13) SOUTH KOREAN
RAILWORKERS FIGHT PRIVATIZATION
(The
following
article is from the January 1-31, 2009, issue of People's Voice,
Canada's
leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the
source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low
income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers
- $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business
Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)
By Sean Burton,
from South Korea
The threat to the working class
around the world is most pronounced in this time of capitalist crisis.
But the capitalist system is, by its very nature, based on exploitation
for profit. Regardless of the difficult situation the world's economic
powers find themselves in, the majority of people have always been
getting screwed over. One need only look at the massive job losses in
the manufacturing industries of Canada and the U.S. over the last five
years to see that.
Exacerbating
matters is the fact
that many capitalist countries are dominated by neo-conservative and
neo-liberal economic policies. South Korea is one such country. Long a
bastion of capitalism opposed to the socialist-oriented North, South
Korea's right-wing government is eagerly embracing an increasingly
rotten economic order.
The
privatization of state-run
services is a high priority for the government led by President Lee
Myun Bak and his Grand National Party. One immediate target is the
public rail service provider, KORAIL. Ten percent of the workforce
(about 4,000 workers) would lose their jobs in the next four years
under the current plan, and some offices and train stations would be
privatized. In mid-November, unionized KORAIL employees decided to
strike in protest of the upcoming layoffs, and to demand the
reinstatement of 47 workers fired for participating in a strike in 2003.
KORAIL
issued a warning that it
would resist the strike in the name of "law and order". Naturally, the
company referred to its plans as "a more flexible and effective
operation scheme for its workers", in the words of KORAIL's
vice-president, Shim Heok Yoon. Of course such language translates into
"a smaller, cheaper, and profit-oriented operation". Furthermore, the
company's president was recently arrested on bribery charges; why
should the workers have faith in the words of these managers?
The current
global capitalist
crisis is being used as an excuse by KORAIL's executives.
Vice-president Shim essentially stated that the workers' concerns
should not matter in these difficult economic times. What matters,
apparently, is "gaining the public's trust as a public entity".
That sounds
suspiciously like an
argument for "essential services", an issue that decided the fate of
the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) strike in 2007. Ontario's main
political parties all decided that the workers are not what matters,
but rather the convenience (or, as we are led to believe, "need") of
the "public".
KORAIL
prepared an "alternative
workforce" to replace strikers. This workforce amounts to less than
half of the total number of workers. South Korean labour regulations
require a minimum workforce in the event of a strike. What are such
regulations but attacks on workers' rights? After all, they serve to
prevent strikes from being successful. Certainly, South Korean
industries stand to lose out when they cannot ship their goods via
train. That, apparently, is what matters in terms of "law and order",
as opposed to social justice.
Lee Myun Bak
has been using the
same langauge, stating on Nov. 18 that he wants "labour, management and
government to cooperate closely, as law and order is what keeps our
society running. Labour relations must rise to the level of an advanced
country."
Government
branches took steps
to crack down on what they called an "illegal strike." It is perhaps
fitting that Lee made these comments while he was in South American for
the APEC conference, yet another vehicle for imperialism. There, Lee
made it clear that economies should "roll on their own". This can only
mean that more danger awaits South Korean workers.
The KORAIL
strike has not
occurred. Seoul's subway union, which supported KORAIL's strike vote,
reached an agreement with the government, leading the larger union to
rethink its strategy. It remains to be seen how good of a deal can be
made with Lee Myun Bak.
Meanwhile,
the government is
pursuing a number of free trade deals, including with the US. The
opposition Democratic Party is strongly opposed to these deals unless
measures are taken to protect South Korean farmers and other people
expected to suffer from an increase in American imports. The Lee
government has been forcing its legislation through with little concern
for its opponents, and the bill for the trade deal was no exception.
Members of
Lee's Grand National
Party locked themselves in with the parliamentary committee for trade
hours before opposition members arrived. Opposition politicians
attempted to force their way in, fighting GNP security guards, and
using sledgehammers to beat down the doors, only to find a wall of
furniture blocking to way to the chamber. This shameless violation of
democratic procedure led opposition parties to demand that the GNP
apologize to the nation.
I will end
on a historical, and
perhaps sentimental note. The unrest among the railway workers reminds
me of an event not commonly talked about. A People's Republic of Korea
was established at the end of the Japanese occupation of Korea in 1945,
only to be banned by the US Army Military Government in Korea for its
presumed socialist orientation. This, as well as the banning of strikes
and revolutionary people's committees, led to considerable unrest. In
the city of Busan, which I have called home for the last few months,
over eight thousand railway workers broke the strike ban in September
1946. Strikes spread throughout the country, and when a number of
student demonstrators were killed, the civilian population violently
attacked the police, landlords and pro-Japanese officials. Many more
people were killed by US military units once martial law was declared.
This episode flies in the face of South Korean conservatives, who are
trying to change the "leftist" history books. Similar violence is not
likely at present, but given the widespread disgust for Lee Myun Bak,
the demonstrations could grow large and threatening indeed.