ONTARIO SUSPENDS
HOMECARE COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS
(The
following article is from
the March 1-15,
2008
issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles
can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in
Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per
year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133 Herkimer St. Unit 502,
Hamilton,
ON, L8P 2H3).
PV Ontario Bureau
Public
pressure from the trade union movement and the Ontario Health Coalition
(OHC) has led to a province-wide suspension of competitive bidding in
homecare, People's Voice has learned. In February, PV reported on
public protests in Hamilton that brought together 1,500 people in a
town hall meeting, in response to what demonstrators called the
McGuinty Liberal government's move to wipe out "over 100 years of
non-profit home care."
Homecare was a non-profit public service in Ontario until 1996. That's
when the province introduced competitive bidding, under which private
for-profit corporations compete for contracts against non-profit
providers - community agencies controlled by a locally elected Board of
Directors. According to the OHC, 80 to 90 percent of the costs for
providing homecare are nurse and homemaker salaries and benefits. In
2004, under broad public pressure, the province put a moratorium on
bids until fall 2007.
Recent
protests were also organized in Sarnia, Thunder Bay, Sudbury and Guelph
after a December ruling in a competitive bidding process found that the
Victorian Order of Nurses and St. Joseph's Home Care were not eligible
to submit requests for proposals to provide home care services in
Hamilton. The two organizations are the largest not-for-profit agencies
in the region, providing about 80 percent of home nursing care.
According to the Health Coalition, this would disrupt service,
particularly for the elderly. "Homecare nursing and support are a vital
part of the health-care system [and] should be treated as a
professional public service rather than a commodity bought and sold for
profit" the Coalition stated in a release. Unions have also pointed out
that competitive bidding undermines decent working conditions.
The
province first suspended competitive bidding in Hamilton and then
extended it province-wide. Health Minister George Smitherman has now
issued a letter calling for consultations with the community and
providers across Ontario.
The
call for more hearings has left some commentators saying "we have been
through this before," as Derrell Dular of the Older Canadian's Network
said in a release. The Eleanor Caplan hearings several years ago
previously addressed competitive bidding. At the time, several unions
and community groups were critical of Caplan's limited mandate,
producing a costly and time-wasting report with no major results.
"Competitive bidding was introduced by the Harris government to axe the
grants to the Victorian Order of Nurses and the Red Cross and bring the
for-profit multinationals into homecare," Natalie Mehra, Director of
the Ontario Health Coalition stated. "It fragments rather than
integrates care, turning providers into competitors who refuse to share
information. It costs more and leads to all kinds of unnecessary
duplication. It has reduced the scope of public coverage, it is a
disaster for staffing shortages, it is for-profit clinical health
care," she added.
Labour
and community groups are now meeting to map out an action plan.
Representatives from SEIU, OPSEU, CUPE, ONA as well as local health
coalition, seniors' organizations and others are expected to demand
solutions such as provision of care by more local community-controlled
not-for-profit providers; removing the prohibition against direct
provision of care by the Community Care Access Centres; restoring
democratic community governance of homecare services; establishing
terms of employment that are equal to other sectors; and the complete
end of competitive bidding.
"This
is not just a victory for home care, but also health care," CUPE
researcher Doug Allen told People's Voice. "It clearly shows that
competitive bidding and the market delivery of health care doesn't
work, wastes money, and is inefficient." After years of fighting on
this issue, Allen said he is left with the feeling "we were right all
along."
Found at:
http://www.peoplesvoice.ca/articleprint13/04%20ONTARIO_SUSPENDS_HOMECARE_COMPETITIVE_BIDDING_PROCESS.html