplies to fight outbreaks of the H1N1 swine flu.

     Residents of half a dozen Aboriginal communities were outraged when about 200 body bags were delivered in response to demands for resources to fight a second wave of the H1N1 flu outbreak. The shipments were seen as a dire prediction of official expectations of the flu's impact on Aboriginal peoples, who were hardest hit by the first outbreak last spring.

     Leaders of the communities returned the bags to a Health Canada office in Winnipeg, calling the deliveries an insult. Each bag contained full post-mortem kits including a chin strap, five tie-straps and three identification tags. The shipments also included hand sanitizers, masks and gloves.  

     Rod Harper, a spokesperson for the band council of the Wasagamack First Nation, 600 kilometres north of Winnipeg, said "What we had asked for stockpiling were Advil, Tylenol, vaccine, not body bags."

     "Is Canada giving up on the first nations?" Garden Hill First Nation Chief David Harper asked in an interview. "We're very offended. It looks like Canada is giving up on us. Or is this the flu preparedness that Canada talks about?" In many First Nations cultures, to prepare for death is to invite death, he said.

     Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq was "disturbed" to hear about the shipments, and ordered an immediate inquiry, but she declined to comment on who sent the body bags.

     Aboriginal communities fear they are unprepared for another wave of the flu. The outbreak last spring affected relatively few Canadians, but sparked a crisis on several Manitoba reserves. At one point, Aboriginals comprised two-thirds of Manitoba flu patients on respirators. The situation made it clear that after many years of underfunding, Canada's health system could easily be overwhelmed by H1N1.

     Health Canada had been reluctant to send hand sanitizer to Manitoba reserves, absurdly claiming that residents would ingest the alcohol-based gel. The Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs has solicited donations for 15,000 flu kits for northern communities, and the Manitoba government has agreed to cover part of the cost. But Aglukkaq claims that nursing stations on reserves are stocked with medical supplies, and that the kits are not necessary.

     Researchers think the new pandemic H1N1 influenza circulated undetected in pigs for at least a decade before it jumped to people, making a mutational shift. First detected in April, H1N1 was declared a pandemic in June. It has spread quickly around the world but in most cases causes only moderate illness. The disease has been worse in low-income, overcrowded communities, such as many reserves in Canada. So far, the version of pandemic H1N1 circulating is not mutating, which could pose far more dangerous consquences, but experts expect it eventually will begin to change.

     As People's Voice reported in our May 16-31 issue, H1N1 may have emerged from a giant pig factory farm run by a U.S. multinational in Veracruz, Mexico. Such factory farms cram thousands of pigs into dirty warehouses where they are sprayed with a cocktail of drugs. These operations and their manure lagoons create perfect conditions to breed dangerous new viruses like swine flu.

     Smithfield Corporation, the largest pig producer in the world, owns the farm which may have been the source of the H1N1 outbreak. The company denies any connection, but the World Health Organization has warned that a new pandemic is inevitable. The European Commission and the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization have cautioned that the rapid move from small holdings to industrial pig production is increasing the risk of development and transmission of epidemics.

     Profits are involved in this issue in another way, in terms of the multinational pharmceutical corporations which produce vaccines. Some opponents argue that widespread vaccination will not prevent the virus from spreading, or that the extent of the danger posed by H1N1 is overstated. Public authorities in Canada and other countries are understandably reluctant to gamble that vaccinations are unnecessary, given the potentially deadly impact of a larger outbreak over the coming fall and winter.

     It is true that the debate over how to respond to global pandemics is distorted by the "medical-industrial complex" which puts profits ahead of health care workers and the public. At the same time, Canadians are justifiably angry that underfunding of health care weakens the system's ability to prevent and minimize the effect of epidemics.

     Whoever made the appalling decision to ship body bags to northern Manitoba did Canadians one favour; this racist act has launched a serious debate around a wide range of troubling questions which need solid answers.






13) PROSECUTORS RELUCTANT TO TREAT GAY-BASHINGS AS HATE CRIMES

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

By Kimball Cariou

Despite violent gay-bashings in cities across Canada, police and/or prosecutors are still reluctant to treat these attacks as hate crimes, a designation which would require tougher sentencing for offenders.

     In the latest shocking case, a Toronto gay man's face was shattered during a visit to Thunder Bay. Jake Raynard and two friends were smoking outside a downtown bar after last call on Sept. 4 when a man approached them for a cigarette and then became aggressive. As the three friends walked away, a group of men followed them shouting homophobic taunts. Suddenly, one of the group grabbed Raynard's friend and started choking him. Raynard managed to help get his friends into a taxi, but was blocked from entering. He ran through a nearby alley towards a local restaurant as the men chased him, but was caught and beaten with a brick.

