03) WINNIPEG WATER
CHANGES "A
MONUMENTAL ROBBERY"
(The following article
is from the August 1-31, 2009, issue of People's Voice, Canada's
leading communist
newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited.
Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for
U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35
CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133
Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)
PV Manitoba Bureau
Ignoring demands for public hearings
and widespread opposition to privatization, Winnipeg City Council voted
10-6 on July 22 to create an "arms length" municipal water corporation
with the authority to sell water outside City limits and to privatize
some of its services.
The
Communist Party called the changes "a monumental, undemocratic robbery"
and a giant betrayal of Winnipeg, especially the core area which has
some of Canada's poorest neighbourhoods. "The polite fiction that
provincial parties should stay out of civic politics needs to be set
aside on an issue of this magnitude and urgency," said the Party.
The sale of
water outside Winnipeg will alter the region's development for decades
to come, yet its effect on housing in the core and throughout Winnipeg
was essentially ignored. Constantly denying that privatization was
proposed, Mayor Sam Katz and his supporters manipulated the debate to
avoid the housing issue.
Urged on by
people like David Angus of the Winnipeg Chamber of Commerce, Council
voted for the proposal with slight amendments. Angus argued the debate
was purely ideological and capable of being decided without reference
to any facts. But the day will come when Mr. Angus' chamber of commerce
in a hollowed-out, impoverished Winnipeg will be smaller than the one
outside the city.
The water
corporation will privatize up to 49 per cent of "new wastewater
treatment infrastructure services," which will just be the start.
Dozens of organizations spoke against privatization, defending wages,
jobs and democratic control of the utility.
The
Communist Party further pointed out that "access to water and
development are intimately combined" and that the proposal failed to
study the impact or reveal who would benefit outside the city.
"I cannot
imagine a more unpatriotic measure by a City Council," said Darrell
Rankin, Manitoba leader of the Communist Party. "No one wants a City
Council that supports giant, private land speculators outside the
perimeter at their expense. Mayor Katz stated he does not want elected
politicians to control the new water corporation. We don't need a
corporation that gives sweet deals to major corporate customers and
subsidizes the cost of new water lines to new developments outside of
Winnipeg. Residential water bills are going to skyrocket. We need
democratic control of water."
The vote
signifies that land developers outside Winnipeg have more sway than
those inside, which is essentially being abandoned. About four large
land development corporations dominate the market in the region. Major
new industrial and housing developments outside Winnipeg will devastate
the city as a whole. The plan will not help existing rural dwellers
with better water services.
"With one
vote, City Council will erase all the housing improvements in
Winnipeg's core area. (This) will show their true attitude to the
thousands of families looking for decent, affordable housing in
Winnipeg," said Rankin. The vote would break decades of promises by all
levels of government "made to Aboriginal organizations, housing
coalitions and anti‑poverty groups" to end the housing crisis.
In an
earlier statement, the Communist Party urged people to "protest the
proposal and vow to defeat any City Councillor voting in favour of the
measure" and for other provincial parties to set out their views,
calling for the Manitoba legislature to hold an emergency session "to
prevent any privatization or corporate model."
Acting in
contempt of democracy, Katz and his supporters on Council released the
new corporation's business plan on June 26, less than a month before
the vote. On July 15, nearly 30 groups and citizens expressed
opposition at a meeting of Council's executive policy committee. An
opinion poll released on July 21 said that 67 per cent of the public
wanted to delay the vote to allow more time for study and improvements
to the plan.
Nearly fifty
people rallied against the proposal at a July 15 protest organized by
the Winnipeg Labour Election Committee, which announced a second rally
to be held the day before the vote. Nearly 300 attended the July 21
rally which featured a broad range of speakers.
An essential
step in the efforts to overturn this decision will be to unite the
unions which fought the privatization of the water utility with a broad
coalition of forces that will protect housing and industrial
development in Winnipeg. This will be even more important than relying
on the provincial government to block this dangerous proposal.