01) OBSERVE OR
INTERVENE: WHAT IS THE ROLE OF LABOUR?
(The
following
article is from the November 1-15, 2008, issue of People's Voice,
Canada's
leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the
source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low
income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers
- $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business
Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)
By Sam Hammond,
chair of the Central Trade Union Commission, Communist Party of Canada
In the World
Trade Organization,
from the very beginning the world's largest banks, insurance companies
and financial institutions based in the imperialist countries have
ruled the roost and bullied acceptance of their neo-liberal global
agenda. Wearing silk suits and carrying battle maces, their lobbyists
have blackmailed and threatened developing countries and junior
imperialist supplicants like Canada into acceptance of the myth that
their General Agreement on Trade In Services (GATS) and General
Agreement on Trade & Tariffs (GATT) are beneficial to
them. This
spawned NAFTA and threw away the Auto Pact, amongst other deep
penetrations and acquisitions of our economy. It was and is the basis
of the destruction of our manufacturing base and the transition to a
supplier of cheap energy and resources, the export of jobs, attacks on
public social programs, falling wages and general impoverishment of
very large sections of the Canadian working class.
But the
worst is yet to come, as
these policies of deregulation and unfettered flow of capital impact
internationally and sharpen the traditional antagonistic contradictions
of capitalism. As millions starve and more millions totter on the
brink, as pension funds bleed billions in losses and people watch their
quality of life and their jobs disappear, where are the perpetrators of
this calamity?
They are
sitting in their
offices, waiting for government bail-out cheques, money ripped from our
wages, pensions or social assistance, to purchase their failed assets.
They will receive hard cash for worthless paper, which we now must work
for the next generation or so to give value to so they can steal it
again. We have purchased their deregulated crimes with the future of
our children.
The
wordsmiths of barbarity and
exploitation have re-christened us as "collateral damage".
Under-utilized as the identifier of a few thousand murdered civilians,
this cute literary phrase now develops its full potential as the
moniker of the entire global non-capitalist population. But the movers
and shakers of the WTO, GATS, GATT and the World Bank have not gone to
confession, because they do not admit their sins.
Consider
this quote from a
Briefing Paper authoured by Ellen Gould for the Canadian Centre for
Policy Alternatives (CCPA): "Former advocates of deregulation are
conceding that given the severity of the sub prime crisis, new
regulations will have to be imposed on the financial industry. But even
as these regulations are being drafted, a deregulation agenda is being
advanced at the World Trade Organization... Governments are under
pressure to remove conditions on foreign entry into their financial
markets and to impose `disciplines' on their regulations."
The cat is
out of the bag, the
wolves will remain wolves. But will the people of the world willingly
remain at the bottom of the food chain? Not according to the people of
Latin America, but more on that later.
The auto
companies globally are
symptomatic of the problems of imperialist rivalry, mutual corporate
plunder, super-exploitation, migration of capital and relative
over-production. In other words, a deregulated Shangri-la that they
have turned into a dangerous vehicle of ruin. They are also big bankers
(GMAC, Ford Motor Credit and Chrysler Financial) who deal in auto loans
and leasing the way other bankers and speculators deal in home
mortgages.
Japan, the
United States and
China are the three largest auto producers in the world (in that
order), and Canada is ninth. There were 73 million vehicles produced
globally in 2007 (2.6 million in Canada). Through their financial
institutions, the auto makers still own a large percentage of the
vehicles which they have out on lease. As people default on leases or
auto payments, the cash flow dries up, and the same financial crisis
develops that we see in mortgages, for the same reasons.
Of the $700
billion bail-out
package approved by the U.S. government to buy debt with public funds,
$25 billion is slated to the auto companies, but not one penny to an
unemployed auto worker.
To add
insult to injury, GM has
requested an additional low interest loan of $10 billion from the Feds,
to justify a bank loan of another $10 billion. For what purpose? So
they can purchase Chrysler LLC, rationalize production with plant
closures and layoffs, and service a shrinking market with one less
competitor. This has another inverted twist: Chrysler is owned by
Cerberus Capital Management, which also owns 59% of GMAC. If this isn't
financial incest, what is?
There are
comparable bail-outs
in Canada. Despite the crisis in manufacturing - auto in particular -
and despite our own slight-of-hand artists and the global-U.S.
spillover, our "deeply integrated" Harperites are in a state of
blissful tranquility, oblivious to the suffering around them.
It is
increasingly necessary for
our social justice movements and Labour to react to this crisis and
find new methods of resistance to protect the Canadian working people.
We have the analysis, and we know the cause and effect. The question is
what to do.
The Canadian
Labour Congress
made a strong statement on the crisis before the end of the federal
election. Then on Oct. 21, a press release headed "Labour Leaders
Demand a Say in Federal Economic Plan" was published from a meeting of
the CLC Executive Council, which includes the country's largest unions
along with provincial federations, the Quebec Federation of Labour and
territorial federations, but unfortunately not the CNTU.
The release
(see page 7 for
more) contained some useful material, some rather sharp finger-pointing
and a demand for an immediate meeting with Harper before the upcoming
international summits. Other demands made it clear labour wants to be
included and consulted on measures to protect private pensions, expand
public pensions, make Employment Insurance available to laid off
workers, and cap executive compensation.
This is
good, but also in the
release were some rather strange twists. Ken Georgetti stated that
working people "need to know that the people working on solutions to
the economic crisis are on their side." Another quote: "At the heart of
the Labour plan is economic activism on the governments part through
investments in infrastructure, renewable energy and greater energy
efficiencies, rebuilding the manufacturing and forestry sectors, and
reforms to employment and labour laws." And another: "Working people
know there will be sacrifices. They should not be expected to make them
all, or any for that matter without consultation."
The labour
demands are just and
minimal. There is a problem in perception when the expression "on their
side" is thrown in as a qualifier. Are these brothers and sisters
serious? That will only happen when we have a socialist government,
because that is the measuring stick of which class is in power. We
should be prepared to force reforms whether they are on our side or
not, no peace without justice.
The second
quote on investing in
infrastructure, etc., with the exception of "reforms to employment and
labour laws," could be lifted out of any corporate demand for handouts.
It is unreasonable to demand public investment without public control
and ownership. Labour must sharpen up its agenda and put our interests
at the top. Why say "working people know there will be sacrifices" in
the future tense, when we have been hemorrhaging for years? Who gave
permission to the CLC to advise that we would make some sacrifices if
we are consulted?
Perhaps the
labour leaders of
Canada could consider something like this: "We warn the Harper minority
government that the organized working class will not be pushed another
step backward and we will not pay the cost of the neo-liberal
corporate-created crisis. We are prepared to organize resistance in
defense of our people, our sovereignty, our social programs and all our
hard won gains in unity with all democratic Canadians. We demand
employment, housing and access to the wealth of our country under
public ownership and control. We demand just settlement with Aboriginal
people. We demand withdrawal from Afghanistan and Haiti and investment
of the military expenditures on rebuilding our infrastructure and
manufacturing base."
Labour must
be prepared to sound
the alarms and champion a people's response to the crisis. There must
be a sense of emergency that will recruit the social justice movements,
the Aboriginal peoples' organizations, and every labour centre and
union in this country, affiliated to the CLC or not. In particular,
great pains must be made to form alliances with the CNTU to make a
genuine unified response and fightback possible.
We must
always remember the
legacy of capitalism is to solve crisis on the backs of the working
people. Human suffering, the horror of war and the plunder of nations
are on the first page of their recipe book. Instead of a descent into
barbarity to preserve a social system that has outlived its right to
exist, we need peace, justice and socialism.