     According to reports, it took police an hour to respond to the calls of restaurant workers who found Raynard banging for help on their windows. He had to undergo facial reconstruction for injuries including a broken jaw, broken eye socket and broken upper patella.      A Facebook page called "Unified Community around Jake Raynard" now has more than 7,700 members, and over 1200 people took part in a support rally on Sept. 11. Thunder Bay Police are still investigating; it has not been decided if the incident will be labelled a hate crime.

     Similar crimes have recently occurred in other cities, including two cases in Vancouver. In September 2008, Jordan Smith was holding hands with his partner on Davie Street when the couple was met by a group of men shouting homophobic slurs. One of the group, Michael Kandola, is alleged to have punched Smith in the face without warning, causing serious facial damage. Kandola's trial is set for next April, but prosecutors have not decided whether this will be considered a hate crime.

     In another tragedy, 62-year-old Ritchie Dowrey was punched in the face at the Fountainhead Pub on Davie last March 13. The blow knocked Dowrey to the floor, causing severe brain damage. His attacker, Shawn Woodward, was reported by witnesses to have said "he's a faggot, he deserved it". Woodward has been charged with aggravated assault, but proceedings been postponed several times, and again, no decision has been made on designating the attack as a hate crime.

     "This story isn't just mine," says John Raynard. "I'm sure there's many other people out there who have encountered a lot of the same problems that I have in my life, and have encountered hate-related crimes and a lot of discrimination based on that. I would urge them to come forward and make their stories known and have it so we can start to heal as a community and start to move forward beyond this kind of hate."

     Commenting on recent calls for dropping hate crime laws, Egale Canada President Helen Kennedy has responded that "when a crime is motivated by blind hatred, a crime such as that perpetrated against Jake Raynard, it goes beyond any negotiable goal. It is the desire to hurt, to denigrate, and to destroy. Any time someone is attacked for their gender identity or sexual orientation they are not just assaulted physically, they are treated as less than human, and that is what we must fight every day with every breath to counter such brutality...

     "Jake Raynard is not an object. Anji Dimitriou, lesbian mother, viciously attacked, is not an object. Tyli'a Mack, trans woman, brutally murdered, is not an object. Ritchie Dowrey, gay man, viciously attacked, is not an object. We are not objects; we are not fragments of people. We are the many achingly beautiful faces of humanity and must hold ourselves with pride. When anyone is attacked this way, when anyone is reduced in this fashion, we must respond or we are all made a little less... We demand that our governments, municipal, provincial and federal, protect our rights and stand with us!"






14) A TASTE, BUT NOT A COMPLETE MEAL

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

Norman Bethune, by Adrienne Clarkson, Penguin Group (Canada), Toronto, 2009, ISBN 978-0670067312, review by Liz Rowley

     Adrienne Clarkson's new book on Norman Bethune, at 190 small pages of big-print, is interesting, mostly factual, and a contribution to the literature about this extraordinary Canadian patriot and Communist.

     But it's not the book that still reigns as the authority on the life and times of Norman Bethune - Ted Allen and Sydney Gordon's The Scalpel, The Sword, published in 1952.

     What's different is the class perspective that Allen and Gordon display in their retelling of the 1930s in Canada, and the much deeper appreciation of the movement of which Bethune was a part and a leader.

     Clarkson attributes Bethune's internationalism and his travel to Republican Spain and China, to his parents' Presbyterian religious convictions, and their missionary zeal for religious conversions in China. It was his childhood and his father's ministry that propelled him to the anti-fascist cause, she asserts. In fact, Bethune's work in Spain was the result of a decision taken by the Communist Party of Canada that he should go there, and then return to undertake a speaking tour to mobilize recruits and material support for Republican cause.

     Bethune was a member of the Communist Party, a fact Clarkson deals with as an oddity, not as a core part of his personality and world outlook. She mentions his self-penned obituary, written when he was battling tuberculosis: "Norman Bethune: Born a bourgeois, Died a Communist", and his artistic renderings of himself in a hospital bed reading Karl Marx. These, she suggests, are somehow the evidence of oddity, perhaps brilliance, but not wisdom.

     At a speaking engagement about her book, held at a medical symposium in Toronto last June, Clarkson said that had Bethune survived the war in China, she was quite sure he would have soon left the Communist Party of Canada.

