05) BC HAS HIGHEST
CHILD
POVERTY IN CANADA
(The
following
article is from the March 16-31, 2009, issue of People's Voice,
Canada's
leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the
source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low
income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers
- $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business
Manager, 133 Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)
"Gordon Campbell... promised the
Deputy of Children and Family Development, and the Deputy Minister of
Human Resources if they succeeded in cutting their budgets they would
personally, Chris Haynes and Robin Siceri, receive a bonus of
$15,401..." Source: Monday Magazine, January 23, 2003
The
following commentary, "The
poor will not always be with us," is from the BC Association of Social
Workers, March 2, 2009:
Despite the
biblical injunction
that the poor will always be with us, there is nothing inevitable about
poverty. It is a social choice. For years the official response to
poverty has been that a strong economy will cure it. But we have had
years of strong economic growth and record unemployment and yet poverty
is not going away. It is increasing.
British
Columbia has the highest
average wealth in Canada. It also has the highest rate of poverty, 13%
of our population. The average poor person in BC is earning $7,700
below the minimum needed for food, clothing and shelter. Many of these
poor are not on welfare; they are working full time at minimum wage
jobs that cannot support them. 546,000 British Columbians live below
the poverty line and a quarter of them are children. While child
poverty across Canada has decreased in recent years, it has been
increasing in BC and now stands at 21.9%. Gandhi called child poverty
the worst form of violence and given that, we are doing an immense
amount of violence to our children. British Columbia has had the
highest rate of child poverty in the country for five years running and
the government has no plans for reducing this number.
This is not
because it can't be
done. Five other provinces either have plans in place, and are
achieving some success, or are considering their own plans. We need our
own plan in this province, a plan that is detailed and on which the
government can be held to account. British Columbians want such a plan.
Over 90% believe that we too can reduce poverty in our province and 87%
would like to see both the federal and provincial government set
targets and timelines to do it.
Helping the
poor is not charity;
it is a sound social investment, the cost of which is not outside our
reach. The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives estimates the price
tag of bringing all of BC's poor up to the poverty line at $2.4 billion
a year, less than our provincial government's budget surplus in every
year since 2004. But this is not necessarily a public expense. Much of
it could be covered by employers paying a living wage. While we will be
going into deficit for the next few years, the numbers show that a
provincial poverty‑reduction plan is still within the realm of
affordable possibility. This is especially so because these social
expenditures will reduce costs in others. We are already paying higher
health costs because of poverty. Over 78,000 British Columbians used
food banks on a monthly basis last year. More than a third were
children. The cognitive development of children suffers when they are
hungry and creates school failure and early dropout. Lack of legitimate
opportunity leads to increased crime and the social costs associated
with that. Through it all, the unremitting stress of poverty continues
to extract the price of fractured families. We all pay those social
costs.
Housing
shortages add to the
problem. There are over 13,000 British Columbians on the waiting list
for public housing. A Simon Fraser University study revealed that
11,750 people with severe addictions and/or mental illnesses were
"absolutely homeless" and that this group cost the government $644
million in health, social and correctional services each year. It would
have been cheaper to house them. A study by the Ontario Association of
Food Banks made a similar connection. It found that the cost of poverty
to the government was between 10 and 13 billion dollars and the cost to
Ontario as a whole was up to $38 billion. Poverty is too expensive to
keep around. We need to get rid of it.
By
supporting a comprehensive
poverty reduction program we can help people get off welfare faster,
earn enough to stay above the poverty line if they are working full
time and not encounter all the health, social and criminal justice
system costs we are paying for now because we are not paying attention
to their root cause; poverty. But the plan has to be comprehensive and
coordinated. Here are some of the basics:
1. Let the working poor support their
families by giving them a living wage. Increase the minimum wage to
$10.60 an hour, higher in the high‑cost cities, and index it. Also
increase the number of Employment Standards officers to make sure
employees are fairly treated.
2. Ensure that the poorest British
Columbians are living at the poverty line and not way below it by
increasing income assistance rates by 50%.
3. Start building at least 2,000 new
units of social housing.
4. Support parents' ability to work
by building a comprehensive system of quality, publicly‑funded child
care.
5. Increase the number of grants to
allow low‑income students to finish post secondary training. Let people
on income assistance go to school without losing benefits.
Most of all,
government should
set themselves targets and a timetable to achieve them. It is estimated
that we could reduce poverty by 75% over the next decade. If we gave
reducing poverty the same attention we are giving to raising the
Olympic banner, we could do it, and the legacy would be far more
lasting. There has been much talk of working our way out of recession
by rebuilding our public infrastructure. Why not start with our human
infrastructure?