05) THE COMMERCIAL MASS MEDIA AND THE G20
WARRIOR NATIONS
(The following
article is from the August 1-31, 2010 issue of People's Voice,
Canada's
leading communist
newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited.
Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for
U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50
CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 706 Clark
Drive, Vancouver, BC, V5L 3J1.)
By Roy L.
Piepenburg
The Canadian Peace Alliance, renowned
for its reliability in reporting peace movement news, released some
stunning figures concerning the spending of G20 nations in preparation
for war, and/or actual participation in war: "The G20 nations account
for 87% of global military spending, with $1.29 trillion spent in 2009,
95% of arms production, possession of 98.5% of nuclear weapons and
96.5% of troops in Afghanistan."
Keep those
statistics in mind as
you recall some of the recent excellent articles in People's Voice
about the gross disparities in the `have not nations' when it comes to
the poor quality of health and education services, meagre per capita
income, intolerable longevity and decimation of the environment, just
to mention several facets of their privation. These dire circumstances
can all be attributed to the continued colonization and exploitation of
those nations by the imperialist G20 nations, whose only real interest
is their selfish national economic interest.
Historically, the U.S.A. has
been foremost in its imperialistic bent. Their involvement in
Afghanistan is a case in point. The future construction of a
trans-Afghanistan pipeline to tap the rich oil resources in the Caspian
Sea region clearly serves American interests. A recent media story
about the vast strategic mineral resources in the same nation was based
on the assessing of that wealth by none other than the U. S. Geological
Survey. The corrupt Afghan puppet government complicates the U. S.
strategy to reap economic benefits through bloody militarism.
But, the U.
S. strategy has
ancient historical roots going back to the period of American
imperialistic expansion in the late 19th century. Woodrow Wilson, U.S.
president, 1912-1920, said in 1907: "Since trade ignores national
boundaries and the manufacturers insist on having the world as a
market, the flag of the nation must follow him (e.g. Latin America),
and the doors of the nations which are closed against him must be
battered down.... Concessions obtained by financiers must be
safeguarded by ministers of state, even if the sovereignty of unwilling
nations be outraged in the process. Colonies must be obtained or
planted, in order that no useful corner of the world may be overlooked
or left unused (e.g. Afghanistan)."
At the G20
summits, there are
always hollow commitments made to better the quality of life in the
`have not nations,' and billions of dollars are earmarked for that
purpose. The unfortunate reality is that those commitments are not
honoured. Why not? The obvious answer is that, collectively, they spend
so much on their military, that only crumbs are left over for poor
colonized nations' needs.
The
challenge exists for all
human beings on the left to reverse this unfair, inhuman circumstance.
When we have a socialist global village, the inequities will disappear.
The warrior nations will be subdued and drastically reoriented for
Earth peace and universal social justice.