     Such statements are astonishing - baseless conjecture, without facts to back them up. Everything Bethune did was connected to the Communist Party, and he is fact the Party's most celebrated member. His views about the need for a system of socialized medicine in Canada, and his work with others to develop a plan for how that system might be achieved, were embraced and reflected in the Communist Party. He made his home in the CPC because its policies and outlook (developed from its birth in 1921) reflected his own ideas. More than anything, Bethune raged against the class foundations of capitalist society, which were the cause of war, exploitation, and oppression, and he fought for and extolled the virtues of socialism.

     This is what is missing in Clarkson's book - well, almost missing. A section near the end deals with Bethune's time in China with Jean Ewen, a Canadian nurse and the daughter of prominent Canadian Communist Tom McEwen. Along with Tim Buck and six other Party leaders, McEwen was arrested in 1931 for sedition and jailed in Kingston Penitentiary. The play Eight Men Speak is about them.

     Clarkson focuses on Jean Ewen's anger at her father "who was more interested in socialism than in being a father", and on petty criticisms of Bethune which reflect the abysmal conditions in which they were forced to work medical miracles by dint of fascist occupation and war. Bethune personified courage, valour and determination to save lives without any thought to himself, and little to Jean. They were the only doctor and nurse for hundreds of miles, and civilians and soldiers alike were dying by the hundreds and thousands. Could it have been any other way?

     It seems unfair that Clarkson would choose to spend so much time on Ewen's memoirs. No doubt the hardships in China were real, and no doubt Bethune had a strong personality (like Ewen's, it seems), and little time for democracy on the battlefield. 

     What we get from Clarkson's telling is that Bethune was an extraordinary man, whom most Canadians aren't familiar with, and should be. That he was a great Canadian, who fought fascism in Spain and China (thanks mainly to his Presbyterian missionary upbringing), and that he should be recognized by his country as a great anti-fascist. We also learn that he was, oddly, a Communist; something that Clarkson tells her readers was a passing thing, a brief encounter that he would have shucked had he lived. 

     Allen and Gordon give a much fuller and truer picture of Bethune's life and activities. Yes, he was an anti-fascist, a Communist, a humanitarian, an artist, a lover of life. And yes, his life was complicated by his politics, including his personal life. He could have stayed home, made a lot of money from his medical innovations, remained married to a woman largely disinterested in his life and activities, and made peace with the Canadian establishment.

     But he didn't, and not because of his Presbyterian parents. He fought against fascism, but he also fought for socialism, for a new world. He wasn't ordinary. He knew what the future looked like, and he wanted the world to get there without passing through the fascist fire that left 50 million dead. This is what Allen and Gordon more accurately portray in The Scalpel, The Sword. 

     Read Clarkson's book for a taste; read Allen and Gordon for the meat and potatoes.






15) "ALMEIDA LIVES TODAY MORE THAN EVER"

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

Cuba declared Sept. 14 a National Day of Mourning in memory of Juan Almeida Bosque, who commanded the Third Front in the Rebel Army which overthrew the dictator Fulgencio Batista. The 82-year-old "Commander of the Revolution" died of a heart attack late in the evening of Sept. 12. Tens of thousands of Cubans paid tribute to Almeida at the Jose Marti Memorial in Havana, and much of the country's TV programming was devoted to documentary footage of this remarkable revolutionary.

     Born Feb. 27, 1927, Juan Almeida began work as a bricklayer at the age of eleven. In March 1952, as a law student at the University of Havana, he met Fidel Castro, another aspiring attorney, and joined the fight against the dictatorship.

     Almeida took part in the armed attack on the Moncada military barracks in the eastern city of Santiago, on July 26, 1953. He and other captured survivors, including Fidel and Raul Castro, were sent to prison on Isla de los Pinos, later renamed Isla de la Juventud (Isle of Youth). After being granted an amnesty in May 1955, Almeida accompanied Fidel and other comrades to Mexico. There they formed a guerrilla army which returned in December 1956 on the yacht Granma to launch their battle from the Sierra Maestra region.

     Almeida, the Castro brothers and Ernesto "Che" Guevara were among only 16 who survived the landing, in which most of the rebels were killed by Batista's troops. "No one here gives up!" Almeida shouted to Guevara at the time, giving the Cuban revolution one of its most lasting slogans. As a guerrilla leader, Almeida later headed the Third Front of military operations in eastern Cuba.

     After Batista fled on New Year's Day 1959, Almeida served in various military posts, ranging from head of motorized units to chief of the Rebel Army's Air Force. He later was named a vice minister and chief of staff of the Revolutionary Armed Forces. He was a member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba, which held its first congress in October 1965 after the merger of Fidel's July 26 Movement, the Popular Socialist Party (Cuba's original Communist Party), and the Revolutionary Directorate.

