12) KOREA AND "THE WALL"
(The following
article is from the November 1-15, 2009, issue of People's Voice,
Canada's
leading communist
newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited.
Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for
U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50
CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 133
Herkimer St., Unit 502, Hamilton, ON, L8P 2H3.)
By
Sean Burton
When considering
the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989-90, many people think of German
"reunification." But it was not a "coming together" between the
capitalism of the Federal Republic of Germany and the socialism of the
German Democratic Republic. The FRG simply absorbed the East and
dismantled its system; to this day there exist significant differences
in living standards.
Now to Korea.
Korean reunification, if it ever happens the way Seoul sees it, is not
likely to be much different. Any visitor to the South or to the
Demilitarized Zone will hear much ado about Koreans' yearning for
reunification. That is both a sentimental statement and a statement of
propaganda. The local news gives a more accurate picture. Always, the
media reports that the government must have some plan or other for
reunification. The powerful right-wing rags often put forward such
plans or make demands of the government, and Seoul is certainly
listening.
One such
demand, elaborated in an editorial some months ago in the Chosun Ilbo,
was that Seoul should be preparing a "new North Korean elite" to run
the region after reunification. It is an obvious "plan"; if the DPRK
ever were absorbed by the South, it certainly will not be regular North
Koreans running affairs. But advocating such a plan is an affront to
anyone familiar with what happened in Eastern Europe. These countries
have come to be dominated by people trained or raised in the west, who
frequently ignore the demands of the majority of their people; consider
the mass opposition to the US missile shield in the Czech Republic or
Poland that both governments eagerly endorse. Now imagine North Korea
being run by a former Hyundai CEO like Lee Myung Bak!
Another
frequent demand is to better integrate North Korean defectors into
South Korean life. Some North Koreans did actually defect in the sense
of betraying their country, but the majority of the handfuls that
trickle in every now and then do so from sheer economic desperation,
not unlike some Cubans during the 1990s. Though Seoul "rewards" people
for moving south, there exist many difficulties in adapting to the new
lifestyle. Problems include a language barrier, since South Korea has
adopted a large number of foreign words, and the social stigma of being
from the North.
Stories
occasionally pop up about how former North Korean citizens are faring
badly in the South. According to a recent Korea Herald article, over
half of all defectors are avoiding employment. A cynic might say that
the DPRK's socialist system made them lazy workers. The hard truth is
that getting a job would mean giving up unemployment benefits. In the
survey, 38% said that doing so would deprive them of a liveable income,
and others did not want to lose their state-provided health care.
Clearly, many
of these people are just getting by, despite often having specialized
skills. The survey was conducted at the behest of Hong Jung-wook, a
member of the ruling Grand National Party, who stated that former North
Koreans should not be the dropouts of society.
One may well
wonder what Hong thinks of the many "normal" South Koreans who cannot
make ends meet. A labour project for the "underprivileged" that started
in June 2009 has employed 255,500 people in social maintenance projects
that will last only into November. These few months will not solve
anything for the poor of South Korea. Furthermore, an inspection has
revealed that over 15,000 participants in the program are not only
unqualified, but also the relatives of government officials. And that
is only in Seoul and the adjacent Gyeonggi province.
The main
opposition Democratic Party elaborated on the numbers. Some 4500
participants were said to possess "excessive wealth". About 46% were
over the age of 60, and numerous accidents and injuries have occurred
because workers were dispatched regardless of labour capacity or age,
according to opposition representative Shin Hak Yong.
Clearly Seoul
has trouble taking care of its own people now, so it takes no stretch
of the imagination to see what awaits the people of the DPRK if their
country is defeated and taken over. Yet the media does not see any
connection between the south's social problems and the system advocated
by the North. It is always discussed in a cynical, hateful way. Much
has been made lately of reports that the DPRK has revised some of its
constitution. In particular, communism has apparently been deleted as
the guiding ideology, replaced with Kim Jong Il's Songun (military
first) policy along with Juche, Kim Il Sung's self-reliance ideology. A
clause was also inserted insisting on "regard for and the protection of
human rights", the Chosun Ilbo reported. The editorial went on the
usual rant against communism, claiming that it never existed in the
DPRK or the USSR, and that it never will exist. It further claimed that
the differences between typical North Koreans and the county's military
elite far outstrip the "imbalances" of capitalism. Adding insult to
injury, the editorial called the North's constitution "useless" and
argued that it was being amended to appease international pressure.
There is
nothing new in this. Juche and Songun have been the DPRK's primary
guiding philosophies for years; direct references to Marxism-Leninism
were removed in a previous constitution. As for condemning communism,
no one has ever claimed that such a social--economic formation existed
anywhere in the last century, and saying it never will exist is typical
propaganda. And to refer to the vast inequalities and injustices of
capitalism as simple "imbalances" is despicable. Data readily available
in the South has demonstrated just how vast the gap is. South Korea
does not need to train a new elite for the North; they have always
existed in the South and they have always been leading the charge. Just
as there was no equality in German unification, there will be no
quarter given in Korea either.