09) CLIMATE CHANGE AND
YOUTH STRUGGLE
(The following
article is from the April 16-30, 2010 issue of People's Voice,
Canada's
leading communist
newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited.
Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for
U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50
CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 706 Clark
Drive, Vancouver, BC, V5L 3J1.)
The 25th Central Convention of the Young Communist League-Ligue de la
jeunesse comuniste (YCL-LJC) will be held May 21-23 in Toronto. We
reprint here some excerpts from Part 5 of the Call to the 25th
Convention, the section on struggles by young people around the issue
of climate change.
The issue of climate change has engaged many
young people today -
first, because the nature of the impacts which will primarily involve
the young generation, secondly because most of us were born at a moment
when climate debate became very public.
The Copenhagen conference teaches us many
things. First, it
illustrates how global warming is mobilizing the masses and especially
the youth in all countries. The Asia-Pacific started the flow of events
around the world with some 50,000 people in the streets in Australia,
Canberra, Sydney and Melbourne. In Manila, Hong Kong, Jakarta, and as
in most major Canadian cities, rallies of several hundred protesters
were also held. In Copenhagen itself, hundreds of thousands of people
began marching in the cold to protest.
One thing is interesting to note in this
mobilization: some have
noticed, like the French deputy José Bové, a farmer and
altermondialisme personality, that here is an opportunity to link
"climate justice and social justice... Today, there is no break between
the fight against global warming and the fight for another world."
With the abysmal failure of this United
Nations conference which
was suppose to conduct an agreement between states to reduce GHG
following the Kyoto agreement, it becomes obvious to the people that
the imperialist countries have no desire to act. The strings of this
conference were pulled by the United States and its allies including
Canada. The so-called agreement that came out was not obtained in a
democratic way and is a farce. In summary, the countries simply have
the obligation by the end of the year to provide targets for 2020.
At this summit, leaders of imperialist
countries have been singled
out and accused of being in the pay of industry. For the general
public, the belief is that industry and individual consumption are
causing climate change. But as Marxists, we know that this is not so
much the industry as the way it is implemented; in other words, how
capitalism works. For itself, industry is not necessarily something
negative. In fact, because of industry for the first time in history,
the development of productive forces has the potential to produce
enough to meet the needs of all.
About individual consumption, this is a way
for capitalists to
individualize the problem and put us all in the same boat. Under this
idea, people are all equally responsible for the disaster. But the
working men and women of the world do not consume as the bourgeois
class does. Half the planet lives on less than $2 per day and is not
liable as the capitalists who exploit them.
It is not without reason that the media
propagate massively the
idea of the individual solution. Only the rich can afford an electric
car, organic vegetables or any other new product supposedly green. The
conditions of the working class already determine its consumption. This
idea of individual responsibility is dangerous and leads to even
viewing with a negative eye the aspiration of some developing countries
to achieve a standard of living equivalent to the occident.
Instead, we need to consider the demands of
Evo Morales, President
of the Republic of Bolivia and others who call for climate reparations,
and funding sustainable technologies in the developing world. The
obstacle to this is imperialism, which prefers to make trillions off
these countries rather than address the gravity of climate change.
Climate change is not caused by all classes.
Furthermore, it will
not consistently impact humanity. Those who are most affected by
environmental crisis will be the poorest in the world. Climate change
will bring the disruption of ecosystems, and therefore lifestyles that
are more dependent on the immediate environment. It will affect the
health of populations, such as the development of certain infectious
and respiratory diseases. Which brings us back to fight for a public
health system accessible to all.
In 2007, the Secretary General of the United
Nations said that in
many developing countries, youth, and in particularly girls and young
women, are often responsible for agricultural work, collecting water
and firewood, tasks which "will become more difficult and take longer
at the expense of education and productive activities as climate change
affects access to water, agricultural productivity and the survival of
ecosystems."
Imperialism is considering other approaches to
solving global
warming as well - so-called "Plan B." This is because the effects of
global warming have already begun and are expected to get much worse.
Therefore immediate problems of mitigation come into play. Plan B or
geo-engineering is the intentional large-scale manipulation of the
global environment, generally to reduce undesired climatic change
(i.e., initiating a giant plankton bloom in the ocean, or the injection
of large amounts of sulfate aerosols into the atmosphere simulating a
volcanic eruption). NASA, the British Institute of Mechanical
Engineers, the British Royal Society, and the UK parliament are all
doing studies on geo-engineering. But these nightmarish solutions could
cause unknown damage.