11) NO
SANCTIONS ON
KOREA, SAYS PEACE CONGRESS
(The following article
is from the
June 16-30, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist
newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited.
Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for
U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35
CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133
Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)
Statement issued on June 5, 2009, by the Canadian Peace Congress
The Canadian Peace Congress calls on Prime Minister Harper to work for
an immediate halt to the aggressive and provocative policies of illegal
economic sanctions, regional interference and military build-up by the
United States in the Korean Peninsula. Furthermore, the Congress calls
on the Canadian government to work through the United Nations to
normalize relations between the United States and the Democratic
People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), based on non-interference,
cooperation and peace.
The belligerent and confrontational actions
that the US has taken
toward the DPRK expose the failed policies of US imperialism, which
remain at the root of instability in the Korean Peninsula. The Obama
administration has fanned the flames of global nuclear weapons
escalation, which further destabilizes all international relations,
particularly with China, and leads to a greater likelihood of future
wars - including nuclear war. Through these positions, the United
States has seriously threatened peace and the established, working and
stable armistice in the Korean Peninsula. In its statement on October
13, 2006 the Canadian Peace Congress warned of such an outcome:
"The Bush Administration's policy toward the
DPRK is regime
change. Branding North Korea as part of an `axis of evil', the Bush
Administration demands a free hand to punish a member state of the
United Nations by economic blockade and war. At the same time, the US
administration declares the DPRK has no right to self defence. Given
such options, it is not surprising that the DPRK has resorted to
nuclear weapons tests."
In addressing the current crisis,
international criticism needs to
be focused on the continuing threats and escalating provocations by
South Korea and the United States, which have propelled North Korea's
recent nuclear test and missile launches.
The actions of the United States in the
lead-up to the present
crisis have been particularly hypocritical, inflammatory and
irresponsible. In February 2009, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
stated publicly that "the Obama administration will be willing to
normalize bilateral relations, replace the peninsula's long-standing
armistice agreements with a permanent peace treaty and assist in
meeting the energy and other economic needs of the North Korean
people." But actions speak louder than words: within a month of those
comments the United States reneged on its 2008 commitment to provide
food aid to a World Food Program in the DPRK, after delivering only one
quarter of the pledged food supplies and less than 5% of the pledged
financing. Subsequently, in April 2009 the US sponsored a United
Nations Security Council resolution against the DPRK in response to the
launch of a communications satellite, even though Pyongyang had
announced the launch in February.
Furthermore, the United States has continued
to aggressively
pressure South Korea into joining the Proliferation Security Initiative
(PSI), a highly secretive creation of George W. Bush. The PSI executes
a vigilante brand of operations - which include stop and search of sea
and air vessels, port inspections and disruption of financial networks
- against targeted states under the pretext of stemming the development
and flow of weapons of mass destruction. While taking great pains to
claim otherwise, the PSI and its Statement of Interdiction Policies are
an outright violation of international law, including Article 51 of the
United Nations Charter. Blockades, forced inspections and seizures are
acts of war against a sovereign country.
The DPRK is a main target of PSI operations
but South Korea long
resisted participating, citing concerns that such provocative action
would result in a deterioration of Korean relations. This position
changed with the election of Lee Myung-bak as President of South Korea
in December 2007.
Immediately after his election Lee introduced
much more aggressive
policies toward the North. These moves have been heavily criticized by
South Korean political analysts and diplomats for being provocative and
for having destabilized North-South relations. Lee's position is
clearly based on his desire, buttressed by US policies and actions, to
provoke a change of government in the DPRK and to achieve significant
economic profit for the South in the process.
The basic threat to peace in the Asia Pacific
region is not from
the DPRK, but stems from the continued provocative interference by US
imperialism. The United States was the first state to develop nuclear
weapons; it remains the only state to have used nuclear weapons against
a population and is the only state to deploy nuclear weapons outside of
its own borders. It is the United States which deploys 250,000 military
personnel in the Pacific region, including nearly 30,000 who routinely
practice ground invasions of the DPRK, in order to protect its economic
and security interests. And, it is the United States who has refused to
follow through with its commitment to dialogue with North Korea and
instead raised the spectre of sanctions, regime change and now,
military confrontation.
All claims by the US government to the
principled right to speak
on the question of peace are erroneous. Until the United States removes
all of its foreign bases and dismantles its nuclear weapons stationed
on foreign soil, halts its nuclear weapons development programs,
reduces its nuclear arsenal, removes all of its nuclear armed
submarines from international waters, lives up to its commitments of
international non-proliferation agreements, renounces its "first strike
policy" and ceases the deployment of its missile defence shield, all
alleged US morality on the question of peace is suspect. The fact of
the matter is that until the United States reduces its stockpiles of
weapons of mass destruction and normalizes relations with other
nations, based on cooperation and non-interference, the logical outcome
will be increased weapons proliferation.
The Canadian Peace Congress remains committed
to its longstanding
policy of non-proliferation of nuclear arms. However, the issue of
non-proliferation cannot be divorced from that of abolition. For many
decades peace organizations, peace and security analysts, and diplomats
have argued that a global scheme in which a small club of nuclear
states is maintained and counterposed to the majority of "have-not"
states is unfair, naive and untenable. It is, in fact, the possession
of nuclear arms by even a single state that promotes proliferation. As
the World Peace Council noted at its 2008 Assembly:
"The so-called North Korean nuclear crisis
also has clearly
established the discriminatory nature of the NPT regime. With
development and perfection of nuclear technologies and delivery systems
by imperialism, the possibility of establishment of Nuclear Weapon Free
Zones has become completely redundant. Elimination of nuclear weapons
is an urgent task for all humanity... The WPC demands that all
countries having nuclear weapons take concrete steps for abolishing
their nuclear arsenal towards the 2010 Non-Proliferation Treaty Review
Conference."
The Canadian Peace Congress demands that the
Government of Canada:
- oppose the use of sanctions or a blockade of any kind against North
Korea, which will only escalate the present crisis;
- oppose moves by any country - and especially by the United States,
South Korea, Japan or Australia - toward a military build-up in the
region;
- take concrete steps to bring existing nuclear arsenals - in
particular that of the United States - onto the immediate agenda of the
United Nations, with a commitment to dismantle those arsenals in
preparation for the Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference in 2010;
- immediately cease its participation in the Proliferation Security
Initiative and promote the dissolution of that operation;
- promote immediate UN-sponsored assistance to the DPRK, in the spirit
of international cooperation and respect for sovereignty and the right
to self-determination.
(For more
information, visit http://www.canadianpeacecongress.ca)