     Almeida served as a vice-president of the Council of State, the country's supreme governing body, and headed the National Association of Veterans and Combatants of the Revolution. As well as his political activities, Almeida was a composer of traditional Cuban music and a writer. His books include the popular trilogy of reminiscences, Military Prison, Exile, and Disembarkation. He cut back on public activities in December 2003, suffering from heart problems, but remained a member of the country's leadership.

     Along with Ramiro Valdes and Guillermo Garcia, he had been among only three remaining Comandantes de la Revolucion, a title reserved for top leaders of rebel troops under Fidel Castro's command.

     A statement from the Cuban government called Juan Almeida "a paradigm of revolutionary strength, solid convictions, bravery, patriotism and service to the people." He was given a military funeral at a mausoleum near Santiago de Cuba.

     Fidel Castro wrote in one of his "Reflections" on Sept. 13, "I have been watching for hours now on television the tribute that the entire country is paying to Commander of the Revolution Juan Almeida Bosque. I think that facing death was for him just another duty as so many others he made throughout his life. He did not know, neither did we how much sadness the news of his physical absence would bring to us.

     "I was privileged to know that young black militant worker who would successively be the leader of a revolutionary group, a combatant at the Moncada, a comrade in prison, a platoon captain at the time of the Granma landing, an officer with the Rebel Army - held back by a shot on his chest during the violent combat at Uvero - the Commander of a column marching on to create the Third Eastern Front, and the comrade sharing the leadership of our forces in the last successful battles to overthrow the tyranny.

     "I was an exceptional witness to his exemplary conduct for over half a century of heroic and victorious resistance in the struggle against the bandits, during the Giron counteroffensive, the Missile Crisis, the internationalist missions and the resistance to the imperialist blockade.

     "It was a pleasure to listen to some of his songs, especially the one particularly emotional where he bade farewell to human dreams in response to the homeland's call to `win or die'. I was not aware that he had composed over 300 songs in addition to his literary work, a source of historical narratives and enjoyable readings. He defended principles of justice that will be defended at any time and age while human beings breathe on Earth.

     "Let's not say that Almeida is dead! Almeida lives today more than ever!"





16) YOUTH UNION CONFERENCE PLANNED IN PERU

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

PV Vancouver Bureau

The First International Conference of young trade unionists will meet Nov. 18-20 in Lima, Peru. The gathering will be hosted by the General Confederation of Workers of Peru (CGTP) and the World Federation of Trade Unions (WFTU), which have issued a call to all affiliated and friendly organizations to participate.

     The Call to the Conference stresses that "the dictatorship of the capitalist system has been intensified since the 70s". Since then, it points out, the "gurus" of neoliberalism and their instruments (International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, etc.) convinced neoliberal and social democratic political parties and governments to implement widespread privatization and deregulation.

     On the status of young workers, the Call warns that youth unemployment increased globally during 1995-2005 from 74 million to 85 million, an increase of 14.8%. Now, the number of unemployed young workers is unofficially estimated to be over 100 million. The ILO says in its 2006 report that 25% of the youth population in the world - over 300 million - live below the poverty line.

     In Latin America and the Caribbean, the number of unemployed youth increased from 7.7 million to 9.5 million during the years 1995-2005, with the rate climbing from 14.4% to 16.6%. Today those figures are increasing rapidly. Some 16.7 million young people in this region, or 35% of those who still have jobs, are below the poverty threshold because of low wages, while 6.3 million live in extreme poverty.

     Outsourcing is another major problem of young workers. "Junk contracts" are used to hire workers for medium and large enterprises at minimal wages, without social or labour rights, unable to join trade unions and subject to the agony of waiting for a new contract. "If this continues," warn the conference organizers, "the future of the trade union movement is in danger, mainly in underdeveloped countries."

     This difficult situation has forced large numbers of young men and women from Latin America, Asia, Africa and the former socialist countries to migrate to developed countries like the USA, Japan and the European Union. Seeking work and better opportunities, these youth are facing xenophobic treatment and denial of their rights as workers. They receive miserable wages and are usually considered as "illegal" or "undocumented". European Union governments have intensified their persecution of immigrants, passing laws of expulsion and imprisonment, under the pretext that they are stealing jobs from European citizens.

     In recent years, thousands of young Mexicans and Latin Americans have been killed by the US police in the US-Mexico border. Those who managed to enter US territory are frequently persecuted as criminals, and arrested and deported.

