14) PAKISTAN ARMY
CONTINUES OFFENSIVE AGAINST TALIBAN
(The following
article is from theSeptember 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice,
Canada's
leading communist
newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited.
Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for
U.S. readers and overseas readers - $50 per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133
Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)
By
Asad Ali
In early May, the
Pakistan Army shelled and entered several towns in the North West
Frontier Province (NWFP) held by the Pakistani Taliban, and announced
they would continue into the rural areas of the province and then to
the outlying Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), where the
insurgency started. Hamid Mir, a Pakistani television reporter for
Geo‑News, described the scenes of destruction as similar to Gaza after
Israel's invasion earlier this year. The offensive has continued
through the summer.
Statistics from the Pak Institute for Peace Studies show that the rate
of civilian casualties in Pakistan between October 2008 and March 2009
is higher than the UN's estimate for Afghanistan. The Government of
Pakistan estimates that over 1,000,000 civilians have been displaced.
News reports say that many of the people in the areas being bombed
remain there, without access to food or health care.
The Taliban's entry into Buner, an NWFP district that happens to be
between the federal capital and FATA, was blamed by the government as
the trigger of the military's offensive. However the Taliban only
entered the area after the federal government delayed in implementing a
peace agreement negotiated by the NWFP's ruling Awami (Popular)
National Party (ANP). The ANP is a secular left-wing party that
succeeds the 1930s non‑violent pro‑independence Red Shirt movement,
which Gandhi had described as the only correct implementation of his
philosophy. In the 2008 elections the ANP had won a landslide victory
in the NWFP over a religious coalition and has formed provincial
governments before.
The peace agreement was erroneously reported as a surrender and letting
the Taliban implement Shari'a Law, but in fact the deal called for the
ANP to implement Nizam‑e‑Adl (administration of religious justice)
courts that were staffed by ANP‑selected judges who applied the
plaintiffs' own concepts of religious law. This implementation became
another point of contention for the Taliban, contrary to reports of
Taliban vigilante control. Residents had said they were pleased with
the ANP's implementation as the new courts were faster than the
Provincial courts.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had called the peace agreement
an "existential threat" to the world because of Pakistan's few nuclear
weapons, yet it is the U.S. which has threatened nuclear first strikes
under George W. Bush and with NATO has killed thousands of civilians in
Afghanistan. The US commander in Afghanistan, Gen. McChrystal, recently
described US air power as "the seeds of our own destruction" and
implied civilians were killed by NATO forces not in any danger. Afghan
Taliban leaders point out that their movement is distinct from the
Pakistani Taliban with different objectives and social composition.
Progressive politicians, including ANP Senator Lala Khan from the Swat
Valley, the first NWFP district the Taliban entered, say the root
causes of the conflict are the lack of integration of the Tribal Areas
as well as inequitable distribution of resources by the federal
government, ignited by the NATO occupation of Afghanistan. Observers
point out that the Federal Government did not give the ANP's peace
agreement a chance and sabotaged it for the opportunity to launch a
military campaign against its own citizens as demanded by NATO.
Politicians from parties other than the ANP are calling for stopping
the army and resuming dialogue with the Taliban for the sake of
national unity and civilian lives.