08) NORTHERN B.C.
BIOSOLID DUMPING FACES RESISTANCE
(The following
article is from the August 1-31, 2010 issue of People's Voice,
Canada's
leading communist
newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited.
Subscription rates in Canada: $30/year, or $15 low income rate; for
U.S. readers - $45 US per year; other overseas readers - $45 US or $50
CDN per year. Send to:
People's Voice, c/o PV Business Manager, 706 Clark
Drive, Vancouver, BC, V5L 3J1.)
By Stephen Von
Sychowski
Biosolids
are processed human
waste derived from sewage. In some parts of the world, they are widely
used as fertilizer for crops. In other countries they are banned. All
around the world, where biosolids are used there are reports of health
problems, sometimes severe, attributed to them. So it isn't surprising
that when residents of the Red Rock/Stoner community in northern B.C.
were outraged to learn that without any consultation, biosolids would
soon find a home at a dump site in their area.
In late
2009, signage appeared
on a lot on East Patterson Road in Red Rock, stating that it would soon
become a biosolids dump. The biosolids, from the nearby city of Prince
George, are purported by the project's supporters to be safe, but no
conclusive proof has been provided, and $40,000 for basic tests to
prove the safety of the biosolids was put on hold last May. At a
community meeting in February 2010, Prince George Mayor Dan Rogers
attempted to quell fears about the potential dangers of the dumping,
but local residents were unconvinced.
Meanwhile,
dozens of cases have
been reported around Canada of symptoms ranging from rashes and sore
throats to difficulty breathing and severe digestive problems in areas
where biosolids are present.
Red
Rock/Stoner residents have
additional cause for concern in that all drinking water in the area
comes from underground wells which could easily be contaminated by
seeping biosolids. Livestock, wildlife, and pets could also be put at
risk if they come in contact with the substances.
Bob
Headrick, Regional Director
for Red Rock and one of the leading figures in opposition to the
biosolid site, had the following to say in a media statement: "This
site is less than one kilometer from residents and is near the Red Rock
Creek. After researching the use of Class B bio solids there are
concerns in the community that contamination in the form of heavy
metals, pathogens and other contaminants may affect surface and
underground water ways, may dry and become airborne and may affect game
such as moose, deer grouse, etc."
Another
community leader, Sheila
Coburn, backed Headrick up. "You don't have to be the guy who lives
next door to be concerned," she said. "They're not working it in, it's
a surface application. It's going on a open field on top of a hill.
Where is it going to end up? In our backyards and our wells."
While
residents await testing
which will supposedly prove or disprove concerns about the project,
dumping remains on hold. If the dump site is stopped, it could send a
message to local and provincial governments about the need for
environmentally practices and for a respectful consultative process
with those potentially affected. In the meantime, many community
members maintain their opposition and willingness to fight the
establishment of the dump site which could threaten their health and
livelihood.