     The same happens with thousands of young people, including children, from countries in Africa and Asia. Many are dying almost every day, drowning in the ocean in their desire to reach the coast of Spain or Italy. Those who manage to arrive are arrested and deported to their countries of origin. The capitalist system is concerned about the free transit of goods and speculative capital, but has prohibited the free transit of humans beings.

     Created in Paris in October 1945, the World Federation of Trade Unions was at the time the only global labour organization. Its consistent stand against war and for class struggle trade unionism led supporters of US imperialism to divide the WFTU in 1949. In recent decades, with the collapse of the socialist bloc, the WFTU was the target of continuous demonization campaigns funded by pro-imperialist forces.

     But the WFTU has survived by reaffirming the principles of unity and class solidarity. The WFTU's most recent congress was held in Cuba in 2005, and the federation continues to gain new strength. The youth conference in Peru is an important expression of the renewed level of activity by the WFTU and its affiliates.

Printer- friendly article
(Contents)
(Home)





17) WHAT'S LEFT

(The following article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for U.S. readers and  overseas readers - $50 per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)

VANCOUVER, BC

Left Film Nights - at the Centre for Socialist Education, 706Clark Drive,
  • Sunday, Sept. 27, 7 pm, The Power of Song, documentary on the life of Pete Seeger.
  •  In October see - Cocalero and Freedom Fighters (Las Libertarias), Sat., Oct. 17, 7 pm.
 Free admission, donations welcome, info: 604-255-2041.

Civil Liberties and the 2010 Olympics, panel forum - Monday, Sept. 28, 7-9 pm, Fletcher Challenge Theatre, SFU Harbour Centre. Hosted by Am Johal, chair of Impact On Communities Coalition.

StopWar monthly meeting, planning for fall events - 5:30 pm, Wed., Oct. 7, at Maritime Labour Centre, entrance by parking lot, 111 Victoria Drive, see http://www.stopwar.ca. Yard Sale at the Russian Hall, 600 Campbell Ave., Sat., Oct. 17, 11 am-3 pm, call 604-254-9932 for info.

In Our Own Voices, join the Downtown Eastside Power of Women Group for storytelling, poetry, reflection, and resistance - Sat., Oct. 24, 7 pm, Rhizome Cafe, 317 E. Broadway, by donation $0-20.

TORONTO, ON

Trilateral Peace Conference - Oct. 2-4, AUUC Cultural Centre, 1604 Bloor St. West, with speakers from Canadian Peace Congress, US Peace Council, MOMPADE (Mexico), and MOVPAZ (Cuba). For full details and program, email dmckee@canadianpeacecongress.ca.

Celebrate World Peace Council 60th Anniversary - Sat., Oct. 3, 7:30 pm, AUUC Cultural Centre, 1604 Bloor St. West, with guests from Cuba, Mexico and the US, entertainment with Wally Brooker and Mark Sepic, admission $10. For info email: dmckee@canadianpeacecongress.ca.

Cine Cuba, Cuban film festival sponsored by CCFA-Toronto - Thursday, Oct. 22 and Friday, Oct. 23, Revue Cinema, 400 Roncesvalles Ave., starts 7 pm, second showing 9 pm. For films check http://www.revuecinema.ca and http://www.ccfatoronto.ca.

SASKATOON, SK


Political discussion & beer, all welcome to join Saskatoon CPC members -
third Monday of every month, in the tv room at Amigo’s, 632-10 St. East.

BRAMPTON, ON

Will the Working People Pay? Forum with Liz Rowley, member of the Central Executive  Ctee. CPC- on Sat., Sept. 26, in the party room at 210 Steeles Ave. W. (west of Shoppers  World). Refreshments at 2 pm, speaker from 2:30. Everyone welcome, organized by GTA  West Club.

HAMILTON, ON

Solidarity House classes - at 779 Barton St. East (parking at rear). Wednesdays 7-9, Introduction to Spoken Spanish, $10 suggested donation - bring your dictionary! Saturdays 12-2 - Das Kapital, video & discussion.

JOSHUA KEY TOUR

For info on speaking tour by war resister Joshua Key, and times and places in these cities, call 204-792-3371.
  • Kamloops (Sept. 25), 
  • Kelowna (Sept. 27),
  • Vernon (Sept. 28),
  • Grand Forks (Sept. 29),
  • Lethbridge (Oct. 1),
  • Medicine Hat (Oct. 2).
Printer- friendly article

(Contents)
(Home)





sitemap