05) NORTH AMERICAN AUTO
PACT NOT THE ANSWER
(The
following
article is from the March 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice,
Canada's
leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the
source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low
income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers
- $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business
Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)
By
Liz Rowley
Disastrous news in
the auto industry has left autoworkers scared and confused as they fear
for their jobs, their living standards and their future.
Massive
layoffs and plant closures and the threat of more to come, wage and
benefit cuts, evaporating pensions, and the highest trade deficit (far
more imports than exports), threaten not only the 40,000 Ontario
workers employed directly by the auto companies, but also everyone who
has one of the 7.5 indirect and spin-off jobs dependent on the auto
assembly jobs.
Auto is the
engine of the Canadian economy, the heart of the manufacturing sector.
What happens with auto will have an enormous impact on what happens to
Ontario in particular.
To the push
for concessions, the CAW has linked its response to its demand for a
national strategy on auto by the federal and provincial governments.
Part of that strategy, says the CAW, should be government support for a
North American auto pact.
The Canada-US
auto pact that guaranteed Canadian jobs for almost 40 years was signed
in 1962. It provided the US automakers with access to the Canadian
market in exchange for guaranteed assembly jobs and plants in Canada.
Autoworkers here made cars, trucks and vans for Canadians and even more
for export. For these workers, who were guaranteed permanent, high paid
and unionized jobs, the Auto Pact did the trick. Whether the plants
were Canadian or US-owned seemed immaterial to most workers.
But in 2001,
the World Trade Organization struck down the Auto Pact as an unfair
trade barrier. Unfair, that is, to other foreign automakers who wanted
unfettered access to the Canadian and North American market, free of
encumbrances such as job and investment guarantees. US automakers, who
had enjoyed a monopoly on the Canadian market, suddenly had competition
from Asian and European carmakers with better products, and in Canada
at least, union-free workplaces. US car plants started moving south.
Since 2003, over 300,000 manufacturing jobs have been lost, many of
them in auto or related sectors.
Now the
economic recession and credit crisis are thinning out the auto
companies, and workers are being asked to bailout the hardiest with
wage cuts, job cuts, and cuts to pensions and benefits. According to
the federal government, bailing out the survivors, with conditions, is
the way to protect auto jobs and the auto industry.
The CAW has
come up with a proposal for a new North American auto pact that would
protect the North American jobs of the Big Three automakers from Asian
and European competitors. They advocate this as a way to protect
Canadian jobs.
But the
original auto pact was a stop-gap, a band-aid that worked for a time
before being wiped out by free trade and the global reach of the
transnational corporations.
Workers'
interests briefly coincided with the interests of the US carmakers, to
produce cars in Canada, but not for long, and not for much. A more
lasting solution then, and now, was for a Canadian car industry, not
private, but publicly-owned and controlled.
The bail-outs
should be rejected in favour of nationalization under public democratic
control, and the production of a Canadian car that's small, affordable,
fuel-efficient, and environmentally sustainable.
This one step
would set the stage for a transportation policy that would involve the
building of a mass public transit industry in Canada, including light
rail for urban and inter-city transit, a machine tool-industry,
ship-building, and more.
We need a
different approach today. Our approach to the auto industry should
signify what kind of overall strategy Canada really needs, and what
will benefit workers today and tomorrow.
- Liz Rowley is
the leader of Communist Party (Ontario).