09)
CLEAN UP THE
TORY/CORPORATE SLUDGE
(The following
article is from the October 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice,
Canada's
leading communist
newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited.
Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for
U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50
CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133
Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)
(From
a presentation by Young
Communist League General Secretary Johan Boyden on the environmental
crisis.)
We see ecological problems as deeply connected
with social
problems, and likewise the solutions. Perhaps nowhere is this clearer
than the climate crisis. Already, youth and students around the world
are mobilizing for December. That's when the world's countries, rich
and poor, meet in Copenhagen for the next climate conference.
Copenhagen will update the 1997 Kyoto protocol, establishing a binding
global agreement from 2012.
The colossal scale of global warming should
not detract from the
necessity for emboldened campaigning on other environmental fronts.
Peace is an environmental issue. Water pollution, the release of toxic
wastes, species extinction, unsustainable resource use, soil erosion,
and desertification all pose immediate dangers. Such poisons are
historically woven into the fabric of working class, Aboriginal and
racialized communities which will also be hit hardest by global warming.
Welcome to Hurricane Katrina. Welcome to the
future.
The urgency of the situation is captured in
the shift of the goals
leading into Copenhagen. The events the Kyoto process was supposed to
prevent are already beginning. Kyoto's targets placed the overall goals
at 2 degree Celsius increase. Now it is 3 degrees.
Overwhelmingly, youth and students reject the
status quo. To
August's United Nations international youth day slogan,
"Sustainability: our challenge, our future," you could add: "our bitter
inheritance." Students and trade union youth have recently formed the
Youth Climate Coalition. Planning a conference in Ottawa this October,
they call to surpass Kyoto's targets.
Our generation has seen the climate debate
shift: it can no longer
be denied or obscured as a long-term issue. The question now is: what
will be the content and direction of the response?
Many scientists insist that without radically
change in the near
term, we will reach an irreversible point. But scientific conclusions
are refracted through ideological prisms and class-based realities. In
Canada, business produces the vast majority of greenhouse gas
emissions.(Stats Can, "Canadian Environmental Sustainability
Indicators: Socio-economic Information", 2007, says 82% comes from the
"business sector".) Modest measures of environmental protection are
resisted by transnational corporations and their right-wing extremists
in Parliament and in the media. The Stern Review (2006), while
characterizing global warming as the "widest-ranging market failure
ever seen," rejected all solutions that are not "economically viable."
This brings the issue into sharp relief. Which
comes first:
nature, or profits? What social system has the capacity to arrest and
reverse this crisis?
If capitalism were compatible with solving the
climate crisis, and
companies could make more profits by charitably protecting the
environment, we would have seen green capitalism long ago. Corporations
don't need any help figuring out how to make more money. In contrast,
according to the 2006 Living Planet Report, published by the World
Wildlife Fund, socialist Cuba is the only country in the world that
enjoys "sustainable development."
But we don't have to wait until a socialist
revolution. The
strategy and tactics needed to win a better Canada and world start with
today's problems. That's why we need to break with dealing with the
environment like a charity issue. The claim that "the conscious
consumer is the best weapon against climate change" makes the main
enemy you. Drive a better car. Turn down your thermostat. Recycle.
How many reserve communities can even afford
municipal recycling?
How many people living in Toronto's Jane and Finch neighbourhood
already turn their thermostats way down? How many parents can't afford
childcare let alone eco-holidays? How many students are unable to
afford tuition, rent and dinner, let alone buy organic?
No wonder that historically oppressed and
working class
communities have seen the struggle to protect the environment as
"middle-class"! But there is a common link between exploitation of the
environment and exploitation of working people - the capitalist class
and their drive for profits. People's solutions to climate crisis must
target big business as the main enemy to a sustainable environment.
In fact, youth, workers and all people in
Canada have much to
gain. Can we unite the fight for Employment Insurance reform with a
green housing and industrial jobs strategy? Stopping plant closures
also means keeping factories under Canadian environmental regulations.
Could we connect the fight against the tar sands with the call for
democratic control of all energy and resources? Unlike market solutions
("cap and trade" or the carbon tax) public ownership allows democratic
planning for people's needs - and is a source of funding for renewable
energy and conservation programs, mass transit, free education and
childcare.
From our vantage point, meaningful
parliamentary advance - like
emergency legislation drastically cutting greenhouse gas emissions -
isn't possible without the people's mass action. Finding the tactics to
move the most people forward is complex; media stunts aren't enough.
What's needed is a united mass movement of all progressive forces,
championing social and ecological alternatives.
As we head towards Copenhagen and possibly
another election, we
must turn up the political heat on Harper's Conservatives and the big
polluting corporations. More and more Canadians realize that the only
thing green coming out of these guys is sludge. Let's clean up that
sludge, pushing for a real democratic and ecological alternative.